Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СБГ Аналитика (Зенит, сборная, тактика)

Channel

СБГ Аналитика (Зенит, сборная, тактика)

@sbganalitica

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,632subscribers

-79 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001139036490
TypeChannel
Username@sbganalitica
DescriptionТактика, аналитика, оценка трансферов и фитнес статистика. Мы знаем о Зените все, часто пишем о других командах. Контакты: @sbganalitic @kalexeev (сотрудничество, реклама) Регистрация в РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/674ad0ce46efdb335e0cdcc1
Created9 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sbganalitica

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,52814,76114,644.514,6326 August 20268 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 94 days, net -79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,493–14,796 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 15:1614,632-10
7 Nov 2026, 12:4514,642-4
6 Nov 2026, 13:2414,646-11
5 Nov 2026, 15:1614,657+2
4 Nov 2026, 12:4914,655+13
3 Nov 2026, 14:3114,642+4
2 Nov 2026, 14:3914,638-14
1 Nov 2026, 17:4714,652-10
31 Oct 2026, 16:5514,662+1
30 Oct 2026, 17:2114,661-6
29 Oct 2026, 18:4614,667+1
28 Oct 2026, 16:5814,666-4
27 Oct 2026, 20:2914,670-4
26 Oct 2026, 18:2814,674-7
25 Oct 2026, 21:5514,681-20
24 Oct 2026, 19:2614,701-14
23 Oct 2026, 17:3014,715-3
22 Oct 2026, 20:4414,718-5
21 Oct 2026, 13:2914,723+4
20 Oct 2026, 08:5614,719first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.8%
avg views ÷ 14,632 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,240
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held55 (24 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total83,790
Reactions total1,106
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 06:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,260
Videos
≈23
Links
≈1,880

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,888 reactions across 55 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,08542.7%
❤1,11622.8%
👎4248.67%
🤔2855.83%
🔥2845.81%
💯2184.46%
🤮2044.17%
👀591.21%
🤡581.19%
🤬470.962%
💩180.368%
❤‍🔥160.327%
🏆110.225%
🗿70.143%
😁70.143%
🤷‍♂60.123%
✍50.102%
👏50.102%
😢40.082%
😱40.082%
16 further kinds250.511%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,888 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 55 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sbganalitica. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC≈2,450 views62 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Стартовые составы на игру с «Ростовом» в 18:30 Дивеев снова в запасе, как и Вендел. Штаб не форсирует возвращение. Наверняка, оба будут подводиться к играм после паузы на матчи сборных. А вот Педро и Соболев готовы уже сейчас. 🤔️ СБГ Аналитика

👍54❤5👀3

3 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC≈4,940 views145 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Коротко по матчу 1. Семак все-таки поставил Андраде левее, а Нино правее. Явные причины тому на поле не сильно проявлялись. Вариантов несколько. Например, подстраховка Мантуану под Салтыкова или акцент на быстрое включение Мантуана. Примечательно, Андраде вперед не стремился отдавать. 2. Визуальное впечатление. Поле медленное. Мяч в траве застревал то ли из-за скупого полива, то ли из-за высокой травы. Понятно, что…

👍110❤28👀6😭1

2 Nov 2026, 13:51 UTC≈4,630 views66 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Стартовые составы на игру с «Крыльями» в 18:00 Центр защиты все-таки составлен из Андраде и Нино. Дивеев в запасе. Не рискуют. Можно ожидать, что колумбиец будет правее, бразилец левее. Вместо Педро, который в запасе после болезни, Джон Джон. Скорее всего он начнет слева. Ну и Соболев возвращается на поле. Без Дивеева, Алипа или кого-то ещё с паспортом, лимит иначе не позволяет развернуться. 🤔️ СБГ Аналитика

👍48❤11👀4🔥3

2 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC≈4,470 views74 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

