Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TON Messenger

@tonm_app

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

136subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003075814928
TypeChannel
Username@tonm_app
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/tonm_app

Growth

1366 August 2026 — 136 subscribers8 August 2026 — 136 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 135–137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:30136no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:32136first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3621.6%
🔥3621.6%
custom 53776209623908573423521.0%
👍2012.0%
custom 5197288647275071607105.99%
custom 5197371802136892976105.99%
custom 521095630695275891052.99%
custom 529411030977718924352.99%
custom 538406829241769084252.99%
custom 536831492790158090842.40%
👎10.599%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 24 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Feb 2026, 21:09 UTC417 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

One more thing - we forgot to explain the system itself. We spent quite a bit of time thinking through the design, so here is a simpler overview. At first, we considered making every transaction anonymous. But that would create noticeable computational overhead on the user’s device, which is unacceptable for us. We aim for the same level of optimization as Telegram and TON. That means cryptographic operations must b

custom 537762096239085734296🔥4

24 Feb 2026, 20:53 UTC363 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Behind the scenes of building the messenger We believe that everyone in the crypto space values data privacy. Message metadata can reveal just as much as the content itself. Attackers can build social graphs from almost any signal, even timing patterns. For example, if 2 new IDs send short messages to each other in quick succession, it is likely a greeting exchange. In TON, everything is public. However, networks s

custom 51973718021368929764custom 537762096239085734232custom 51972886472750716071

26 Jan 2026, 12:20 UTC371 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

At the moment, we are conducting several research efforts, which is why our activity in the channel has been limited We decided to correct this misleading impression by creating a dedicated chat https://t.me/+zmUdW2PlZQ44MDlk

5

1 Jan 2026, 23:36 UTC639 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Hello everyone 👋 A quick update and some news Earlier, we released our TON Browser for Linux and later asked you which platforms you would like to see it on next. Yesterday, we met with a developer who had been independently working on a similar browser, and today he announced it. In our opinion, this browser truly deserves attention and the status of the main TON Browser in the ecosystem. Key features of new brows

custom 537762096239085734275🔥5custom 51972886472750716072

1 Jan 2026, 10:15 UTC410 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The contest has ended Thank you to everyone for your interest Unfortunately, we have to announce that there are no winners, as no participants took part in the contest Was the prize amount insufficient? Or was the submission period too short? We would appreciate your feedback so we can improve next time After identifying the reason, we may relaunch the contest in the future

5custom 52109563069527589102custom 53683149279015809082

21 Dec 2025, 21:11 UTC546 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

We were going to write a long technical post, but decided to keep it simple We've done a lot of work to design a decentralized network A large part of our audience lives in countries with heavy Internet restrictions. That's why we planned ahead for the worst case: a full shutdown of a country's access to the global Internet. We built an alternative approach that allows the messenger to keep working even under a comp

🔥15custom 53776209623908573426custom 529411030977718924352

12 Dec 2025, 17:47 UTC446 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

What's the level of censorship in your country?

  1. 🟢 1-311%
  2. 🟡 4-613%
  3. 🟠 7-924%
  4. 🔴 10-1251%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Dec 2025, 17:36 UTC419 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

FYI. Internet Censorship: A Map of Internet Censorship and Restrictions (2025) https://www.comparitech.com/blog/vpn-privacy/internet-censorship-map/

4👍2custom 53683149279015809082custom 53776209623908573421

12 Dec 2025, 07:40 UTC476 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

You ask - we build The idea author @brazo has approved the implementation of the inheritance feature in TON Messenger. Smart-contract-based? Of course! In the future, we will add pages for ideas, feedback, and acknowledgements Just know this: we listen and remember every single idea and suggestion you share Want to submit an idea? Get in touch with us

👍9custom 519728864727507160742

8 Dec 2025, 18:27 UTC410 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Just a guess: Theoretically Cocoon could implement software-based confidential compute via tensor masking. This would cut performance by about 5x but would allow models to run almost in "home" on RTX cards. You'd need a server-grade CPU with TEE support for this, but such a setup costs around $2-3k, unlike NVIDIA Hopper series GPUs (H100, H200) that go for $20-30K.

custom 51973718021368929764custom 52109563069527589103custom 53776209623908573421

7 Dec 2025, 14:16 UTC369 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Amazingly, we're wrapping up the vote with a score of 20:0 The poll will stay open for anyone who hasn't had a chance to vote yet - your input matters too Thanks to everyone for the help!

👍1

6 Dec 2025, 13:49 UTC351 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Your choice?

  1. Centralized v111%
  2. Decentralized v189%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 53776209623908573422custom 53840682924176908422

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tonm_app. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Dec 2025, 17:47 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

What's the level of censorship in your country?

  1. 🟢 1-311%
  2. 🟡 4-613%
  3. 🟠 7-924%
  4. 🔴 10-1251%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Dec 2025, 13:49 UTCAnonymous Poll46 voters

Your choice?

  1. Centralized v111%
  2. Decentralized v189%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 24 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 246,509 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TON Messenger” (@tonm_app), 136 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonm_app.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.