Channel
@web3tondns
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
158,100subscribers
-781 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001605182489 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @web3tondns |
| Description | We talk about Web 3.0 in plain language: domains, the market, the community — and how to profit from it. 📱 WEB3 Portal: @tondnsclub 📈 WEB3 ecosystem news: @web3ton 🦾 Community: @dns_ton Start here 📍 https://t.me/web3tondns/690 🇷🇺 @tondnsweb3 @domainer |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/web3tondns |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 158,100 | -161 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 158,261 | -135 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 158,396 | -129 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 158,525 | -119 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 158,644 | -94 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 158,738 | -132 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:40 | 158,870 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 158,881 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:50 | 158,881 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 26 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
57 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 49.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 36.8% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 8.77% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @web3tondns. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 November 2025 to 12 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
> ENS, one of the largest and most widely integrated naming protocols in the decentralized web, has added native support for TON ADNL contenthash in its official app. > eth.limo, the leading gateways for decentralized ENS websites, has also implemented ADNL resolution, enabling ENS names to point directly to TON Sites. > This is not a minor integration or another token listing on centralized exchange, or promoting…
👍4
10K Club is now on X. TON is no longer a local story. Telegram has become a global platform, and .ton domains are slowly turning into digital identities for the new internet. We’re stepping beyond Telegram to share TON DNS, Web3, and the community that is building this future right now. Follow us. This is just the beginning. @club10k
❤🔥11
Webdom spotted at Hong Kong Web3 Festival 😁
❤🔥3👍3
Your support is more important than ever! Please vote and comment for adding TON DNS and TON Sites to Telegram profiles. 🔣 https://t.me/bugs?startapp=c-60981
👍4
Digital Resistance 👋 Join the Resistance Dog Plush community @plushieredo 🐶 @PlushiesRedoBot
Value begins where limitation appears. 🏠These were never just numbers. And never just domains. This is a tool that is only now beginning to reveal itself as part of a larger system. Around 4-digit TON DNS, an ecosystem is gradually forming. Services are emerging that help interpret it — but it’s important not to confuse cause and effect. They don’t create interest — they appear where it already exists. Where people…
❤🔥1👍1👎1
📆 MWEB3GA 🥳
👍2👎2❤🔥1
TON DNS Summer (Part 1) As we predicted, the hype around TON DNS has begun. The hype began with Four-Digit domains (hereinafter referred to as 4N domains). People are "burning" their 100 TON on the TON DNS smart contract and transferring this value to NFTs (similar to Banksy's work). On February 13, the last domain from the Club 100 (0074.ton), was minted, on February 17, the thousandth domain (5755.ton), and on Fe…
👍1👎1
TON DNS Summer (Part 2) Part 1 is here. Why is this post on the channel about numbers included in the monthly column? 1. Both Collectible Numbers and numeric domains consist solely of digits. These domains have the potential to become luxury assets, as Collectible Numbers already are. 2. Both 4N domains and Collectible Numbers have their own masks and subcollections, which facilitates easy pricing and marketmakin…
👍1👎1
Why domains are a must-have for meme-coin holders 🥳 Meme coins blow up the market, but most of them exist only in Telegram chats and on DEXs — no site, no identity, no long-term presence. If you want your meme coin to live longer than one pump, it needs a domain. In Web 3.0, it’s not the loudest coins that survive — it’s the most recognizable ones. If you’re holding a meme coin, make sure its name lives in the bloc…
👍10❤🔥3👀2
How to analyze meme coins — what to look at, what to measure, and how to choose promising tokens The crypto world keeps surprising us — and meme coins are a phenomenon of their own. Once considered a joke, today they deliver x10–x100, shape trends, and attract massive communities. But success comes not to those who “just buy the meme,” but to those who know how to analyze. Below are the core criteria for analysis +…
❤🔥2👍2👀1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @web3tondns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 211,546 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
12 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WEB3 TON DNS Media” (@web3tondns), 158,100 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web3tondns.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.