Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бундесканцлер

Channel

Бундесканцлер

@bundeskanzlerRU

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,908subscribers

+150 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001375736773
TypeChannel
Username@bundeskanzlerRU
Created18 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bundeskanzlerRU

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,7585,9125,8356 August 2026 — 5,758 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,758 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,770 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,773 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,763 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,770 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,784 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,785 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,781 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,785 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,801 subscribers10 September 2026 — 5,885 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,889 subscribers28 September 2026 — 5,897 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,898 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,910 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,905 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,902 subscribers21 October 2026 — 5,903 subscribers25 October 2026 — 5,904 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,908 subscribers30 October 2026 — 5,912 subscribers2 November 2026 — 5,908 subscribers6 November 2026 — 5,906 subscribers9 November 2026 — 5,908 subscribers5,9086 August 20269 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net +150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,735–5,935 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 03:065,908+2
6 Nov 2026, 02:215,906-2
2 Nov 2026, 16:165,908-4
30 Oct 2026, 23:485,912+4
28 Oct 2026, 07:595,908+4
25 Oct 2026, 02:285,904+1
21 Oct 2026, 21:015,903+1
18 Oct 2026, 16:275,902-3
15 Oct 2026, 12:555,905-5
12 Oct 2026, 12:415,910+12
5 Oct 2026, 15:595,898+1
28 Sept 2026, 05:195,897+8
14 Sept 2026, 04:005,889+4
10 Sept 2026, 01:585,885+84
4 Sept 2026, 20:425,801+16
1 Sept 2026, 15:555,785+4
29 Aug 2026, 12:375,781-4
26 Aug 2026, 06:095,785+1
19 Aug 2026, 18:235,784+14
16 Aug 2026, 07:585,770first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.0%
avg views ÷ 5,908 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,770
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held45 (17 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total55,484
Reactions total1,306
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 01:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,844 reactions across 42 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬60621.3%
❤53218.7%
🔥36812.9%
😁32311.4%
👍30910.9%
🤡2047.17%
😢1736.08%
🤯1394.89%
🥴792.78%
🫡240.844%
🤔230.809%
👏220.774%
💯200.703%
✍110.387%
🗿110.387%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,013 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 45 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bundeskanzlerRU. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (55.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 20:53 UTC874 views52 reactionsread 5 November 2026

В возрасте 55 лет скончался министр экономики Баварии и лидер партии «Свободные избиратели» Хуберт Айвангер. @BundeskanzlerRU

😢43🫡8🔥1

2 Nov 2026, 11:53 UTC≈1,580 views41 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @berlinertelegraphofiziell

Водородные мусоровозы под вопросом: Гейдельберг столкнулся с дорогостоящими техническими проблемами Гейдельберг отказывается от водородного мусоровоза после нескольких лет эксплуатации, сопровождавшихся постоянными техническими проблемами. Город намерен установить существующий кузов и оборудование машины на новое шасси с дизельным двигателем. На переоборудование предусмотрено 240 тысяч евро. Водородное шасси планиру…

😁24🥴10❤3🤡3🔥1

31 Oct 2026, 21:51 UTC≈2,250 views79 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🎃 fröhliches Halloween! @BundeskanzlerRU

😁48❤21🔥6🤡2🗿1🤬1

31 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC≈2,270 views52 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🇵🇱 «Два суда, забор, болгарка»: что происходит в Польше? В пятницу председатель Конституционного трибунала Богдан Свенчковский (назначен при PiS) пытался попасть на рабочее место, однако дальше забора (которые пришлось пилить болгаркой) он не продвинулся, территорию оцепила полиция. Накануне появилось сообщение, что Свенчковский и его заместитель Бартломей Соханьский отстранены на месяц, а судом пока будет руководит…

❤28😁11👍7🔥5🤯1

29 Oct 2026, 16:43 UTC≈2,250 views67 reactionsread 5 November 2026

«Клятва на верность брандмауэру»: CDU пыталась присягой выявить перебежчиков к AfD Избрание кандидата AfD председателем нового Ландтага Саксонии-Анхальт не только наделало шума из-за «лишних голосов», но и глубоко раскололо местную фракцию христианских-демократов. Выяснилось, что после инцидента на заседании фракции CDU в Магдебурге депутатам предложили подписать документ под громким названием «заявление под присяго…

