Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Локо ⚒️ Подкаст

Channel

Локо ⚒️ Подкаст

@lokomotivpodcast

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,842subscribers

+445 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001249915091
TypeChannel
Username@lokomotivpodcast
Created27 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lokomotivpodcast

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,3975,8425,619.56 August 2026 — 5,397 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,405 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,414 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,444 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,454 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,466 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,503 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,560 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,571 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,577 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,600 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,644 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,658 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,651 subscribers26 September 2026 — 5,741 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,749 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,729 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,736 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,730 subscribers21 October 2026 — 5,722 subscribers25 October 2026 — 5,739 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,743 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,756 subscribers3 November 2026 — 5,758 subscribers6 November 2026 — 5,768 subscribers9 November 2026 — 5,842 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net +445. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,330–5,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 21:455,842+74
6 Nov 2026, 14:465,768+10
3 Nov 2026, 16:155,758+2
31 Oct 2026, 07:105,756+13
28 Oct 2026, 08:355,743+4
25 Oct 2026, 06:465,739+17
21 Oct 2026, 23:295,722-8
18 Oct 2026, 08:565,730-6
15 Oct 2026, 01:305,736+7
12 Oct 2026, 03:185,729-20
5 Oct 2026, 02:205,749+8
26 Sept 2026, 11:585,741+90
17 Sept 2026, 07:175,651-7
13 Sept 2026, 15:365,658+14
9 Sept 2026, 11:375,644+44
4 Sept 2026, 02:155,600+23
31 Aug 2026, 22:365,577+6
29 Aug 2026, 00:455,571+11
25 Aug 2026, 20:135,560+57
23 Aug 2026, 03:115,503first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.8%
avg views ÷ 5,842 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,910
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held66 (4 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total46,590
Reactions total2,954
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 56s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,215 reactions across 56 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,94627.0%
😁1,60922.3%
🔥1,35718.8%
👍3905.41%
🤡3655.06%
💯2593.59%
🤣1562.16%
❤‍🔥1101.52%
💩941.30%
🏆921.28%
😱901.25%
👏891.23%
🎉731.01%
👎660.915%
😢630.873%
🫡570.79%
👻440.61%
🤮410.568%
🌚360.499%
🗿350.485%
25 further kinds2433.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,056 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 66 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lokomotivpodcast. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 66 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.03%
2 of 66 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,510
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,850
over 64 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJqUzRLzcNWqqZkqKs55m8nKDrVstvwBUsFkC6E24 August 20268 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 16:28 UTC≈1,540 views125 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Вот это нормальный матч со «Спартаком» 😙 «Локо» 🐺 забирает выездной матч 1:4 (да и атмосферу в целом тоже)

❤83🔥25💯14🏆3

4 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC≈2,110 views124 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Хей! Хей! 🚄

🔥86❤22👍9👏4🤝3

4 Nov 2026, 11:19 UTC≈2,560 views137 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁120🙈8🦄5👍4

4 Nov 2026, 11:11 UTC≈2,480 views17 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Удивительно, конечно, что с журналистами у стадиона в клубе разбирается СБ. А с тренером целый СД разобраться не может

❤15💊1🥴1

4 Nov 2026, 10:50 UTC≈2,520 views42 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Если вы вчера ушли спать после перфоманса Батракова, то с утра могли не понять, что за люди со смешанными эмоциями встречают вас на улице. Это либо участники вчерашнего СД «Локомотива», либо болельщики «МЮ» и «Ромы». Переживающие за англичан, кажется, уже просто не знают, как жить без эмоциональных качелей. Любимая команда проигрывает 0:2, потом капитан не забивает пенальти. Перебивает его уже успешно, а дальше игро…

❤20💩10👍5😁3💊2🔥1🤮1

4 Nov 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,570 views55 reactionsread 4 November 2026

2026 год получается весьма «бронзовым». Команда U-17 досрочно себе гарантировала третье место. Говорят, если бы не слабый старт, наверняка боролись и за более высокие позиции. По ходу сезона тренера Евсикова сменил тренер Ефимов (выдал серию из 10 матчей без поражений и поднял команду с 13 места на 3). И да, это Денис Евсиков и Сергей Ефимов. Узнали и согласны? Тогда проверьте давление, дорогие запищеки. Это вы еще …

❤43👍8🔥4

4 Nov 2026, 07:06 UTC≈2,480 views66 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @unitedsouthPhoto

⏰Ставь будильник, идём на дерби! В субботу 7 ноября в 11:45 наши девушки сыграют против «Спартака» в Суперлиге. Да, субботнее утро. Да, ноябрьская погода. Но на поле – «Локомотив», напротив – принципиальный соперник, а на трибуне нужны мы. Все, кто был на финале Кубка России, помнят искренние эмоции «железнодорожниц» от нашей поддержки, которые сражались до финального свистка, хотя счёт был очень неприятным. И непо…

❤42🏆17👍3🤡2🤣1😁1

3 Nov 2026, 20:04 UTC≈2,830 views238 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Всем спокойной ночи, отдыхайте! Ведь завтра снова вас ждут новости о любимом «Локомотиве»! Или не ждут…

😁183👻33😴11❤5🔥3🥱3

3 Nov 2026, 19:52 UTC≈2,900 views232 reactionsread 4 November 2026

В УЕФА испугались, что мы еще мемесов придумаем! И всё-таки признали его лучшим! https://t.me/iraploho/1674

❤164👏48😁16🔥4

3 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC≈3,270 views228 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Паника в офисе УЕФА прямо сейчас: как сделать так, чтобы награду лучшего игрок матча получил не этот русский 🇷🇺 Батраков?!?

😁160❤32🤣27💯6🤪2🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 19:19 UTC≈3,230 views249 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Лучше вы сегодня уже не увидите

😁183🔥33🤣26❤4🏆3

3 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC≈2,970 views456 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Ладно, просто в 73918479 раз погордимся, что это наш пацан!

❤340🔥74🎉37❤‍🔥4⚡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @lokomotivpodcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTCAnonymous Poll2,020 voters approx.

Соцопрос понедельника! К кому у вас накопилось больше вопросов и претензий прямо сейчас

  1. Юрий Нагорных19%
  2. Борис Ротенберг59%
  3. Михаил Галактионов22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ФК «Локомотив» Москва
@fclokomotiv · 80,651
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
Nobel
@nobel_arustamyan · 39,113
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 30 August 2026
ЭкСпорт Клипина
@xsport24 · 38,161
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
Брейдо / И после
@BreydoChannel · 21,355
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 September 2026
Open the Doors | Дорский
@openthedoors · 25,516
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 14 September 2026
Эль спортико
@trtrrtryy · 36,738
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
Инсайды от Карпа || Иван Карпов
@karpinside · 142,511
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 13 August 2026
Комментач
@Comment_ach · 22,815
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Нельзя смеяться
@nesocial · 22,225
Telegram ranks this channel #97 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Локо ⚒️ Подкаст” (@lokomotivpodcast), 5,842 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lokomotivpodcast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.