Игорь Скурлатов, доктор пол. н., профессор МУПИ, член Союза писателей РФ, Главред сетки ТГ-каналов, Глава РОД-3. Сайт: https://skurlatov.ru/ Реклама: @SkurlatovIgor Почта: izram@ya.ru Регистрация РКН https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/6747a813c577eb7c522bf638
Created
4 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2,389. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,039,727–1,047,457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 03:08
1,043,750
-2,699
11 Aug 2026, 05:13
1,046,449
+5,830
10 Aug 2026, 07:04
1,040,619
-3,225
9 Aug 2026, 06:43
1,043,844
-2,721
8 Aug 2026, 05:02
1,046,565
+3,475
7 Aug 2026, 05:06
1,043,090
-2,444
6 Aug 2026, 07:30
1,045,534
-605
6 Aug 2026, 00:53
1,046,139
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:43
1,046,139
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
34.1%
avg views ÷ 1,043,750 subscribers
Avg views / post
356,000
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
25 (16 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
8,894,400
Reactions total
1,556,081
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,070
Videos
≈1,850
Links
≈4,750
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 53s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 5 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 4of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 4.9 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 28.7% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 49.4% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 307,000 views — 29.4% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 311,100).
5 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
1,514,611 reactions across 24 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
485,990
32.1%
💯
484,350
32.0%
👍
430,800
28.4%
🤬
64,505
4.26%
👎
48,966
3.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,556,081reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
183
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 25 we hold a reading for · 64%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skurlatovlive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
8.00%
2 of 25 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
285,000
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
331,000
over 23 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvBi8SP
2
5 August 2026
12 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🇷🇺 ОЭЗ «Алабуга» открывает набор сотрудников на высокотехнологическое производство.
Мы предлагаем:
🔹 Заработную плату до 217 500 ₽ на старте после вычета НДФЛ;
🔹 Работу без опыта и профессионального образования;
🔹 Официальное трудоустройство
🔹 Корпоративные хостелы для иногородних;
🔹 Вахта из соседних городов;
🔹 График 2/2 с 8.00 до 20.00 (дневные и ночные смены);
🔹 Работу в лучшей экономической зоне России;
Переез…
➡️"Демократия - не для нищих". Продолжение. Начало здесь.
Однако права человека – пустые абстракции, если за ними не стоит экономическая независимость человека от государства, общины, работодателя. Хорошо известно, что всеобщее избирательное право в странах с бедным населением служит орудием авторитаризма, тирании и произвола. У нищих нет экономической опоры разума, они заняты животным выживанием, им некогда и незач…
Демократия — не для нищих
Недооценивают книжники и теоретики простую истину, выраженную в русской пословице «без денег и разума нет». Экономически-зависимый человек живет не по собственному разуму, а волей-неволей следует мнениям того или тех, от чего или кого зависит. Другими словами, необходимое (но недостаточное) условие быть субъектным — быть экономически-самодостаточным (=богатым). Соответственно демократия – э…
🔝 5️⃣0️⃣ Рейтинг самых авторитетных каналов политического сегмента Телеграм за неделю 03.08.26 - 10.08.26 г. по ЦИТИРОВАНИЮ в Телеграм по данным статистического сервиса "Телеметр" (с учётом удельного веса упоминаний на один пост и количества публикаций) от социологического отдела Экспертного Совета учёных РАН.
1. Дмитрий Медведев (2527 упоминаний в других ТГ-каналах)
2. Вячеслав Володин (2244)
3. Скурлатов live (165…
При сотрудничестве с Международным общественным Трибуналом вводим на канале новую рубрику - "Свидетельства зверств укронеонацистов в отношении российских военнопленных". …
Перед материнским инстинктом бессильны даже очень высокие каменные стены.
В Китае кошка ради котят, оставшихся по другую сторону и отчаянно зовущих мать, совершила невозможное. Раз за разом она штурмовала каменную кладку, цепляясь когтями, падая вниз, но не сдалась и преодолела препятствие (см. видео).
Так и РОД-3 клянется до последней капли крови пытаться спасти страну, народ от измены и лжи, бороться за справедли…
🇷🇺 ОЭЗ «Алабуга» открывает набор сотрудников на высокотехнологическое производство.
Мы предлагаем:
🔹 Заработную плату от 130 500 ₽ на руки + подъемные 150 000 ₽ (по 50 000 ₽ в течение 3 месяцев);
🔹 Работу без опыта и профессионального образования;
🔹 Официальное трудоустройство
🔹 Корпоративные хостелы для иногородних;
🔹 Вахта из соседних городов;
🔹 График 2/2 с 8.00 до 20.00 (дневные и ночные смены);
🔹 Работу в лучше…
Если теракт укрорейха на пляже в Геленджике, повлекший гибель детей, женщин и ранения десятков отдыхающих, не "красная линия", то плохи дела в "нашем королевстве".
РОД-3 предлагает то, что предлагало всегда - перестать изображать из себя агнцов - уничтожить главарей укрофашистской хунты, пункты военно-политического управления в Киеве и освободить-таки всю нашу Украину (Малороссию) до границ с Польшей от необандеровс…
Революция сознания во многих "башнях" Кремля идёт недостаточно интенсивно.
Неоднократно подчёркивал, что переназревшие перемены во внешней и внутренней политике могут быть инициированы и решены только Президентом в силу существующего формата функционирования государства.
Возможно ли такое?
Будем оптимистами и верить, что да.
Хотя для такого оптимизма есть не так много оснований, не смотря на титаническую работу в…
🔝 5️⃣0️⃣ Рейтинг самых авторитетных каналов политического сегмента Телеграм за неделю 27.07.26 - 03.08.26 г. ПО ЦИТИРОВАНИЮ в Телеграм по данным статистического сервиса "Телеметр" (с учётом удельного веса упоминаний на один пост и количества публикаций) от социологического отдела Экспертного Совета учёных РАН.
1. Дмитрий Медведев (2646 упоминаний в других ТГ-каналах)
2. Вячеслав Володин (2284)
3. Скурлатов live (172…
Стесняюсь спросить - а почему людоед, подонок и просто иудская русофобская гадина зеленский с бандой головорезов укрорейха, виновник гибели многих тысяч наших бойцов, мирных женщин, стариков и детей, вместе с рыжим гаденышем трампом и его шестерками, не удостаивается российского юридического звания и статуса террорист?
Главарь необандеры однако у нас в стране не признается таковым. Не заслужил типа? Вроде вполне, дл…
Стройбатам - быть! По следам наших выступлений.
Владимир Путин подписал указ об увеличении штатной численности вооруженных сил в связи с созданием военно-строительных подразделений. Этот документ стал новым этапом реформы военно-строительного комплекса, начатой Минобороны в прошлом году, и первым опубликованным нормативным актом, прямо фиксирующим воссоздание таких подразделений в составе армии.
Таким образом, усил…
🔥27,500💯24,700👍21,700🤬1,690👎1,410
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @skurlatovlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@skurlatovlive edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 4,603 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 114 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@skurlatovlive named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@scenario13 named in 9 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Зона особого внимания @zonaosoboho · 156,290 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
9 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Скурлатов live” (@skurlatovlive), 1,043,750 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skurlatovlive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
