7 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,209–1,211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 01:44
1,210
+1
12 Aug 2026, 22:37
1,209
no change
12 Aug 2026, 14:46
1,209
-1
12 Aug 2026, 09:15
1,210
no change
12 Aug 2026, 09:04
1,210
-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:47
1,211
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:32
1,211
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.1%
avg views ÷ 1,210 subscribers
Avg views / post
280
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
20 (15 December 2025 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
560
Reactions total
19
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
201 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
68
33.8%
❤
51
25.4%
👍
41
20.4%
🙏
12
5.97%
💯
11
5.47%
🏆
8
3.98%
👏
6
2.99%
🤡
2
0.995%
🤝
1
0.498%
🫡
1
0.498%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
90
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 20 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
22
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @katesmithrent. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 December 2025 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Growth of Number Holders
The attached image shows the growth of the total amount of number holders (blue graph) and holders of one number (red graph).
After the initial mint, the number collection contained approximately 30,343 unique holders and 18,650 holders of one number; these figures now stand at 48,211 (+58.89%) and 33,767 (+81.06%), respectively. The number of unique holders is growing by 13.66 wallets per …
@katerent is on hospital now 💔. I’ll contact you when I recover. I won’t delete any active rentals until the rental ending. My assistant will help you from my account. Please ask for new payment addresses. Sorry for temporary inconveniences 🙏
#attention
Still don't believe the $30k for 4N TON DNS?
The attached screenshot shows the sales history of 4-digit .com domains for the period March-May 2026.
We quote one of the largest 4N holders @moroz: "Over the past two months, more than 25 4-digit .com domains have changed hands, with the lowest sale price being $5,900 and the highest being $128,888. 95% of these [domains] will never be used for websites; they are simpl…
Numbers with the Only Owner History
The number of previous owners is also important when considering the sale of a number (just as newly mined Bitcoin is considered the purest). The more owners a number has had, the more it can negatively impact a potential buyer's purchase decision.
The number of owners for a specific number can be viewed on Getgems. And here the number of numbers is shown by Owner. Numbers with o…
Kate Smith's Rent is 3 years old! 🎉
Unfortunately, almost none of what we had planned for 2025 came to fruition. We are no less upset than you are. We apologize for this and ask you not to hold a grudge 🥺. As they say, "What's promised takes three years to come." We promise to make things right by our 4th anniversary.
3 years is a fairly long time in crypto. There's the Lindy effect: if something exists for example…
Kate Smith's account is now linked to the number +888 0520 0520 which is one of the most valuable and rare Collectible Numbers, which perfectly complements my domain 0520.ton. Both assets complement and reinforce each other, adding strength and arguments in potential negotiations for the sale of either asset.
We're setting the momentum. Others will surely follow.
Find and mint 4N domains that complement existing as…
4N domains are your protection from scams
Here is an example of a scam where the first four and last four digits of a wallet are imitated. The victim lost a total of 135,000 TON. Fortunately, this story has a happy ending. The scammer returned most of the amount to the owner, keeping 10,000 TON as a reward.
To avoid such scams, use short wallet name for both you and those you send funds to.
3,850 (38.5%) 4N domain…
Price Adjustment!
Many customers have asked us for price reductions. We're now meeting their needs and lowering prices for Random and Rare numbers. All current rentals will be renewed at the adjusted prices.
——
价格调整!
许多客户要求我们降低价格。现在,我们满足了他们的需求,降低了随机号码和稀有号码的价格。所有现有租赁订单将按调整后的价格续订。
——
가격 조정 안내!
많은 고객분들께서 가격 인하를 요청하셨습니다. 이에 따라 랜덤 및 레어 넘버의 가격을 인하합니다. 기존 대여 계약은 모두 조정된 가격으로 갱신됩니다.
#attention
Anonymous Telegram Numbers are now called Collectible Numbers
On February 23, 2026, the number collection on fragment.com was renamed from "Anonymous Telegram Numbers" to "Collectible Numbers."
As you can see, two words were removed: "Anonymous" and "Telegram." The first was removed due to its negative connotations. Numbers are primarily a unique collectible, not a toy for anonymity. The second was most likely remo…
TON DNS Summer (Part 2)
Part 1 is here.
Why is this post on the channel about numbers included in the monthly column?
1. Both Collectible Numbers and numeric domains consist solely of digits. These domains have the potential to become luxury assets, as Collectible Numbers already are.
2. Both 4N domains and Collectible Numbers have their own masks and subcollections, which facilitates easy pricing and marketmakin…
🔥12❤11👍8👏4🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @katesmithrent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 170,061 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kate Smith's Rent” (@katesmithrent), 1,210 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katesmithrent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.