Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟

@Grafenity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,232subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001178308966
TypeChannel
Username@Grafenity
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Grafenity

Growth

6,2316,2386,234.56 August 2026 — 6,235 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,235 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,231 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,238 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,232 subscribers6,2326 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,230–6,239 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:476,232-6
10 Aug 2026, 03:216,238+7
7 Aug 2026, 06:486,231-4
6 Aug 2026, 21:006,235no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:496,235first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 25 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 06s
Average length
1m 47s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,130 reactions across 17 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍27512.9%
custom 52309397332191200681818.50%
custom 59360778860992979931567.32%
custom 54430146655609524661366.38%
🔥1275.96%
custom 53551492124618502211115.21%
🤯1014.74%
custom 5233553276653298978884.13%
custom 5456261272414741619683.19%
663.10%
custom 5262660390277376757643.00%
custom 5357571638441298117562.63%
🤬542.54%
custom 5386392453840407594522.44%
custom 5208556262047910225482.25%
442.07%
custom 5951762148886582569421.97%
custom 5363920802695617184341.60%
😡321.50%
custom 5440883464133971362301.41%
29 further kinds36517.1%

Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2026 to 7 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
101,347
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 17 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
100,000
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Grafenity. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 January 2026 to 7 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Mar 2026, 17:40 UTC≈8,640 views417 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 5230939733219120068181custom 593607788609929799397custom 523355327665329897888custom 546324982845042456826custom 545405675589600029425

24 Feb 2026, 07:49 UTC≈10,200 views148 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Считаете Telegram пособников террористов?

  1. Да, мессенджер поддерживает терроризм14%
  2. Ровно такой же как все другие мессенджеры35%
  3. Точно нет35%
  4. Не знаю что ответить, нет мнения4%
  5. Хочу посмотреть ответы13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 535514921246185022170custom 535757163844129811737custom 546295680860160685924custom 59565534297184051769custom 54448934431699836918

Signed 𝕊𝕖𝕘𝕒 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟 ✶

24 Feb 2026, 07:49 UTC≈9,240 views89 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

😂Павел Дуров скоро экстремист, также как Telegram. Привет. В российских СМИ началась информационная кампания против Telegram, заголовки впечатляют. Как вам такой: "Кровавая статистика: мессенджер как орудие убийства". После первых шагов по замедлению Telegram возникла реакция в обществе, она крайне негативна и выливается в очень резкие высказывания против тех, кто затеял это всё. Нынешняя кампания должна придать лег

😡32custom 537956893621800929020custom 535757163844129811719custom 535514921246185022112custom 59565534297184051766

Signed 𝕊𝕖𝕘𝕒 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟 ✶

10 Feb 2026, 14:39 UTC≈7,230 views117 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026

⚡️Инсайдеры в телеком‑отрасли говорят, что Роскомнадзор второй день проводит масштабные тесты нового инструмента замедления Telegram. Теперь речь не про привычные «притормаживания» — пользователи по всей стране уже жалуются, что фото, видео и даже стикеры грузятся как в эпоху 3G. В некоторых регионах мессенджер будто «умирает» на глазах. По данным источников, испытания идут в «боевом режиме»: провайдерам спускают н

🤬54custom 53551492124618502212917💔10custom 53639251449075549917

Signed 𝕊𝕖𝕘𝕒 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟 ✶

10 Feb 2026, 06:16 UTC≈4,630 views62 reactions36 Starsread 12 August 2026

Экономика крафта Начнём с расчёта RTP крафта в текущих условиях. Текущий флор календарей, пригодных для крафта, — 11 TON. Исходя из вероятности 22% на успешный крафт, один новый скрафченный календарь обойдётся вам в: 11 / 0.22 = 50 TON Для того чтобы посчитать среднюю стоимость результата, я составил таблицу с текущими ценами подарков, которая учитывает: выпадение монохромов с вероятностью 10%, выпадение блека с

custom 53639208026956171843412🤷‍♂9custom 54407689474209589994custom 53886221947020384223

