Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сильный БОРЩ

Channel

Сильный БОРЩ

@strongborsh

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,278subscribers

-485 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001110849556
TypeChannel
Username@strongborsh
DescriptionГриша Борщ и его пивная арена На счёт онлайн-тренинга и консультаций - писать менеджеру https://t.me/borsh_manager Поддержать: https://patreon.com/GrishaBorsh https://boosty.to/grishaborsh
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/strongborsh

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24,27824,76324,520.57 August 2026 — 24,763 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,763 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,760 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,752 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,747 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,732 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,724 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,721 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,702 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,684 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,676 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,668 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,663 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,652 subscribers21 August 2026 — 24,641 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,640 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,633 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,628 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,614 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,601 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,595 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,576 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,558 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,553 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,518 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,497 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,469 subscribers5 September 2026 — 24,450 subscribers8 September 2026 — 24,417 subscribers11 September 2026 — 24,400 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24,392 subscribers14 September 2026 — 24,381 subscribers16 September 2026 — 24,357 subscribers19 September 2026 — 24,335 subscribers25 September 2026 — 24,278 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net -485. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,205–24,836 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 06:4024,278-57
19 Sept 2026, 01:0124,335-22
16 Sept 2026, 19:4124,357-24
14 Sept 2026, 22:1824,381-11
13 Sept 2026, 05:3924,392-8
11 Sept 2026, 09:4024,400-17
8 Sept 2026, 18:5624,417-33
5 Sept 2026, 11:3724,450-19
3 Sept 2026, 15:4024,469-28
2 Sept 2026, 07:0824,497-21
1 Sept 2026, 07:1324,518-35
31 Aug 2026, 07:1924,553-5
30 Aug 2026, 06:0524,558-18
29 Aug 2026, 05:4324,576-19
28 Aug 2026, 08:1324,595-6
27 Aug 2026, 07:5724,601-13
26 Aug 2026, 08:0424,614-14
25 Aug 2026, 09:2524,628-5
24 Aug 2026, 12:3524,633-7
22 Aug 2026, 22:5524,640first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 24,278 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,140
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total8,140
Reactions total391
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 06:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
644
Videos
561
Links
361

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,428 reactions across 20 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,43054.9%
🔥70115.8%
👍53012.0%
❤‍🔥2756.21%
🕊1613.64%
⚡1082.44%
😭390.881%
🤝370.836%
🐳340.768%
🫡260.587%
🗿170.384%
👀120.271%
🙏120.271%
💔110.248%
🏆70.158%
🤯60.136%
😢40.09%
☃30.068%
🌭30.068%
🍓20.045%
7 further kinds100.226%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,428 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 20 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @strongborsh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC≈8,140 views391 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

Присед тоже уже 635 сделал,решили не записывать,следующий шаг надо серьезнее сделать. Да и я(вроде кое-как)обжился на новом месте,осень пора железа и риса со стейками,так что пора возвращаться с качалко-контентом. Например,какие темы сейчас в тренде среди нас,чтобы мы вставили их с Вадимом в новый выпуск «Как дела в качалке»? Напишите под постом,или ставьте реакции на уже написаные кем-то👌

❤285🔥58👍30⚡10☃3❤‍🔥2🍾2🌭1

10 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC≈14,200 views242 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Как выглядит человек выполняющий рекорд в категории до 100кг при весе 110+. Как говорится,вот и думайте,как работает эта формула🗿 upd. Правила позволяют, есть силы пользоваться - не вижу проблем,Хаак красавец, как и всегда Alltime 1044кг в наколенниках,коэффициент 645.1 dots,

❤183🔥36👀12👍4⚡2❤‍🔥2🗿2🐳1

30 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC≈13,700 views147 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Под одним из прошлых постов меня спросили, насколько сильно отличается мой результат в жиме с носка и с пятки. Ответ - никак. Такие эксперименты я записывал уже много раз. В моем случае мост в первую очередь нужен не для сокращения амплитуды, а для безопасного распределения нагрузки. Он позволяет равномернее ее разложить, чтобы не получить новый отрыв и сохранить здоровье плеч. О помощи моста в сокращении амплитуд…

❤95👍32🔥17🐳2❤‍🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈10,100 views116 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Ролик про спину был хорош,кстати.Сейчас студию доделаю в гараже,продолжу снимать похожие https://youtu.be/aW5W9D6_c2s?is=nco0bgIgdixHWpUx

