Мои услуги можно изучить тут🔽
https://t.me/artemmkey/346
Мой контакт для связи @artemkey_new
Включена РКН в перечень персональных страниц
https://clck.ru/3GLAuR
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net +217. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,065–31,556 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 00:18
31,339
-51
17 Sept 2026, 15:00
31,390
+14
15 Sept 2026, 10:17
31,376
-11
13 Sept 2026, 21:40
31,387
-5
12 Sept 2026, 05:21
31,392
-33
10 Sept 2026, 02:39
31,425
-26
6 Sept 2026, 18:17
31,451
-48
4 Sept 2026, 09:20
31,499
+26
2 Sept 2026, 19:53
31,473
+8
1 Sept 2026, 19:06
31,465
-14
31 Aug 2026, 16:17
31,479
+13
30 Aug 2026, 19:37
31,466
+51
29 Aug 2026, 19:03
31,415
+117
28 Aug 2026, 22:28
31,298
+100
27 Aug 2026, 19:07
31,198
+17
26 Aug 2026, 22:07
31,181
-1
25 Aug 2026, 21:35
31,182
-22
24 Aug 2026, 18:18
31,204
-42
23 Aug 2026, 04:59
31,246
-16
21 Aug 2026, 19:05
31,262
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.2%
avg views ÷ 31,339 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,030
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.706%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
24 (8 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
42,220
Reactions total
298
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 22:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
358
Videos
213
Links
155
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 47s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,090 reactions across 24 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
749
68.7%
👍
151
13.9%
🔥
109
10.0%
👏
17
1.56%
😨
13
1.19%
👌
12
1.10%
🤨
8
0.734%
🤡
5
0.459%
🥰
5
0.459%
💯
4
0.367%
🤣
4
0.367%
⚡
2
0.183%
❤🔥
2
0.183%
😁
2
0.183%
🤝
2
0.183%
🤯
2
0.183%
🆒
1
0.092%
🏆
1
0.092%
😭
1
0.092%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,090 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 24 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artemmkey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Компания ON уничтожает Nike
Килиан Мбаппе после 20 лет с NIKE присоединится к футбольной легенде Тьерри Анри, который стал новым директором ON по футбольному направлению.
Они хотят применять технологию распыления материала на формы для создания футбольных бутс с невероятно гибким и лёгким верхом.
В рамках нового этапа выхода на футбольный рынок ON запустит свои первые футбольные бутсы в 2027 году
27-летний футбол…
В Америке эта компания прогремела и все хотят повторить ее успех
недавно паренек этот продал бизнес за 1.2 млрд $ а компании всего лишь 3 года
Смотрите сегодня на мультивитамины и особенно порошковую зелень тренд в америке. Этот тренд создала компания AG1 (имеет выручку 600 млн $) и создавала она этот рынок около 15 лет.
Но была одна проблема большая - это неудобно разводить постоянно порошок - точнее кому то удоб…
Футбольный клуб был на грани банкротства. А потом сделал форму, которую захотел весь мир
Венецианский футбольный клуб Venezia ещё недавно был клубом, который мало кто за пределами Италии вообще знал.
У клуба были серьёзные финансовые проблемы, он пережил несколько банкротств и долгое время болтался между низшими дивизионами.
Но потом у них появляется этот человек Соня Кондратенко - они Media Director
Они перестали пр…
Блогер из аргентины скопировала бренд Rhode
Аргентинская блогерша запустила бренд напитков - с электролитами и коллагеном под названием Sorbo и упаковка, шрифты, цветовая палитра и даже позы моделей в рекламных фото почти один в один повторяют бренд Rhode
Давайте так - я всегда за то - чтобы не изобретать велосипед, а вдохновляться у лучших, но делать надо это умнее. брать 4 референcа лучших и обьединять. наприме…
Сейчас набирает популярность вот этот формат
Ai сериалы.
За последнюю неделю очень много видел таких роликов и в целом аккаунт у них вырос сильно. Совакупно млн 70+ охвата они набрали точно. Вот тут глянуть можно (*meta террористическая организация в рф)
Знаете, отелям, ресторанам я думаю этот формат классно подошел бы. Чтобы вокруг локации выстраивать что то похожее
Ну или ai сервисам разным (но думаю они уже это …
Самое частое что слышу от брендов за последние 2 месяца
«платные блогеры вообще не работают, мы делает только бартер
И развиваем свои бренд медиа»
Давайте я добавлю от себя мыслей:
1) алгоритм инсты (*признана террористической организацией в рф) таааак сильно качнулся, что как будто и все равно на теплую аудиторию блогера, цель только захватить внимание узкой ЦА и попасть им в рекомендации
2) нет задачи набирать м…
Очень полезную таблицу опубликовал в своем 2-м канале «куда дует ветер»
В этой таблице собраны все компании из продовольственной сферы, в которые про инвестировали в этом году
Смотреть тут
Мне нравится фраза моего друга Кости Феданова, эта фраза помогает очень
«компания это как асвальтоукоадчики, кто то там делает тренды, суетится, дергается, уходит с рынка, а мы просто медленно, но верно укладываем асвальт и делаем результат»
Это фраза мне в моем блоге помогла за последние месяца, я вообще перестал переживать о конкурентах. Их появляется десятки каждый месяц, но они появляются и потом их мотивация п…
Каждый раз задумываюсь, как же маркетинг перепрошивает нас😅
Я раньше считал кроссовки On некрасивыми, но их вот этот маркетинг «эти кроссовки носят миллиардеры» сразу перепрошил меня и я стал проооосто фанатом их. Уверен у многих также
Или было какое то время такая же тема у whoop - что их амбасадорами были не спортсмены, а именно бизнесмены успешные и это продало меня whoop. (Правда потом надоело носить)
Или обра…
Вау, это супер маркетинг
Мне чем то напоминает чехол от Rhode
Проблема такая правда существует, иногда дома хочется позаниматься а гантелей нет
Мне кажется для PR это шикарно они придумали . Они это сделали для мероприятий Hyrox
*meta признана экстремистской организацией на территории рф
Каждый день с командой публикуем для вас тут @kuda_duet_veter_business по 2 поста с интересными компаниями в кого инвестируют! Сам читаю каждый день и повышаю насмотрнность
Create Wellness становится лидером на Target и Amazon
О КОМПАНИИ:
Create производит жевательные конфеты с креатином (креатиновые гамми) и другие продукты для повышения силы, выносливости и когнитивных функций.
Основной продукт - креатиновые гамми с 1.5 г чистого креатина Creapure® в каждой конфете.
Продукты сертифицированы NSF for Sport, проходят стороннее тестирование, не содержат ГМО и подходят для веганов
ИНВЕСТО…
👍16❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @artemmkey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бойкий Шухрат @BoykiyM · 21,538 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
кабинет маркетолога @youtube_marina · 49,816 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
ChatPlace @chatplaceio · 53,385 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Арон Закрия @aironzak · 121,359 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Продюсер Курчанов @kurchanov_prod · 29,177 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 September 2026
Павел Гительман @potok_gitelman · 38,562 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
Илья Палий @mirneyrosetey · 34,182 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
Кирилл Потапов l REELS ACADEMY @ReelsAcademyPotapovfx · 93,834 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Руслан Гамзатов | AI маркетинг @AIGamzatov · 30,202 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Нейроконцентрат | нейросети, технологии @AIConcentrate · 30,933 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
Беляк про нейросети @belyakAi · 30,746 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Артем Кей” (@artemmkey), 31,339 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artemmkey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.