Это мы на ужин еще не выходили… 🫣🤪 могу хоть посидеть в телефоне! Урааа
👍173custom 528733798387000689380😁22🔥6custom 53484608617552622511

Channel
@pushmanjulia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
187,189subscribers
-414 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001481220570 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pushmanjulia |
| Description | Сотрудничество: ᴀᴅ.ᴘᴜsʜᴍᴀɴ@ɢᴍᴀɪʟ.ᴄᴏᴍ @annaprosto - TG Регистрация канала: https://clck.ru/3G6YSe |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pushmanjulia |
Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 187,189 | -73 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 187,262 | -81 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 187,343 | -124 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 187,467 | -63 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 187,530 | -73 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 187,603 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,642,600 |
| Reactions total | 25,709 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
25,709 reactions across 32 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5287337983870006893 | 11,904 | 46.3% | |
| 🔥 | 7,341 | 28.6% | |
| 😁 | 2,295 | 8.93% | |
| 😱 | 2,291 | 8.91% | |
| 👍 | 1,494 | 5.81% | |
| custom 5348460861755262251 | 384 | 1.49% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,709reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pushmanjulia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Это мы на ужин еще не выходили… 🫣🤪 могу хоть посидеть в телефоне! Урааа
👍173custom 528733798387000689380😁22🔥6custom 53484608617552622511
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥200custom 5287337983870006893114😁93custom 53484608617552622513
Фото без детей 😁 редкие кадры
🔥623custom 5287337983870006893136😁33👍3custom 53484608617552622513
🤍 тусим постоянно такой компанией. Мой отчим и брат Саша двигаются в другом ритме. Раньше встают, раньше выходят и тд 😅 а мы с мамой и детьми пока из дома выйдем… пока всех намоем после бассейна/моря…😁 Да, определенно отдых с детьми сильно отличается от отдыха без детей маленьких, но это все равно лучше - чем вообще не ехать никуда. Отдыхаем хорошо, благодарю за возможность проводить так много времени со своей ма…
🔥616custom 5287337983870006893234custom 534846086175526225143😁7😱3👍2
А я бы вот многое отдала за один день из 2006… 🥹 Выйти гулять без портативной зарядки, сделать 48 фоток на телефон, из которых нормальная примерно одна, скинуть подруге песню и ждать ее вечность, а потом услышать из окна «ЮЛЯЯЯ, ДОМОЙ» 😭 Т-Банк в этом году отмечает 20 лет и по этому поводу собрал целую квартиру №2006 — с теми самыми вещами, деталями и вайбом нулевых 💛 Внутри для «квартирантов» спрятаны специальные…
custom 528733798387000689395🔥18😁17custom 53484608617552622515👍3
Я думаю это тот самый момент 🤪
custom 5287337983870006893454😁210😱117custom 534846086175526225114
-2 дня отпуска Или ротавирус или кишечная палочка… не ясно… но один день было очень плохо. Пила лекарства - помогли. На следующий день сильно болел живот и решили поехать в клинику и поставить капельницу. Один день вообще не ела. Спала весь день. Знобило, потела… пздц просто
😱595custom 528733798387000689389custom 534846086175526225124
Не пить воду из бассейна в аквапарке 📝
😁501😱156custom 534846086175526225182custom 528733798387000689321👍7
🥺❤️🩹
😱530custom 528733798387000689381custom 534846086175526225121
💖 моя зефирка Обожаю Анюточку свою. Она самая лучшая девочка на свете! Самая добрая, умная, заботливая, милая и красивая! Хотя характер у нее конечно мама не горюй 😅 а сейчас то ли кризис 3 лет разбушевался, то ли она ревнует всех к Руслану… пока не ясно, но иногда кажется что после такого отпуска нужен еще один отпуск 😅😁 Эта фотка стоила нам двух разборок с Аней с выяснениями отношений. Сейчас постоянные «не хоч…
🔥928custom 5287337983870006893370👍59😁35
Иногда лучший план на вечер — отменить все планы…☺️ Включить тёплый душ, скачать любимый сериал и устроить себе домашний уход, после которого кожа будет как после спа… Ну кому уже захотелось, признавайтесь 🥹🥰 Сейчас для таких вечеров использую крио-скраб для тела «Северное сияние» от бренда «Для кожи да»! Он работает сразу в нескольких направлениях: 🤍 натуральный ментол даёт приятный крио-эффект 🤍 массаж помогае…
👍154custom 528733798387000689342🔥39😁5
Ане 3 года | Сколько стоила лестница в дом | Привезли кровать и диван | бамбуковые панели https://youtu.be/kcTKzbse3Qs
🔥286custom 5287337983870006893102😁23👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @pushmanjulia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 438,678 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pushman” (@pushmanjulia), 187,189 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pushmanjulia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.