Signed 𝕊𝕖𝕘𝕒 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟 ✶

9 Feb 2026, 16:06 UTC≈6,620 views106 reactions16 Starsread 12 August 2026

Вероятное распределение скрафченной коллекции Desk Calendar Всего существовало 265 000 календарей, которые ни разу не появлялись в блокчейне. С учётом вероятностей успешного крафта в среднем ожидается около 58 000 новых моделей. При этом можно предположить, что как минимум 30% календарей не будут скрафчены либо уже утеряны. Следовательно: 58 000 × 0,7 ≈ 40 000 новых календарей. Распределение по редкостям Судя по

44custom 520617122375876957027🤯22👍7🔥6

Signed 𝕊𝕖𝕘𝕒 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟 ✶

9 Feb 2026, 12:09 UTC≈4,950 views114 reactions54 Starsread 12 August 2026

🎁Крафт. Ожидание и реальность. Легальное казино и будущее гифтов. Привет. Спустя сутки после долгожданного запуска крафта накопилось достаточно данных для того, чтобы примерно понимать будущее подарков. Если кратко - всё будет расти. Нас ждёт как плавный рост стоимости всех коллекций так и постоянные локальные пампы. Весь процесс растянется на годы. Главный вопрос в комьюнити стоял про возможность крафта ончейн по

custom 520855626204791022548👍33custom 593607788609929799320🔥8custom 54540567558960002945

Signed 𝕊𝕖𝕘𝕒 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟 ✶

8 Feb 2026, 23:32 UTC≈6,380 views217 reactions300 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁Голова в пасти Хозяев, а ETH фундамент дырявый. Почему некогда Легенда, а сегодня крипто-кукла наезжает на Телеграм.🏅 Привет. Не позволю этому смешному мальчику нападать на Телеграм. А точнее не ему, а его кукловодам - ведь сам он давно уже Voodoo Doll и по совместительству самый известный Crypto Clown. Но, сначала стоит отдать должное Виталику. Будучи юнцом он ПЕРВЫМ реализовал смарт-контракты в блокчейне и назва

👍101🔥59custom 593607788609929799339👎11custom 54249126840783485337

Signed 𝕊𝕖𝕘𝕒 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟 ✶

8 Feb 2026, 14:10 UTC≈3,320 views64 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Black из разноцветных. https://t.me/nft/DeskCalendar-58008 И 100% шанс из самых рарных. 🎁✅@Grafenity

👍39👏13custom 52065130859756639595🔥4custom 54562612724147416193

Signed 𝕊𝕖𝕘𝕒 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟 ✶

7 Feb 2026, 17:32 UTC≈2,740 views162 reactions20 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 544301466556095246678custom 545626127241474161945custom 526266039027737675739

Signed 𝕊𝕖𝕘𝕒 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟 ✶

7 Feb 2026, 17:32 UTC≈2,810 views103 reactions718 Starsread 12 August 2026

Теперь мой. Напарник Серафима.

custom 544301466556095246658custom 526266039027737675725custom 545626127241474161920

Signed 𝕊𝕖𝕘𝕒 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟 ✶

4 Feb 2026, 00:38 UTC≈3,950 views119 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎁Все Rare Bird на чёрном. Общее количество: 14971 шт. Моделей: 51 / Сверкают: 50 На чёрном: ~222 Фонов: 80 Узоров: 200 Мнения по поводу новой коллекции разделились. Кому-то орлы совершенно не нравятся, а кому-то кажутся чуть ли не самыми красивыми подарками. Мне нравятся, особенно на чёрном фоне. Я посмотрел все анимации птичек на black, а заодно записал мувик. Хочу теперь Icarus в коллекцию, а вы? 🦅✅@Grafenity

custom 538639245384040759452custom 544088346413397136230👍19custom 545421449715990660411custom 54494955994119264527

Signed 𝕊𝕖𝕘𝕒 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟 ✶

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Grafenity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Feb 2026, 07:49 UTCAnonymous Poll1,510 voters approx.

Считаете Telegram пособников террористов?

  1. Да, мессенджер поддерживает терроризм14%
  2. Ровно такой же как все другие мессенджеры35%
  3. Точно нет35%
  4. Не знаю что ответить, нет мнения4%
  5. Хочу посмотреть ответы13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2026 to 7 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 165,078 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕗𝕖𝕟” (@Grafenity), 6,232 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Grafenity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.