ВЫПУСК «ЖИВАЯ КУКЛА» от 30.09.2026 📲 М/Ж в макс

Channel
Мужское Женское. Редакция
@dorogoemj
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,774subscribers
-250 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001756443258 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dorogoemj |
| Description | Загляни за кулисы любимой телепередачи «Мужское/Женское» вместе с её создателями Заявление в РКН № 5136318566 Сотрудничество 📩@Dorogoemj_connect_bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dorogoemj |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 21,774 | -49 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 21,823 | +24 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 21,799 | -15 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 21,814 | -21 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:36 | 21,835 | -20 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 21,855 | -27 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 21,882 | -36 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 21,918 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 21,930 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 21,950 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:53 | 21,961 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 21,972 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 21,974 | +22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 21,952 | +8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 21,944 | +34 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 21,910 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 21,920 | -15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 21,935 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 21,948 | +23 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 21,925 | first reading |
Engagement
153 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.87%
- avg views ÷ 21,774 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 842
- 42 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.10%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 42
- of 153 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 153 (5 August 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 35,346 |
| Reactions total | 358 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,530
- Videos
- ≈2,090
- Links
- ≈3,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 38m 24s
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,309 reactions across 123 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 240 | 18.3% | |
| 😱 | 224 | 17.1% | |
| ❤ | 216 | 16.5% | |
| 👍 | 103 | 7.87% | |
| 👎 | 96 | 7.33% | |
| 🤯 | 74 | 5.65% | |
| 😢 | 67 | 5.12% | |
| 🤡 | 53 | 4.05% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 3.82% | |
| 😨 | 24 | 1.83% | |
| 🤝 | 24 | 1.83% | |
| 😭 | 20 | 1.53% | |
| 👀 | 16 | 1.22% | |
| 🕊 | 14 | 1.07% | |
| 🤔 | 13 | 0.993% | |
| 🤨 | 12 | 0.917% | |
| 🤮 | 8 | 0.611% | |
| 💊 | 7 | 0.535% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 0.535% | |
| 🤷♂ | 7 | 0.535% | |
| 12 further kinds | 34 | 2.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 126 of the 153 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,309 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Обсуждаем новый выпуск «ЧТО МНЕ ВОЛЯ, ЧТО НЕВОЛЯ!» 📺 Сегодня в эфире, разбираемся в непростой истории🤔 Волонтёр Алексей из Москвы переживает за судьбу Ольги и её трёхлетней дочки - их пришлось вызволять из рабочего дома на окраине города вместе с полицией. Идти Ольге некуда: из-за конфликта с родственниками она не может вернуться в родительский дом. Родственники же уверены - Ольга сама виновата, пропила и прогулял…
🤝8
Друзья, нам нужна ваша помощь! 🙏 В нашей студии мы обсуждаем самые острые и важные темы, которые волнуют нас самих! 🔥 А что интересно вам? Делитесь! 💬✍️
🔥2
ВЫПУСК «ЧТО МНЕ ВОЛЯ, ЧТО НЕВОЛЯ!» от 29.09.2026 📲 М/Ж в макс
👍3❤1
Обсуждаем новый выпуск «СЕМЬ ПОТЕРЯННЫХ ДЕТЕЙ»! 📺Сегодня в эфире - история, от которой сжимается сердце. Татьяна из Челябинской области хочет лишить родительских прав сноху Оксану: та пьёт 20 лет, дети в антисанитарии, выплаты погибшего мужа пропивает. Сейчас дети в реабилитационном центре. Оксана хочет вылечиться и вернуть детей, а Татьяна, по её словам, действует из выгоды. А вы уже посмотрели выпуск? 🤔 Давайте …
❤8🤝8
🤫 У нас тут назревает большой разговор 🗣️ Тема, которую сейчас обсуждают все. Интервью, после которого вопросов стало ещё больше. А мы решили разобраться. 👀 Давайте обсудим и поболтаем!💭 Смотрите видео и делитесь мнением в комментариях ⬇️
❤2
💸Жительница Прикамья отсудила 4 млн руб. за гибель ребенка в утробе из-за халатности врачей В ноябре 2023 года беременную женщину с сильной болью в животе несколько раз перевозили между больницами Краснокамска и Перми на протяжении 4 часов. Врачи не могли установить причину ухудшения состояния. Ребёнок погиб, а женщине провели операцию по удалению матки. Судебно-медицинская экспертиза подтвердила ненадлежащее оказа…
😢4👍2❤1
Мошенники обманули мать четверых детей из Москвы на 180 тысяч рублей — они обещали ей выступление в шоу «Поле чудес», но перестали выходить на связь. Как рассказала «Базе» Алёна, она занимается музыкой и преподаёт вокал. Однажды ей написала девушка, которая заявила, что имеет связи на телевидении и может помочь начинающим артистам попасть в эфир и заодно пополнить портфолио. За свои «связи» она попросила 180 тысяч р…
😢7
ВЫПУСК «СЕМЬ ПОТЕРЯННЫХ ДЕТЕЙ» от 28.09.2026 📲 М/Ж в макс
❤5
🎬 А вот так перед началом недели наши продюсеры решают, что будет в эфире!📺 Скажем честно - это всегда жаркие споры 🔥 Потому что мы хотим, чтобы каждый выпуск был не просто эфиром, а настоящим разговором, который касается каждого. 💬 И да - мы работаем для вас! ❤️
❤12🔥4💘1
🎁 Дорогие подписчики, у нас для вас сюрприз!✨ Мы поняли, что в последнее время в нашем канале стало тихо. А ведь мы вас очень любим и хотим общаться чаще! 🗣️ Поэтому решили сделать шаг навстречу и познакомить вас с теми, кто создает «Мужское/Женское» каждый день!
