🤫 Про эти источники трафика не знают ваши конкуренты. А вы будете знать 14 августа в 15:00 (мск) наши коллеги из «Ресурс Развития» проведут эфир вместе с Ларой Усовой — ген директором партнёрской сети «Лидмагнит». И расскажут про альтернативные источники трафика для инфобизнеса в 2026 году. Пока все толпятся на одном рекламном аукционе и смотрят, как растёт цена лида, есть модель, где вы платите фиксированную цену…

Channel
Хайлайты | Журнал про инфобиз и edtech
@infohilights
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,476subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001606483714 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @infohilights |
| Description | Разбираем воронки и запуски. Рекламные креативы и маркетинговые фишки для онлайн-школ. Интервью с экспертами. Хочешь в следующий выпуск журнала: @Kaa1019 По всем вопросам рекламы пиши: @hiinfobiz № 5940489521 #OXCLD |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/infohilights |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 21,476 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 21,473 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 21,474 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 21,473 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 21,477 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 21,490 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 21,498 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 21,498 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.44%
- avg views ÷ 21,476 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 953
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.39%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (10 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,973 |
| Reactions total | 259 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,370
- Videos
- ≈556
- Links
- ≈1,210
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
295 reactions across 21 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 16.9% | |
| 👍 | 49 | 16.6% | |
| 😭 | 40 | 13.6% | |
| 😁 | 37 | 12.5% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 12.2% | |
| 🍌 | 19 | 6.44% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 4.07% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 2.37% | |
| 🦄 | 7 | 2.37% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 1.69% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 1.69% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.36% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 1.36% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.36% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.02% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.678% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 0.678% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 0.678% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 0.678% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.339% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 1.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 25 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @infohilights. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
ЖКХ модерация ВК ты шо творишь?! Так-то мы уже месяца 3 наблюдаем разного рода пикантные посты и в ленте и на продвижении. И честно говоря, все еще не можем привыкнуть. Кто в курсе, что там происходит? Модерацию распустили? 😁
😱8🌭2😁2
🍳 ИИшниииица | Аналитика по рынку онлайн-обучения ИИ и нейросетям Наши коллеги из GetCourse снова все за нас посчитали. Раз в год GetCourse фиксирует аналитику на рынке онлайн-обучения ИИ и нейросетям. В материале изучили: 1. Какие направления обучения у таких школ наиболее популярны 2. Сколько людей проходят курсы по работе с ИИ 3. Какой оборот вообще у этих школ 4. Почему из года в год снижается средний чек на…
❗️ Уиу-уиу-уиу | Разыскиваем 2х экспертов Со всеми, кто оставил заявку на участие в Резиденции, мы свяжемся. Но если вы по этим темам на последние 2 места 👇 • Инфобиз: запуски, трафик, рост эксперта, подписчики • Женская тематика: энергия, интуиция, косметология, цели и изменение жизни То напишите срочно в личку @tatta_fadeeva 🐱 Всем Мур.
💅 Вы пропустили новый проект Хайлайтов… ну почти Так вышло, что мы запустили новый спец проект, в который уже зашли люди. А мы даже не рассказали о нем ни в одном из наших каналов. Стыдно. 👑 Мы открываем медиа-отель «Резиденция.Хайлайтов» Раз в сезон наша редакция собирает совместимую пятерку экспертов, продюсирует и упаковывает для них обмен аудиториями, эфиры и спец активности для их ЦА. ——— Что получают участ…
❤5
🤫 Тссс…
🤣5
🎥Как за 3 минуты посчитать, окупитесь ли вы: формула + реальные цены регистрации по нишам Если вы пропустили прямой эфир от наших коллег из Ресурс Развития про YouTube как холодный источник для онлайн-школ, то нам дали запись. Что внутри: • Почему YouTube окупается лучше — механика, которой нет у других каналов • Как за 3 минуты посчитать, окупитесь ли вы: формула + реальные цены регистрации по нишам • Матрица в…
👍2
👀 Вау! Более 40% учеников онлайн-курсов имеют высшее образование Наши коллеги из GetCourse снова все за нас посчитали. В новом исследовании они изучили корреляцию между людьми с высшим образованием и студентами онлайн-курсов. Посмотрели, какие должности занимают респонденты и какими направлениями интересуются. Есть и интересные наблюдения про то, какие курсы интересны людям с высшим и неоконченным высшим образован…
❤5🔥1
🤫 Дурова внесли в перечень террористов и экстремистов Новость от Фонтанки и всех главных СМИ 58 секунд назад.
🤯7😢4😱4
🎙 Все идут работать с СНГ из-за дешёвого трафика. Но получают аудиторию, которая хуже платит Наши коллеги из Ресурс Развития опубликовали подкаст с Алексеем Вельчевым, основателем агентства MNIME Digital. Что внутри: • Почему ставка на один-два источника трафика — это зона риска, и сколько каналов нужно для устойчивой системы • Кого на самом деле искать в СНГ, если не «всё гео подряд» — и при чём тут русскоязычны…
❤🔥4👍3🥰1
⚡️ Госдума допускает, что Телеграм может стать экстремистским «Шанс, что Telegram будет признан экстремистским, крайне высоки» — председатель совета Фонда развития цифровой экономики Герман Клименко. Ваши ставки, господа 👇
😭24😐2👎1👏1
Ну что, разблокировка Телеграма, видимо, отменяется? 🥲
😭16❤1👾1😎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @infohilights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 80,073 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@dikayaconfa · 6813 postsTG-БОССЫ (ПОДАРКИ)
@tgbossy · 3282 postsАНОНСЫ ДЛЯ СПИКЕРОВ И НЕТВОРКЕРОВ
@anonsypestova · 651 postТест
@antontumtest · 111 postМаринов Алексей. Про деньги, партнерки, онлайн-школы.
@GetLimon · 1,8421 postЧестный маркетолог | Кирилл Костарев
@honeyst_marketer · 3111 postКузьмицкая наблюдает
@kuz_marketing · 1031 postПох*й, пишем! | Мария Черкасова
@maryprotext · 1601 postАлександра Хлызова
@metodolog_infobusiness · 6081 post💥 МИССИЯ - ТРАФИК. ️️Тренды Инфобиза
@mission_traffic · 1641 postПродажи в переписке
@prodazhy_v_perepiske · 2,2411 postТГ-ЗВЕЗДЫ | ПОДАРКИ
@tgstarsbonus · 1511 postЗнания в деньги
@znanievdengi · 2371 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AyazShabutdinov · 181,116
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хайлайты | Журнал про инфобиз и edtech” (@infohilights), 21,476 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infohilights.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.