Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -955. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 129,643–130,884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 16:35
129,786
-147
11 Aug 2026, 17:46
129,933
-135
10 Aug 2026, 15:44
130,068
-138
9 Aug 2026, 17:41
130,206
-177
8 Aug 2026, 14:53
130,383
-96
7 Aug 2026, 14:58
130,479
-170
6 Aug 2026, 12:11
130,649
-92
6 Aug 2026, 01:31
130,741
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:01
130,741
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
110
Videos
9
Links
138
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
35m 25s
Average length
8m 51s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
689 reactions across 20 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
247
35.8%
❤
125
18.1%
🔥
86
12.5%
😁
47
6.82%
🤡
44
6.39%
🤣
28
4.06%
❤🔥
17
2.47%
💩
15
2.18%
👏
12
1.74%
🥰
12
1.74%
⚡
10
1.45%
👎
8
1.16%
🤬
8
1.16%
🤯
6
0.871%
🎉
5
0.726%
🤮
5
0.726%
🖕
4
0.581%
💯
3
0.435%
🍓
2
0.29%
🦄
2
0.29%
3 further kinds
3
0.435%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 689reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2024 to 3 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
54
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WutmuTon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2024 to 3 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔤Выход из матрицы: строим интернет, о котором мечтал Дуров🔤
👁 Web2 обещал свободу, но стал золотой клеткой. Каждый шаг отслеживается, каждое слово фильтруется, а каждый аккаунт — аренда. Павел пытался вырваться — система ударила в ответ. Теперь наша очередь.
📓 webdom — ключ к независимости. Первый маркетплейс доменов🌐, где ты сам выбираешь и управляешь своей цифровой идентичностью — будь то бренд, кошелек или проек…
Ребята старались год, прошли через кучу трудностей, потерянных денег, но наконец-то выпустили маркетплейс и фильм. Будет что посмотреть сегодня вечером
Пол часа назад смартконтракт tokentable для клейма $PX дал дубу. Все кто прошли через глючный интерфейс в последние 30 минут до сих пор не могут получить свои токены.
Тон блокчейн при этом работает стабильно
Один из моих дорогих братьев создал новый аналог мемхеша, только с блекджеком и шлюхами собственным мини блокчейном и геймификацией.
Обычно подобные приложения для запуска требуют так дорогие нашему кошельку звёзды, этот бот не исключение, но для братьев своего брата владелец сделал промокод wutmu, который по-братски позволит запустить майнинг абсолютно бесплатно первым 30 братьям, ладно уже 29.
Майнинг в Telomine…
Небольшой опрос, за последнее время TON подрос, есть куча направлений занятости, КТО ЧЕМ ЗАНЯТ?
Тыкаю тапалки28%
Участвую в тестнетах12%
Торгую нфт12%
Торгую токены22%
Активный участник дефи(фарминг, стейкинг, лендинги)19%
Инвестирую в проекты20%
Сплю, отдыхаю37%
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Запуск webdom.market
Команда $WEB3 вернулась с новыми анонсами, их маркетплейс выходит из стадии альфа-тестирования и переходит в стадию бета-теста. Всю обратную связь (баги, отзывы, ошибки) можно писать в их специальный чат — @webdom_tech_support.
Маркетплейс создавался для торговли доменами, но команда решила этим не ограничится и уже добавила первую стороннюю коллекцию: ваучеры X Empire.
Пока функционал маркетп…
Жду листинг $STORM 15 октября (только что на аме проболтались), но сильнее меня интересует TGE $EVVA, они планировали запускаться после шторма, думаю, если всё будет хорошо то во второй половине октября будет запуск
Если вы проснулись рано утром в своей Москве и решили провести транзакциию – не торопитесь. Одна из шард тона опять погибла, подробностей нет, все разработчики спят сладким сном)
Наконец-то
Если что просто взломали бота поддержки и всем рассылают скам сообщения, думаю со средствами всё хорошо
@WutmuTON
👍13🔥5😁5❤3💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WutmuTon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Небольшой опрос, за последнее время TON подрос, есть куча направлений занятости, КТО ЧЕМ ЗАНЯТ?
Тыкаю тапалки28%
Участвую в тестнетах12%
Торгую нфт12%
Торгую токены22%
Активный участник дефи(фарминг, стейкинг, лендинги)19%
Инвестирую в проекты20%
Сплю, отдыхаю37%
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2024 to 3 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 124,465 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@WutmuTon named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tondnsnews_ru named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Где деньги Криптовски @kriptovsky_drop · 150,762 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wutmu о TON” (@WutmuTon), 129,786 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WutmuTon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
