Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СБГ Аналитика (Зенит, сборная, тактика)

Channel

СБГ Аналитика (Зенит, сборная, тактика)

@sbganalitica

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,528subscribers

-183 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001139036490
TypeChannel
Username@sbganalitica
Created9 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sbganalitica

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,52814,76114,644.56 August 2026 — 14,711 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,711 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,722 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,706 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,718 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,720 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,715 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,714 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,713 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,704 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,710 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,736 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,752 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,742 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,745 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,761 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,729 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,722 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,718 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,704 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,699 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,688 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,678 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,684 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,635 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,632 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,644 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,605 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,584 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,555 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,554 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,545 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,554 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,528 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -183. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,493–14,796 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:5914,528-26
17 Sept 2026, 01:4114,554+9
15 Sept 2026, 03:2114,545-9
13 Sept 2026, 13:3614,554-1
11 Sept 2026, 17:3714,555-29
9 Sept 2026, 05:5714,584-21
6 Sept 2026, 01:4214,605-39
3 Sept 2026, 19:3614,644+12
2 Sept 2026, 14:2814,632-3
1 Sept 2026, 17:0214,635-49
31 Aug 2026, 15:5514,684+6
30 Aug 2026, 17:0714,678-10
29 Aug 2026, 19:3514,688-11
28 Aug 2026, 20:5514,699-5
27 Aug 2026, 19:4814,704-14
26 Aug 2026, 16:5914,718-4
25 Aug 2026, 16:3414,722-7
24 Aug 2026, 14:3414,729-32
22 Aug 2026, 23:4714,761+16
21 Aug 2026, 13:5414,745first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.1%
avg views ÷ 14,528 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,950
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held39 (24 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total39,630
Reactions total1,364
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,782 reactions across 39 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,50939.9%
82421.8%
👎41911.1%
🔥2326.13%
💯2085.50%
🤮2045.39%
🤔1925.08%
🤬471.24%
👀451.19%
💩180.476%
❤‍🔥130.344%
🤡130.344%
🏆90.238%
🗿60.159%
🤷‍♂60.159%
😱40.106%
👏30.079%
👨‍💻30.079%
😁30.079%
😢30.079%
15 further kinds210.555%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,782 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 39 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sbganalitica. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:38 UTC≈2,220 views40 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Стартовый состав на игру с «Динамо» из Махачкалы в 18:30 Типичная для Кубка ротация на месте. Вероятно, Караваев сыграет слева, а Дуглас поднимется в центр. 🤔️ СБГ Аналитика

👍28👀9🔥3

1 Sept 2026, 12:28 UTC≈3,940 views115 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Ирония ситуации Мостового в том, что именно сейчас он мог бы быть особенно полезен для «Зенита» И речь не столько про лимит, сколько про стилистические нюансы. Не просто так Семак в интервью Петровскому отдельно отмечал, что Андрею привычнее футбол на пространстве, контратакующая игра. И «Зенит» подстраивается под атакующую группу, которую имеет. Ведь если вынести за скобки навал с «Родиной» (тут Мостовой действите

👍7912👎9🤷‍♂6🤔4💯3🔥1😁1

30 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC≈5,420 views106 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Игра с «Факелом» — отличная иллюстрация стиля игры Луиса Энрике и причин, почему сейчас этот стиль никак не складывается с идеями штаба Вчера на 17 минуте бразилец запорол опасную контратаку тем, что стал тормозить и убирать мяч под себя. По сути, дал себя догнать двум защитникам (скрин) В отрыве от контекста отказ продолжать бежать вперед с мячом выглядит, как минимум, странно. Хотя подобные решения во время быстр

57👍41👎4❤‍🔥3👀1

29 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC≈4,860 views701 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Как вы оцениваете качество игры «Зенита» на старте сезона? 🤔️ СБГ Аналитика

👎402🤮204🤬47🤔25🗿6👍5🤡52

29 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC≈5,100 views91 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Карпукас оставляет положительное впечатление. Требует от партнеров движения, подсказывает, куда и кому сместиться, сам без мандража и явных проблем с сыгранностью, хотя приехал совсем недавно. Несколько раз хорошо включал партнеров передачами. В обороне у него тоже порядок. Еще из светлых пятен — острота после стандартов. Удар Кондакова, классный сейв Фролкина после кикса Гнапи. Да и дробящий мяч с попаданием в Бард

