Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мира

Channel

Мира

@mira_att

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

379,578subscribers

+11,116 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001525250468
TypeChannel
Username@mira_att
Descriptionздесь о косметике, уходе за собой и жизни 🤍 по рекламе: @AsyaSam1 https://inlnk.ru/VoLeDV
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mira_att

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

368,358379,578373,9686 August 2026 — 368,462 subscribers7 August 2026 — 368,358 subscribers8 August 2026 — 368,402 subscribers9 August 2026 — 369,142 subscribers10 August 2026 — 370,461 subscribers11 August 2026 — 370,472 subscribers12 August 2026 — 372,449 subscribers13 August 2026 — 374,702 subscribers15 August 2026 — 377,522 subscribers16 August 2026 — 378,985 subscribers17 August 2026 — 379,239 subscribers18 August 2026 — 379,418 subscribers19 August 2026 — 379,514 subscribers20 August 2026 — 379,508 subscribers21 August 2026 — 379,578 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net +11,116. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 366,675–381,261 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 19:28379,578+70
20 Aug 2026, 17:24379,508-6
19 Aug 2026, 18:33379,514+96
18 Aug 2026, 18:05379,418+179
17 Aug 2026, 18:26379,239+254
16 Aug 2026, 17:46378,985+1,463
15 Aug 2026, 01:45377,522+2,820
13 Aug 2026, 14:58374,702+2,253
12 Aug 2026, 16:33372,449+1,977
11 Aug 2026, 13:34370,472+11
10 Aug 2026, 15:52370,461+1,319
9 Aug 2026, 15:13369,142+740
8 Aug 2026, 14:24368,402+44
7 Aug 2026, 13:35368,358-104
6 Aug 2026, 23:48368,462first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.0%
avg views ÷ 379,578 subscribers
Avg views / post
98,500
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held29 (3 August 202621 August 2026)
Views total2,857,100
Reactions total152,624
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,610
Videos
736
Links
127

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 53s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

152,624 reactions across 29 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
112,30073.6%
🔥15,26010.00%
🥰10,6636.99%
😍9,0515.93%
🤣2,0981.37%
💯8760.574%
💔8510.558%
😱7960.522%
😢7290.478%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152,624reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
126
across the posts below
Posts paid on
25
of 29 we hold a reading for · 86%
Most on one post
26
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mira_att. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC≈64,100 views5,098 reactions6 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

удалось сделать ровный и даже немного светлый оттенок, и мне нравится🥹 правда, он будет постепенно вымываться, поэтому теперь нужно примерно раз в месяц ходить на тонирование, чтобы поддерживать цвет, замаскировать седину и избежать появления светлых проплешин кстати, первые седые волосы стали у меня появляться еще в 19 лет.. а у вас как?

3,730🔥692😍494😱73💯45🥰42🤣18💔4

21 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC≈68,800 views3,915 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026
Photo

все-таки спустя время я пожалела, что когда-то сделала светлые пряди 🥲 в итоге поняла, что моей внешности гораздо больше подходит однородный цвет волос, поэтому решила вернуться к нему полностью и БОЛЬШЕ не экспериментировать с оттенками, только со стрижками и текстурой))) хотя, никогда не говори никогда..

2,840🔥531😍418😱35💯33🥰23💔16😢16

20 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC≈86,600 views5,738 reactions2 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Сэм отвез меня с утра пораньше позавтракать и на окрашивание волос! хочу сравнять цвет волос, убрать выбивающиеся светлые пряди, апгрейднуть образ)) займет это 5-6 часов со смывкой и тонированием..🥺

4,340🥰774🔥418😍92😱75💯20💔9😢9

19 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈89,900 views5,310 reactions7 Starsread 22 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3,490😍873🔥582🤣206🥰126💔33

19 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈92,800 views8,806 reactions9 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

контролирующий орган встретил в месте прилета, все по плану 😁

6,280😍1,420🔥808🥰180🤣92💯17😱9

19 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC≈96,300 views6,831 reactions2 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

вылетаю к мужу в его родной город Пятигорск! он уехал туда пару дней назад, вся его семья сейчас там :) еду к ним проведать родителей и немного развеяться 💖

5,050🥰942🔥705😍56💯29💔24😱14🤣9

18 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈105,000 views8,409 reactions3 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

вижу очень много ваших вопросов о том, почему мы хотим пожить именно в Дубае 👀 причин сразу несколько. я давно мечтала хотя бы раз перезимовать в тепле, но одной мне было бы страшно решиться, а для Сэма Дубай еще и очень удобен с точки зрения работы: его бизнес связан с зарубежными поставщиками.. а мне в плане работы вообще не принципиально, где находиться — я могу снимать контент практически откуда угодно 🥺 а там б

6,240🔥1,240🥰717😍84💯47😢39😱20🤣16

18 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈96,900 views7,307 reactions2 Starsread 22 August 2026
Photo

забавно вспоминать, как я в детстве ругала свои волосы, ненавидела их за пушистость, пористость и кудрявость.. а сейчас я считаю это своим самым большим достоинством и украшением 🥹

5,440🔥934😍681💯85🥰78💔42🤣37😱10

18 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈101,000 views5,366 reactions3 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

наш мозг устроен так, что намного сильнее замечает негатив. поэтому сейчас специально стараюсь делать фокус на хорошем и меньше концентрироваться на плохом.. не всегда получается, конечно, но я постепенно этому учусь) у моего мужа тоже есть такая привычка.. мы оба склонны обесценивать себя и свои достижения, хотя я всегда удивляюсь его уму! и когда вижу, что он начинает зацикливаться на негативе, стараюсь его подде

4,060🥰631😍423🔥67💯65😱47💔46🤣17

17 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈108,000 views7,893 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

кажется, в ближайшее время в нашей жизни будут серьезные перемены..

5,640🔥1,100🥰669😱251😢83💔57💯52😍29

13 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC≈193,000 views7,193 reactions7 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

как же здорово дружить семьями, строить планы, проводить время вместе🥹 почему мы сошлись: — так же любят вкусно поесть, как и мы — простые в общении, без "понтов" — не пытаются кем-то казаться, можем быть собой — любим черный юмор — на шутливые подколы не обижаемся, а жестче подкалываем в ответ))) — не завистливы, умеют радоваться чужому счастью и разделять его — могут и в ресторан с тобой сходить, и посидеть дома в

5,340🔥1,020🥰697😍59💯49😱10🤣9💔6

13 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈153,000 views12,421 reactions26 Starsread 19 August 2026
Photo

на нашей свадьбе в качестве сюрприза показывали кружочки, которые Сэм отправлял брату Карену после нашей первой встречи, и кружочек, который отправляла я своим подругам после нашего первого свидания.. так забавно наблюдать за нами, за этими первыми эмоциями и чувствами.. мы тогда даже не предполагали, что через два года поженимся🤯

8,730🥰1,960🔥959😍316💔310🤣60💯46😢39

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @mira_att. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 268,143 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мира” (@mira_att), 379,578 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mira_att.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.