😁42🔥14🤡6🥴4❤1

27 Oct 2026, 13:21 UTC≈2,570 views36 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Свежие демоскопические замеры демонстрируют некоторую заморозку расклада партийных сил: AfD по-прежнему лидирует рядом с заветной отметкой в 30%, CDU/CSU — на втором месте с 19-20%, а SPD и «Зеленые» борются за третье место. @BundeskanzlerRU

👍28🔥4🤔3🤡1

27 Oct 2026, 13:18 UTC≈2,300 views50 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @nonpartisan1Photo

Левые политические комментаторы часто объясняют протесты во Франции государственной экономией. Мол злые "неолибералы" перестали тратить деньги на бедных граждан. Давайте посмотрим на цифры. Я попросил ChatGPT сравнить социальные расходы Франции, Великобритании и брежневского СССР. Для СССР взяты данные за 1976 год, для Франции — за 2024-й, а для Великобритании — за 2025/26 финансовый год. Как видно на графиках, Фран…

👍34🤡11🥴3❤1🔥1

26 Oct 2026, 15:49 UTC≈2,990 views118 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Будущее левое правительство Берлина хочет дать право голоса почти миллиону иностранцев: но зачем? Одной из общих реформ, о которых в предварительном документе успели договориться Die Linke, SPD и «Зелёные» в Берлине — это активное избирательное право для иностранцев. По задумке в будущем лица, не имеющие немецкого гражданства, также смогут участвовать в выборах в Палату депутатов (местный Ландтаг) и районные собрани…

🤡59🤬40🤯11❤5👍2👏1

26 Oct 2026, 12:40 UTC≈2,610 views64 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Audi — за Трампа? Немецкие концерны продолжают попадать в эпицентр медийных и политических скандалов. После того, как BMW не продлила контракт с Ландтагом Саксонии-Анхальта из-за победы AfD, генеральный директор Audi Гернот Дёлльнер выступил на предвыборном митинге Трампа и объявил о строительстве завода. Часть немецких политиков и журналистов, конечно, увидела в этом союз «фашистов и капитала», но эта реакция неожи…

❤39😁13🤯6💯3🔥2🤬1

22 Oct 2026, 11:54 UTC≈3,190 views47 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @ostwest_tv

AfD подтвердила хакерскую атаку – в сеть выложили около 421 тысячи писем «Альтернатива для Германии» подтвердила, что в сентябре хакеры атаковали компанию, которая предоставляла партии услуги хостинга. По данным партии, злоумышленники скопировали данные из нескольких почтовых ящиков, большинство из которых уже много лет почти не использовались. Позже неизвестные опубликовали в интернете массив данных, который, по и…

🤬26🤔9👍5🔥4❤3

22 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC≈2,800 views36 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @egor_belyachkov_ueberOesterreichPhoto

Новые данные опросов общественного мнения в Австрии показывают растущее недовольство правящей коалицией В новом опросе, подготовленном IFDD для издания Kronen Zeitung, трехпартийная коалиция Австрийской народной партии, Социал-демократической партии и партии "Новая Австрия и Либеральный форум" в сумме получила меньше поддержки, чем правоконсервативная Австрийская партия свободы. АНП+СДПА+НАЛФ = 39% АПС – 40% Отдел…

❤27🔥8😢1

21 Oct 2026, 15:56 UTC≈3,250 views64 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Раз уж зашла речь о фискальной политике, то промежуточным итогом черно-красной коалиции Фридриха Мерца — несмотря на предвыборную и программную риторику о развороте и рекордных послаблениях — стало: 1) историческое повышение акциза на табак c 2027; 2) новый сбор на сахар в напитках c 2027; 3) повышение ставки алкогольного сбора (обсуждается); 4) снижение порога для «налога на богатых» (45%) c 2027; 5) новая максимал…

🤯37😁13🤬11❤1👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @bundeskanzlerRU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Стальной шлем
@stahlhelm · 20,645
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
У нас в Гамбурге
@beiunsinhamburg · 19,267
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бундесканцлер” (@bundeskanzlerRU), 5,908 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bundeskanzlerRU.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.