Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Artem Shirokov

@shirokovar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,387subscribers

+255 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001572242584
TypeChannel
Username@shirokovar
DescriptionПо деловым предложениям, а также за приобретением тренировочных программ по стритлифтингу писать @IvanPetrovich_admin
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shirokovar

Growth

19,13219,38719,259.56 August 2026 — 19,132 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,171 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,188 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,209 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,281 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,336 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,387 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +255. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,094–19,425 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:4319,387+51
11 Aug 2026, 13:4619,336+55
10 Aug 2026, 16:3619,281+72
9 Aug 2026, 14:1719,209+21
8 Aug 2026, 11:0319,188+17
7 Aug 2026, 07:2819,171+39
6 Aug 2026, 08:1819,132first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.1%
avg views ÷ 19,387 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,800
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held17 (15 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total20,390
Reactions total724
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
351
Videos
152
Links
87

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 21s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,890 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1,45537.4%
🔥1,02426.3%
custom 547008743786049084654013.9%
custom 52583683091993872333087.92%
2406.17%
custom 5467444181842546533972.49%
🤯812.08%
custom 5467597172872584200671.72%
551.41%
🕊120.308%
🫡110.283%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,890reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 17 we hold a reading for · 59%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shirokovar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC≈4,240 views109 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Добротно провели эфир. Собрался онлай почти из 500, что вроде бы вполне. Запись сохранил, так что заглядывайте. В конце провёл небольшой экскурс по суперфудам, совершив трапезу биоценного топлива.

custom 525836830919938723363🔥27custom 547008743786049084612custom 54674441818425465335❤‍🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈7,990 views284 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Тяжелый контент

149🔥82custom 547008743786049084644❤‍🔥9

4 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈8,160 views331 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Лайфхак для мужчин от моего прадеда

🔥237custom 52583683091993872333925🤯11custom 54700874378604908467❤‍🔥5🫡4🕊2

11 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC≈16,000 views362 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Подкрадывался, чтобы поесть, но сделал вид, что просто сидит рядом

❤‍🔥265custom 546759717287258420056custom 525836830919938723321custom 547008743786049084615custom 54674441818425465334🫡1

8 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC≈15,500 views164 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Блюдо от шефа с мёдом

🔥105custom 52583683091993872333011custom 54674441818425465336❤‍🔥4🫡4custom 54700874378604908464

6 Jul 2026, 20:40 UTC≈13,700 views252 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Стандартная служба в Храме Силы

🔥170❤‍🔥37custom 547008743786049084626custom 5467444181842546533106🕊3

5 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC≈11,900 views284 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Однорукие подъемы в вис, на десерт, после основных блюд

❤‍🔥182custom 547008743786049084654🤯24🔥174🫡2custom 52583683091993872331

2 Jul 2026, 20:26 UTC≈11,000 views405 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Валя пустил корни, вдохнув природного вайба; Тарас показывает на практике, что настоящему философу борьба не чужда. Никита, в свою очередь, занимается зеленой живописью на белой футболке Тараса; Я, как понимаете, интересуюсь, но шашлык в приоритете.

❤‍🔥300custom 547008743786049084660custom 525836830919938723328custom 5467444181842546533833custom 54675971728725842003

2 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC≈9,930 views203 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Примерно 5 тренировок OAP дали приятный бонус в виде личного рекорда +15kg с фиксацией. Вчерашнее синглы: Dips 150kg x1 Pull ups 95kg x1 fix OAP 15kg x1 fix

❤‍🔥123🔥41custom 5470087437860490846314🤯2custom 54674441818425465331custom 54675971728725842001

27 Jun 2026, 08:55 UTC≈11,600 views216 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Факультативом

🔥145❤‍🔥28custom 547008743786049084617🤯96custom 54674441818425465336custom 52583683091993872333custom 54675971728725842002

25 Jun 2026, 10:50 UTC≈10,800 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @singularityshoppPhoto

Мёд и Пыльца сезона 2026! Через 2 недели будет доступен к отправке долгожданный урожай мёда и пыльцы сезона 2026. Высочайшее качество с эко-пасеки, расположенной на диких полях ростовской области. Всего будет в доступе: 15кг мёда акации и 30кг майского мёда. Цена 1,5кг — 3500₽ 2кг пыльца. Цена 200г — 2100₽ Основной взяток пыльцы: ива, мать-и-мачеха, дуб, подорожник, василёк, малина, вишня, земляника, синявка 🌸

🔥45❤‍🔥10custom 54700874378604908466custom 54674441818425465334custom 52583683091993872332🕊1

25 Jun 2026, 09:21 UTC≈9,470 views178 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Объемный блок продолжается. Сегодня 90 на 5

custom 5470087437860490846105🤯32🔥23custom 5467444181842546533113❤‍🔥3custom 54675971728725842001

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @shirokovar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 544,091 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BIOMACHINE
@bmchn · 174,941
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Artem Shirokov” (@shirokovar), 19,387 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shirokovar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.