Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -1,055. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 204,982–206,353 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 08:43
205,140
-279
11 Aug 2026, 07:01
205,419
-240
10 Aug 2026, 07:36
205,659
-167
9 Aug 2026, 07:12
205,826
-243
8 Aug 2026, 05:50
206,069
-126
7 Aug 2026, 13:00
206,195
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:48
206,195
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 29 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
410
Videos
31
Links
414
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
266 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😭
91
34.2%
🔥
53
19.9%
👍
45
16.9%
❤
35
13.2%
🎉
14
5.26%
😎
12
4.51%
👏
6
2.26%
🤩
6
2.26%
😍
4
1.50%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2025 to 28 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wall_jetton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 January 2025 to 28 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
GM, Воллеры!
TON Foundation своими действиями хоронит экосистему и не дает шансов мем-проектам на выживание. Некомпетентное руководство занято вечными перестановками, их новые президенты продают токены в стакан после вступления на должность, а вся экосистема сместила фокус на подарки и стикеры, забыв про то, с чего начинался бурный рост всего блокчейна. В нашем с вами общем доме, в нашей дружной семье становится пус…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wall_jetton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,088,667 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CIQ LABEL - Крипта, Финансы, Торговля @ciq_label_crypto · 404,599 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
CoLabs: coNFT, CoPump, CoPass @co_nft · 153,714 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
CRYPTO ZARYAD⚡️ @CryptoZaryad · 330,242 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto Profit🛸 @Cr1pto_profit · 421,087 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
WEB3 TON DNS Media @web3tondns · 158,100 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
GOLDMANN HYDRA Community @Ton_HYDRA_Community · 185,748 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
KKX NEWS @kkxnews · 150,351 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
логово ромчика @togetupblud · 210,393 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
CRYPTO METEORA ☄️ @Crypto_Meteora · 334,318 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
$VODKA | MEMECOIN ON $SOL @vodkatokensol · 272,347 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Not Meme @notmeme · 160,990 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Trade Watcher @stockbot · 2,404,709 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
Programmer ♨️ @programmer · 190,905 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
Solanapayouts.com @SolanaPayouts · 191,475 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
OOIA - TON NFT Marketplace @ooiaton · 278,108 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Venture Capital @venture · 2,433,810 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
Startups & Ventures @tech · 2,462,734 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
Everscale News @everscale_news · 290,090 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto Insider @coinmarket · 2,326,423 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Du Rove’s Wall (RU)” (@wall_jetton), 205,140 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wall_jetton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
