Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TONOTEKA

@tonoteka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,102subscribers

-71 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001245954377
TypeChannel
Username@tonoteka
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tonoteka

Growth

9,1029,1739,137.56 August 2026 — 9,173 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,173 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,171 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,129 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,102 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,091–9,184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:339,102-27
9 Aug 2026, 14:119,129-42
6 Aug 2026, 06:049,171-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:519,173no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:049,173first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4025.5%
3321.0%
🔥3321.0%
😁2314.6%
🎉117.01%
🤝53.18%
👎42.55%
💯42.55%
🕊21.27%
10.637%
🤡10.637%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2024 to 24 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tonoteka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 November 2024 to 24 January 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jan 2025, 07:59 UTC≈2,460 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Три вещи, которые я бы пожелал себе 3 года назад: 1. Не быть слишком оптимистичным 2. Не холдить токены проектов 3. Купить номера на всю котлету

🔥20😁9👍73

24 Jan 2025, 07:34 UTC≈2,370 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Исполнилось 3 года, как я пришёл в TON

🎉11🤝5😁51👎1

20 Jan 2025, 06:00 UTC≈2,260 views24 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026

Ноль FOMO 😌 Не разделяю расстроенные чувства тех, кто не успел вовремя взять токен от вновь избранного американского президента. Сам его не покупал и не планирую. Отсуствие FOMO из-за этого по единственной причине: я уделял ноль внимания экосистеме SOLANA, да и всем остальным. Три года я полностью сосредоточен на TON, поэтому из-за взлётов и падений в других сетях не переживаю. Пропустить что-то подобное в TON — в

👍115💯4👎3😁1

28 Dec 2024, 08:57 UTC≈1,740 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Улучшение маршрутизации 💱 DEX-биржа TONCO, работающая по модели концентрированной ликвидности (CLAMM), интегрирована в DEX-агрегаторы swap.coffee и rainbow.swap. Хорошая новость, ведь чем больше количество возможных маршрутов, тем выгоднее может быть курс. Особенно если обменивается крупная сумма. Например, при обмене TON на USDT иногда можно увидеть, что операция идёт сразу по 4 маршрутам: 🟢DeDust 🟢StonFi v2 🟢St

1

27 Dec 2024, 07:47 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Снежинки на swap.coffee ❄️ В честь новогодних праздников на swap.coffee идёт интересная активность. При обменах за каждые $100 объёма на экране появляется 1 снежинка. Её нужно успеть поймать — счётчик снежинок появился рядом с адресом кошелька. Если обмен > $300, то будет 3 снежинки сразу (на скрине третья снежинка не попала в кадр) и т.д. По итогам ивента 10 пользователей, набравших больше всех снежинок, получат п

26 Dec 2024, 09:43 UTC≈1,010 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ваши итоги года в сети TON 🗓 Вчера Ton Community представило бота, который формирует персональный отчёт за 2024 год через анализ кошелька. В стиле, как это делает Кинопоиск или Яндекс.Музыка. Смотреть такие итоги всегда интересно, а тем более в той сфере, которой ты реально уделил много времени. Я получил два статуса: ✅ TON-активист и ✅ Дроп хантер. Всё по делу: активностей было много и вкусных дропов тоже. В неко

🔥2

23 Dec 2024, 19:01 UTC≈1,010 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

7 сезон Открытой лиги. Итоги ❄️ На сайте society.ton.org обновилась таблица участников с итоговыми значениями дропа. Я занял 35 место с 28690 очками, за что полагается $1000 призовых. Несколько инсайтов 💡 для вас: 🟢Можно подумать, что я влил много ликвидности в протоколы TON, чтобы подняться так высоко, но нет. В ликвидность я вообще ничего не вкладывал. Все очки набраны только лишь благодаря торговым объёмам на D

7

9 Dec 2024, 04:42 UTC≈1,180 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Когда через полгода вдруг задумался о дропе за свои SBT 😁 Но кажется эту машину уже не остановить... @tonoteka

😁8

8 Dec 2024, 05:39 UTC≈1,140 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Cобрал 500 SBT ✔️ Ранее я уже писал про SBT-хантинг и зачем пользователи охотятся за этим видом NFT. С тех пор общий смысл не поменялся, но появились дополнительные детали. На сайте TON Society есть отдельный лидерборд Badges для обладателей SBT. Сейчас пользователи набирают очки для дропа в Открытой Лиге, а параллельно можно собирать SBT. За них также обещали 🪙 дроп весной 2025 года. Но теперь ещё один дополните

🔥42🕊2

6 Dec 2024, 05:12 UTC967 views23 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Не парюсь из-за потерь 😎 Один из главных навыков, которым учит крипта, это спокойно относиться к потере своих средств. Когда начинаешь вкладывать во что-то деньги, то на своём опыте узнаёшь, такие слова как скам, дамп, рагпул, ханипот и прочее. Каким бы умным и осторожным ты не был, это тебя не убережёт. И первый опыт получается весьма 🔴болезненным. Ты жалеешь и переживаешь, что буквально только что эти средства у

👍106🔥51🤡1

5 Dec 2024, 10:15 UTC922 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

swap.coffee — множитель дропов 💎 К концу года активности в экосистеме TON достигли своего пика. Тут и Мемландия, и Открытая Лига и много чего ещё. Возможно не все смекнули, что многое из этого пересекается между собой. И делая одно действие можно фармить множество наград. Расскажу как обмануть ракетку 🚀 на примере swap.coffee. В качестве действия — обмен жетонов на DEX-агрегаторе. 1️⃣ За каждые $20 торгового объём

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tonoteka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 856,234 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TONOTEKA” (@tonoteka), 9,102 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonoteka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.