👍5616💯14😢3🥱2

29 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC≈4,710 views67 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Стартовый состав на игру с «Факелом» в 15:00 Несмотря на место воронежцев в таблице, «Зенит» в непростом положении — отсутствие Вендела, Педро, да и Дугласа Сантоса, как потенциальной альтернативы Маркусу, пусть и с немного иным функционалом, скажется на игре в центре поля. Перестановки масштабные. 🤔️ СБГ Аналитика

37👀16👍13🔥1

24 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈6,840 views137 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

От тактичного Семака такая прямота по ошибкам Джона и анонс возможной конкуренции за левый фланг с ЛЭ звучат жестко Понятно, что вопрос был конкретно про уязвимую зону «Спартака». Понятно, что игра у Джона не пошла — в атаке не удавалось вскрывать зону Жедсона, при обороне привычные сложности наслаивались на перестроения пары Литвинов-Жедсон. Но даже так, несколько атак Джон разогнал. Просто невозможно всегда выжим

👍8727💯20👎2🙉1

23 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈6,540 views107 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Очень неудачный тайм от «Зенита» Без мяча на старте не смогли навязать игру через атаки на пространстве. Прессинг провоцировали, но пройти без потерь не могли. С мячом утыкались в перекрытый центр Карседо, выводили мяч на левый фланг, откуда Вега подавал. Тоже не особо удачно. Ложка меда — движение Педро-Джона-Веги в принципе перспективно, но, во-первых, этого мало (как минимум, сегодня), во-вторых, моментов оно не

👍64💯356💔1🔥1

23 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈5,550 views50 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Стартовые составы на игру в 20:00 со «Спартаком» Семак без изменений. В запасе добавился Карпукас, но без Дугласа. Карседо выпускает Угальде, но оставляет в запасе Даку. Удивляет и выбор, и сам факт наличия центрального нападающего, учитывая прошлые матчи. Очень похоже, обе команды сыграют с условными 4-2-3-1. 🤔️ СБГ Аналитика

👍369👀4👎1

22 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC≈5,110 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Какие ожидания от 5 тура? Принимаем участие в «Лиге Звезд» по РПЛ от «РБ». Прямо сейчас на промежуточном первом месте. Но лига непредсказуемая, любой матч может ещё все перевернуть. Конкурс прогнозов, в котором могут принять участие все желающие

17👍9🔥3🤡2

19 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈7,080 views52 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Стартовый состав на игру в 16:15 с «Крыльями» Штаб дает отдохнуть тем, кто много играет в чемпионате. Небольшая интрига по тому, кто будет в центре опорным. В прошлый раз был Сантос. Но тогда слева будет непрофильный футболист. Тройка сзади тоже возможна. Опять же, в прошлый раз от нее пришлось отказываться прямо по ходу тайма. Пойдут ли на авантюру без центра поля ещё раз? Или это будет гибрид? 🤔️ СБГ Аналитика

👍44😱42👀2

16 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈7,660 views130 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Семак после игры поделился интересными деталями по заменам, учитывая контекст игры. Вполне откровенно, нужно заметить. Во-первых, тут можно обратить внимание на работу по повторяющимся ситуация с подачами на дальнюю от «Динамо», в частности, от Бителло. Во-вторых, есть оценка игры Веги. Вероятно, с установкой он также справился, Сергей Богданович говорил о дисциплинированности. В-третьих, отказ от выхода атакующег

👍10518🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @sbganalitica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTCAnonymous Poll2,180 voters approx.

Как относитесь к уходу Горшкова и потенциальному уходу Дркушича?

  1. Положительно37%
  2. Нейтрально43%
  3. Отрицательно13%
  4. Посмотреть результаты7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTCAnonymous Poll2,330 voters approx.

Данило из «Ботафого» в «Зените»?

  1. За19%
  2. Против45%
  3. Посмотреть результаты36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

#вЗените
@vzenite12 · 22,799
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 September 2026
Кафешка
@zenit_cafe · 25,511
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Футбольный клуб «Зенит»
@fczenit · 195,858
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Open the Doors | Дорский
@openthedoors · 25,584
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 14 September 2026
Зимин
@footballDiZzz · 24,250
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СБГ Аналитика (Зенит, сборная, тактика)” (@sbganalitica), 14,528 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sbganalitica.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.