Channel
@prAtein_no
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,651subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001389112374 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prAtein_no |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prAtein_no |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 23,651 | +17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 23,634 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 23,645 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 23,644 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 23,640 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 23,650 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 23,650 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (23 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 353,040 |
| Reactions total | 5,525 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,525 reactions across 24 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 3,281 | 59.4% | |
| ❤ | 1,461 | 26.4% | |
| 👍 | 572 | 10.4% | |
| 😱 | 93 | 1.68% | |
| 🤔 | 89 | 1.61% | |
| 😢 | 29 | 0.525% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,525reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
К посту выше, вот кстати хороший пример снижения индекса массы тела на оземпике/семаглутид. Человек при этом в зал не ходил, но 10к шагов и много физической активности у него было. Результат на скриншоте - это почти год использования препарата в стандартной дозировке. Надёжный шоп Чат ПрАтеин
❤29😁11👍3😢3
Нормисы видимо ждали от инновационного препарата полного отсутствия побочек - за то, что он борется с одним из самых распространённых факторов смерти? Просто для справки, есть один страшный препарат у которого: • Тошнота — до 34 % • Рвота — до 15 % • Головная боль ≈ 10 % • Бессонница ≈ 7 % И это парацетамол ) 0 Все мы хотим похудеть за счёт того, что утром выпили воду с лимоном или посмотрели на пачку соды пере…
❤43😁35👍10😱4🤔1
Продолжаем делиться умным нет фитнес контентом на прАтеине. - Картофель вредный, патамушта крахмал - таблица продуктов с крахмалом 💁♂️ - В картофеле нет НИКАКИХ витаминов - таблица 💁♂️ - В картофеле нет НИКАКИХ микроэлементов - таблица 💁♂️ Тезисно и по сути, любой вид углевод нежелательно есть на постоянке, если вы только не китаец, который уже тысяч лет практически не слезают с риса. Самый бесполезный овощ мы …
😁130👍26❤13😱6
Как думаете, сколько стоит на озоне САМЫЙ дешёвый сывороточный «протеин» ? 700 рублей за 900 грамм. И 900 рублей за 1000 грамм (на котором 2000 отзывов) Нормальный Gold standard стоит 6000 рублей за 900 грамм. Вот что я хочу сказать этим сравнением 👇 Ничего, просто охуевайте от разброса цен и лотереи по качеству. Надёжный шоп Чат ПрАтеин
😁78❤32👍2
Андрей Смаев ушёл из своих рф ресурсов, но оставил свое присутствие в Пашином ТГ, откуда делаются репосты в основу. Это как бывшая, которая после соры демонстративно удалила страницу в ВК, но сидит в аське 💃 Эмоционального здоровья Андрею, пусть уже вырастет, возвращается в медиа и перестанет страдать этой х#ней 🤝 Надёжный шоп Чат ПрАтеин
😁233👍51❤17😱1
Где выступает этот силач ? В федерации ПМС ? - Мама, вызывай такси, мне подход на 125 кг запороли ! Надёжный шоп Чат ПрАтеин
😁402❤25😱11😢6
Как же хорошо, что в интернете есть такие прекрасные специалисты, которые разбираются буквально во всех направлениях сразу, арм, паверлифтинг, ББ, сушка, набор массы. Во всем шарит 🫡 И этому ему ещё 15 лет, представляете что будет в 18, в 20 ? Книгу напишет, свою школу откроет, станет главным тренером сборной с дцп ? П. С: только не надо негативные и завистливые комментарии, ок ? Надёжный шоп Чат ПрАтеин
😁192❤28👍20
Ушёл из русскоговорящего медиа, но оставил реквизиты 🫡 *Реквизиты Паши Надёжный шоп Чат ПрАтеин
😁323❤24👍15
Немного интересного оффтопа. Почему многие девушки, предпочитают парней с ростом от 180/185 сантиметров ? Дело в том, что нередко девушки встречающие парней с заявленным ростом «1.75 сантиметров», видят перед собой фактический рост 1.65 например. Из-за этого произошёл сантиметровый демпинг, который чаще всего не имеет ничего общего с настоящим ростом. Что-то мне подсказывает, это не единственные сантиметры о котор…
😁168🤔39❤10👍1
Наклоны с волной в позвоночнике (с) Что движет этими людьми ? Что заставляет их «развивать гипер-мобильность» с большим весом, там где оно не предусмотрено природой и здравым смыслом ? Особенно отмечу, как она после 5 дней от ОСТРОЙ боли впсине спине, идёт на рекорды в ТОМ ЖЕ самом движении, где ранее и ПОЛУЧИЛА травму. Выводы ? Хуеводы ! ГЕНИАЛЬНО ! Лучшая 🫡
😁182😢16❤7👍3
В чем секрет таких крутых рук Киркорова ? Тренировки и правильная диета?
😁245🤔17❤6
Мелкие проверяют бицепс Андрея на наличие фармакологии. Можете не проверять, там только ГЗТ и тестостерон «в рамках реферах» 👍
😁152❤36
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @prAtein_no. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@prAtein_no edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 747,649 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПрАтеин” (@prAtein_no), 23,651 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prAtein_no.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.