❤86👍26❤‍🔥3😁1

29 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC≈10,400 views128 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Я,кажется,знаю,как решить проблемы с вашей спиной. Кликбейт? возможно ,но если бы у нас была возможность посмотреть на временную линию своей жизни в ускоренном режиме,то многие сильно удивились бы. Потому что окажется,что со штангой мы проводим часа полтора в день. А вот в кровати треть всей жизни. И самое забавное,что когда начинает болеть спина,первым подозреваемым почти всегда становится зал,буквально корень вс…

❤93👍14🙏12⚡6🔥2🤣1

27 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC≈8,810 views330 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Video

Давно,достаточно давно не заходил на такие веса в седе. Рад вернуться 🤙 Между делом побил рекорд зала в седе (565lb) целых 2 раза,575lb(261кг) и 605lb (275кг). Чувствую то,что хотел чувствовать,так что работаем. Свой вес около 115-117

🔥231❤62👍27🏆7⚡3

22 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC≈13,700 views398 reactions2 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Забавный факт. Меня часто спрашивали про восстановление после отрыва грудной. Но реальность настолько банальна,что никто не верит. Я ничего не делал несколько месяцев,после того,как хирург сказал,что если я хочу еще жать относительно много,то лучше не шить. Потом начал разрабатывать амплитуду в разных движениях ,в том числе в самом жиме. Начинал с жима на полу и на доску,постепенно перешёл на лавку. Собственно,всё. …

❤294👍58🔥43⚡2😢1

22 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC≈10,800 views265 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Не прошло и месяца,а как-то случайно я пережал свой же рекорд зала 🗿 455lb или 207кг. На данном этапе мне видится самым реалистичным и оптимальным - сдвинуть свой жим ближе к результату до травмы. После травмы я один раз в зале жал 210 и на помосте 205.

🔥184❤48⚡17❤‍🔥9👍6💯1

20 Jul 2026, 21:36 UTC≈10,900 views545 reactions3 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Грустная новость. Многие тут,возможно,уже и не знают кто это,но в своё время именно благодаря этому человеку многие пришли сферу фитнеса и начали поднимать что-то тяжелое. Форум do4a был на заре становления всей такой спорт тусовки и открыл ворота для многих.Тот объем информации ,который он аккумулировал на тот момент в ру сегменте сложно с чем-то сравнить. Да,для кого-то он личность спорная и многое,что он популяриз…

❤302🕊161😭39🫡26💔11😢3🔥2🥰1

20 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC≈10,300 views190 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Метод Хепберна на практике. Самая известная схема Хепберна строится вокруг одного принципа: сначала увеличить объем работы, потом увеличить вес. Допустим, ваш текущий рабочий вес в жиме 140 кг. Первая тренировка: 8(подходов)×2 (повтора)× 140 кг Все подходы уверенные, без отказа. Следующая цель не добавить 2,5 кг, а сделать больше работы с тем же весом. Получается примерно так: 8×2 7×2 + 1×3 6×2 + 2×3 5×2 + 3×3 ……

❤‍🔥111❤41🤝15👍14⚡5🐳2🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC≈9,180 views193 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Метод Хепберна. Почему один из сильнейших людей своего времени тренировался совсем не так, как большинство. Продолжаем разбирать с вами интересные тренировочные подходы в рамках развития силы. Все мы любим тяжелые синглы,многие строят вокруг этого весь свой тренировочный план.Поднимать линейно рекорды каждую неделю - мечта. Но Дуг Хепберн первый человек, официально пожавший 500 фунтов (227 кг), использовал соверш…

❤99⚡56👍34🔥2❤‍🔥1😁1

17 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC≈9,840 views228 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Video

Я не назову обратную гиперэкстензию панацеей, но её место в программе силовика, будь то подготовка, восстановление, межсезонье или любой другой этап- сложно переоценить. Как говорят там, где жил Луи Симмонс, game changer. Даже без веса упражнение приносит большую пользу. Но если со временем грамотно прогрессировать нагрузку именно в этих углах, становиться сильнее,бонус для здоровья и силы всей задней цепи получаетс…