❤18🔥3💘2❤🔥1👍1
В какой соцсети вы сидите больше всего?
- Макс6%
- Телеграмм92%
- Не сижу в соцсетях2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 153 posts we hold for @dorogoemj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В какой соцсети вы сидите больше всего?
- Макс6%
- Телеграмм92%
- Не сижу в соцсетях2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какую стезю вы бы посоветовали современному поколению?
- 🛠 Рабочие (крафт, производство)31%
- 📐 Инженерные (техника, расчеты)32%
- 🎨 Творческие (дизайн, искусство)17%
- 💼 Офисные (менеджмент, IT)15%
- ✍️ Другое (свой вариант в комментариях)5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А что вам больше по душе?
- Арбуз 🍉46%
- Дыня 🍈23%
- Люблю одинаково ❤️30%
- Не люблю совсем ❌5%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@manwoman1tv · 77,98925 postsBaza
@bazabazon · 1,565,29318 postsРЕН ТВ|Новости
@rentv_news · 113,38214 postsAmur Mash
@amur_mash · 53,93213 postsКомсомольская правда: KP.RU
@truekpru · 285,42413 postsKras Mash
@kras_mash · 50,1597 postsSHOT
@shot_shot · 1,265,6577 postsКП - Новосибирск
@nskkp · 10,6826 posts360.ru
@tv360 · 200,7994 postsURA.RU
@uranews · 220,5794 postsMash на Мойке
@mashmoyka · 342,0283 postsЧП НТВ
@chpntv · 248,0702 postsE1.RU | Новости Екатеринбурга
@e1_news · 430,6742 postsKub Mash
@kub_mash · 114,3082 postsSHOT ПРОВЕРКА
@shot_proverka · 123,3412 postsСводка Хабаровск | Новости Хабаровска
@svodka_khv · 74,9392 postsUral Mash
@url_mash · 67,2172 postsНовости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,668,8201 postReadovka
@readovkanews · 2,014,9011 postСаратов 24
@saratov24ru · 93,2211 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@manwoman1tv · 77,98919 postsBaza
@bazabazon · 1,565,29316 postsКомсомольская правда: KP.RU
@truekpru · 285,42413 postsКП - Новосибирск
@nskkp · 10,6826 postsURA.RU
@uranews · 220,5794 postsSHOT
@shot_shot · 1,265,6572 postsЧелябинск, который смог | URA.RU
@ACityThatSmog · 27,1311 postAmur Mash
@amur_mash · 53,9321 postMash
@mash · 3,110,5861 postСаратов 24
@saratov24ru · 93,2211 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@moscowach · 4,076,789#1
@proektshmel · 122,771#2
@lyubimyivpsh · 143,446#3
@retail_kitchen · 65,983#4
@unpleasent · 491,819#5
@kanalnekiy · 181,175#6
@pravdadirty · 1,395,339#7
@mash · 3,110,586#8
@maslennikovliga · 2,134,958#9
@kosti · 560,192#10
@petrovtel · 525,264#11
@femalememes · 407,543#12
@tinyukov · 61,612#13
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,401#14
@moscowmap · 2,668,820#15
@milanapetrovaqueen · 201,434#16
@bazabazon · 1,565,293#17
@br1anm7ps · 1,090,016#18
@anthonyuly · 233,890#19
@shot_shot · 1,265,657#20
@TrudovoyDrive · 58,097#21
@msk_live · 1,804,158#22
@moscowplus · 1,203,514#23
@konasovatut · 79,238#24
@deadblonde · 155,137#25
@klientvsprav · 1,054,580#26
@uchannelofficial · 46,960#27
@mashmoyka · 342,028#28
@shastoonchannel · 234,676#29
@KateClappTelegram · 171,584#30
@kinopoisk · 804,634#31
@topapopa · 367,269#32
@files_zhuravlya · 181,680#33
@pyrokinesistg · 142,493#34
@zhenforum · 171,503#35
@sketchup_parfenyuk · 128,918#36
@bridge_ew · 222,222#37
@mfedorm · 1,858#38
@usachevruslan · 198,712#39
@pozov · 255,112#40
@dusnilaparty · 110,276#41
@gryaznov1982 · 204#42
@faust21century · 73,568#43
@bodydzen · 3,082 (as read 22 September 2026)#44
@imtelesov · 499#45
@russian_ecom · 83,039#46
@ybaranovskaya_tv · 46,422#47
@kbelchik · 65,382#48
@klikklaktg · 90,164#49
@kim_real · 7,237#50
@ca11_you · 141,037#51
@bananshina · 34,462#52
@fridaytv · 347,082#53
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 912,690#54
@DKNASASAL · 390,717#55
@juliusspeak · 111,480#56
@ildargame · 5,300#57
@everydayrain · 237,282#58
@IAMFAKEMUKKA · 64,191#59
@sibirskytg · 83,069#60
@sasha1karat · 80,461#61
@aivashev · 14,322#62
@eveliinushka · 79,563#63
@olyaredautumn · 107,501#64
@Kuplinov_Alerts · 62,302#65
@varjauletelaKANAL · 50,940#66
@ebanutie_otkritki · 62,389#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@uchannelofficial · 46,960
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 September 2026
@unpleasent · 491,819
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
@ybaranovskaya_tv · 46,422
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
@kanalnekiy · 181,175
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мужское Женское. Редакция” (@dorogoemj), 21,774 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dorogoemj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.