Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -1,176. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 124,024–125,552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 02:17
124,200
-212
14 Aug 2026, 15:48
124,412
-170
13 Aug 2026, 07:04
124,582
-157
12 Aug 2026, 04:22
124,739
-79
11 Aug 2026, 03:46
124,818
-121
10 Aug 2026, 03:11
124,939
-107
9 Aug 2026, 05:52
125,046
-147
8 Aug 2026, 02:31
125,193
-111
7 Aug 2026, 00:33
125,304
-72
6 Aug 2026, 06:31
125,376
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.4%
avg views ÷ 124,200 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,200
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
49 (1 August 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
920,960
Reactions total
27,575
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,400
Videos
≈2,820
Links
≈2,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
18m 04s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25,649 reactions across 45 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10,208
39.8%
🔥
2,989
11.7%
💯
2,596
10.1%
🕊
2,465
9.61%
🤣
1,765
6.88%
🗿
1,459
5.69%
🫡
875
3.41%
😈
799
3.12%
❤🔥
687
2.68%
👎
654
2.55%
👍
304
1.19%
😢
227
0.885%
⚡
173
0.674%
🌚
110
0.429%
🤩
73
0.285%
😱
65
0.253%
🐳
60
0.234%
💔
39
0.152%
💊
26
0.101%
🤯
25
0.097%
5 further kinds
50
0.195%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,575reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 48 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sportXpres. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Подготовка на пиве и стероидах 🍺
Американец Питер Моссфилд решил подготовиться на соревнования по бодибилдингу по особой программе. 24 банки пива в сутки и стероиды, одно условие, никаких тренировок. Под конец «Подготовки» Питер перешёл на водку.
В категории Men's Physique Питер занял
8-е место. Правда в категории всего было 8 участников, но это всё мелочи.
❤️ - Вот она новая эра!
#бодибилдинг
ExSport. Подписаться
Роналду хитрый лис, зажмотил $700МЛН❗️
За сутки до свадьбы Роналду и Джорджина подписали брачный договор: в нём указано, что каждая сторона сохраняет активы, которыми владела до брака, и любые активы, приобретенные после него. Если они что‑то покупают вместе, этот актив может принадлежать обоим.
❤️ - Гений. Миллиардер. Плейбой. Филантроп.
#футбол
ExSport. Подписаться
Гарри удивил, а Махачев в свою очередь не подвел — Сегодня утром завершился UFC 330, в котором Ислам Махачев побил рекорд Силвы, одержав 17-ю победу подряд. Гарри очень приятно удивил: отличная оборона от борьбы, хороший темп с акцентом на контратаки.
Не смотря на то, что Ислам забрал большинство раундов, Гарри провел достойный и конкурентный бой. 🔥- Легенда на Исламе!
#ufc
ExSport. Подписаться
🇧🇷Габриэль Занканелли победитель Texas Pro 2026 в категории "Classic Physique".
Спасибо, Техас! Олимпия, я иду!
После Атланты Габриэль привёз не менее качественную форму в Техас, а то и лучше (судить вам).
❤️ - Ждём на Олимпии!
#новости
ExSport. Подписаться
Колтон начал охоту на рекорд Магнусона и всех классиков❗️
"В этом году я подниму в классике 455 кг с лямками, а на следующий год еще больше без лямок в троеборье! Классический рекорд Бенни Магнусона - 460 кг будет побит! И после этого думаю, все успокоятся"
Ответы коллег по цеху так же не заставили себя ждать. Тор в комментариях был не найден.
😈 - Ну что за мужик…Ждём!
#пауэрлифтинг
ExSport. Подписаться
Коротко о вчерашней ночи👆
А если серьезно, то мы поставили точку в этих «переговорах» и рассказали всю правду про East vs West. Как начиналось общение, почему мы в итоге отказали и почему гонорар в $500 это мало.
😂 - Азиатская Санта-Барбара закончена!
Или не закончили?
#новости
Посмотреть полное видео
ExSport. Подписаться
🫡Скрытный Самсон Дауда будто бы прочитал наш пост про Лансфорда и тоже выложил свою тренировку ног.
С нетерпением ждём 24 сентября, чтобы увидеть этого монстра на сцене.
Ох Серёга, сложно будет…
#бодибилдинг
ExSport. Подписаться
🕊️В возврате 33 лет скончался пуэрто-риканский боксёр Причард Колон —
В 2015 году Причард вышел на ринг с непобеждённым Террелом Уильямсом, где пропустил множество запрещенных ударов в области затылка. Колон решил отказаться от боя, но, к сожалению, сделал это в 9-м раунде, после двух нокдаунов.
После этой грязи (по-другому поединок не назвать) у Колона диагностировали кровоизлияние в мозг. Семь месяцев комы. После …
Две на самом деле важные новости за сегодня❗️
Пока Андрей Смаев ломает корни деревьев, Вадим Сапог ищет главный выбор в жизни человека. Узнать нашёл ли Вадим смысл вы можете в его ролике, а Андрей, спойлер - поломал
❤️- Две вселенные схлестнулись
#новости
ExSport. Подписаться
❌Акимбо НЕ поедет на East vs West в Китае! Но деньги обещал выплатить, как и сказал!
Команда Максима не смогла договориться с EvW об условиях его выступления. Так же в видео Акимбо бросил вызов Олегу Черкасову и попросил Кирилла Мартынова (Руки Титанов) помочь с организацией этого поединка. В видео Максим очень расплывчато рассказал об отмене поединка, но благо есть развернутый ответ.
Как думаете, вывезет Олега?
😂 -…
🦈 SHARK SHOP — генеральный спонсор ExSport
Рады представить нового партнёра нашего канала — SHARK SHOP.
Магазин спортивной фармакологии с большим ассортиментом оригинальной продукции и доставкой по всей России. Специально для подписчиков ExSport — скидка 10% на заказ по промокоду «XSPORT».
👉 [ССЫЛКА НА SHARK SHOP]👈
SHARK SHOP × ExSport
Прогресс неизбежен.
ExSport. Подписаться
👎571❤60🔥20❤🔥11👍5🌚3⚡1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @sportXpres. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 8,965 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sportXpres named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mrolympiallc named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Биполярка Сарычева @bipolyarkasarych · 108,912 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
Метаморфоза @Max_anti_trainer · 183,091 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
Derzko69 @gigaderzko69 · 231,025 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ExSport” (@sportXpres), 124,200 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sportXpres.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.