❤169👍34🔥20⚡2🐳2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @strongborsh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,415,446
#1
4ch
@why4ch · 1,042,455
#2
JUGGERNAUT 1.0
@juggernautnews · 18,030
#3
1.5 качка / мини пекка
@poltorapomidora · 251,487
#4
ExSport
@sportXpres · 120,480
#5
Nazarchq
@nazarchqq · 5,442
#6
вандерыч
@wanderrro · 10,329
#7
биохакер
@b1ohack · 8,010
#8
ШЕРСТНЕВ
@sherstnevILYA · 12,448
#9
Derzko69
@gigaderzko69 · 229,315
#10
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 359,059
#11
Культура позирования
@Antonysculptor · 4,147
#12
SapogGym
@sapoggym · 26,157
#13
Штанга FM
@shtangafm · 13,801
#14
Vladimir Gabrielyan
@gabrielyan_pro · 17,650
#15
Вестник Шевцова
@jolynews · 208,211
#16
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,445,701
#17
пауэрлифтинг головного мозга
@kchani47 · 797
#18
AllAboutLift ▫️ Анна Парджиани
@allaboutlift · 5,537
#19
Метаморфоза
@Max_anti_trainer · 185,818
#20
аннаЖ
@zhngym · 10,141
#21
Безгрешные души💉
@ugliprotein · 2,945
#22
Dmitry Spiridonov
@DmitrySpiridonovv · 8,668
#23
Эль Профессор
@vrto99 · 2,010
#24
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,205,572
#25
Гараж Качалка
@efim_fits · 31,722
#26
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,059,396
#27
Steel Grip
@steelgripru · 3,662
#28
ANDY KOJO: Дневник PRO
@andy_kojo31 · 6,174
#29
Evidence Based Cult
@evidencebasedcult · 8,176
#30
Nikita Polekhin | BB & Life
@nikitmutant · 9,276
#31
ДАНИЛА ГОРИЛЛА 🦍
@danila_gorilla · 643,829
#32
Ликс
@dmlixxx · 361,606
#33
НМШ
@nmshhub · 721,829
#34
Мамба
@Mamba_from_italy · 1,525
#35
ЛЫСЫЙ БОДЕР
@lisiy_boder · 6,742
#36
EVELONE 1️⃣9️⃣2️⃣
@evelone192gg · 1,103,372
#37
Биполярка Сарычева
@bipolyarkasarych · 107,608
#38
Limar freedom
@fr33domchannel · 14,594
#39
Медийка
@mediyca · 726,755
#40
Chaos extreme
@chaosextreme · 1,756
#41
bushido zho
@bushidozho · 188,314
#42
CheBa|Life
@jagajagabumbum · 4,285
#43
В гостях у Булыча
@bulkin_live · 909,378
#44
татушки на матрасе
@podsobka88 · 4,646
#45
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,089,162
#46
PLOHOY PAREN
@plohoypacan · 380,482
#47
Летописи Дракона
@dragonschool4 · 5,966
#48
Пауэрлифтинг / Powerlifting
@russia_powerlifting · 4,585
#49
ЛИТВИН
@litvintm · 1,569,936
#50
SHTOLL NEWS💋
@SHTOLLNEWS · 519,842
#51
POLEZNOO TEAM
@POLEZNOO_TEAM · 4,252
#52
ФРАМЕ ТАМЕР
@oieiei · 685,689
#53
STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 265,104
#54
папа леопард
@junkjustfunk · 156
#55
ПрАтеин
@prAtein_no · 23,700
#56
Тренер Артём
@trener_artem · 56,518
#57
Gust Forex 🇺🇦
@gustnews · 10,287
#58
Salvus channel
@salvus_channel · 8,724
#59
TRUE LIFTING
@truelifting · 1,149
#60

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ExSport
@sportXpres · 120,480
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
SapogGym
@sapoggym · 26,157
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 12 September 2026
Гараж Качалка
@efim_fits · 31,722
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 8 September 2026
Святилище Пастора
@smaevandreyy · 46,049
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 27 August 2026
🥇🇷🇺DARIA PLUZHNIKOVA🇷🇺🥇
@DariaShuer · 65,802
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 21 August 2026
Тренер Артём
@trener_artem · 56,518
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Александр Никулин Road to the Battletoad
@battletoadteam · 23,670
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 18 September 2026
Биполярка Сарычева
@bipolyarkasarych · 107,608
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
ПрАтеин
@prAtein_no · 23,700
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 September 2026
Artem Shirokov
@shirokovar · 20,057
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 September 2026
Метаморфоза
@Max_anti_trainer · 185,818
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
AKIMBO_69
@akimbo69max · 32,454
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
Виктор Блуд
@victorblud · 73,484
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
Скоромный
@Skoromnyy · 22,136
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сильный БОРЩ” (@strongborsh), 24,278 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strongborsh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.