В комментариях возник вопрос о паспортах в состав. Кто, если не Алип? Бонусом к этом Сергей Богданович в интервью в очередной раз подчеркнул, клуб покупает тех, кого реально подписать. Если говорить о вариантах в оборону, самым простым и доступным выглядит возвращение Бардачева в следующем сезоне. Сейчас Матвей в аренде в «Факеле». Стоит отметить, играет много. Количественно по единоборствам за 90 минут даст фору…

❤46👍24❤‍🔥3🔥1

31 Oct 2026, 11:16 UTC≈5,000 views70 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Очень вероятно, что пара Нино-Дивеев вернется уже с «Крыльями». С «Балтикой», видимо, планировали дозировать нагрузку, но замену Алипа пришлось делать уже в перерыве. В плотном графике Нуралы выкладывался на 100%, но без явных ошибок не обошлось, с «Балтикой» свой тайм тоже не без шероховатостей провел. Андраде же был каким-то слишком мягким, что тоже не продвигает к месту на поле. Без Педро ожидаемо появится Джон.…

👍53❤14🔥2🤔1

30 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC≈4,880 views29 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @rbratingPhoto

🧤 Незабитый пенальти на 98-й минуте перевернул итоги «Лиги звёзд РБ»! ⚽️ 25 октября. «Зенит» — «Динамо» Махачкала. Последний матч этапа. Перед игрой у трёх лидеров было по 53 балла — СБГ Аналитика, #вЗените и OFNEWS. Следом шёл Simbirskiy Football Tears с 49 очками. Прогнозы участников: 🔹 СБГ Аналитика — 2:0 🔹 #вЗените — 3:1 🔹 OFNEWS — 1:0 🔹 Simbirskiy Football Tears — 3:0 А дальше начался настоящий кинотвист! ⏱️ …

👍17🔥7❤3👏1🗿1

29 Oct 2026, 17:54 UTC≈4,490 views59 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Стартовые составы на игру с «Балтикой» в 21:45 Из 5 номинальных защитников кто-то сыграет выше. Вероятно, Волков будет вингером, а Караваев под ним. Альтернатива — Андраде в опорной зоне, но там уже есть Барриос и Мусаев. Вариант с тройкой тоже исключать нельзя, но смысла в нем меньше. 🤔️ СБГ Аналитика

🔥32👍17❤10

29 Oct 2026, 14:28 UTC≈4,550 views61 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Отличительная особенность первой части сезона — количество ударов Глушенкова (крайняя правая точка) Как читать график: по вертикали ожидаемые голы в пересчете на удар, по горизонтали — удары за 90 минут, цвет обозначает точность попадания в створ. Почему обращаем на это внимание, в прошлых сезонах Макс тоже был в числе лидеров «Зенита» по среднему количеству ударов за матч, но такого заметного отрыва по лиге не име…

👍31❤25🔥5

26 Oct 2026, 17:29 UTC≈5,850 views95 reactionsread 9 November 2026

В этой рокировке больше всего удивляет повод, ставший последней каплей Никаких иллюзий, едва ли кто-то мог бы назвать Адамова идеальным вратарем для «Зенита». Слишком много требуется командных подстроек, чтобы перекрыть его слабые стороны. И именно поэтому не верю, что в деле инструмент для более сговорчивых переговоров по контракту. Мы предполагали, что уже весной Семак даст время Москвичеву. Уж слишком соблазните…

👍67❤12💯10🤔6

26 Oct 2026, 06:47 UTC≈5,910 views37 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Poll

Поменяли бы вы Адамова после игры с «Ахматом»?

  1. Да43%
  2. Нет28%
  3. Посмотреть результаты29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤔29👍5❤1👏1🔥1

25 Oct 2026, 17:48 UTC≈6,590 views84 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Заметили новую деталь на форме «Зенита»? Сегодня перед матчем с махачкалинским «Динамо» футболисты вышли на поле в обновленной форме с логотипом WINLINE SQUAD. Логотип отсылает к новой кампании WINLINE «Делай разницу», главным героем которой стал легенда футбола Эдгар Давидс. Идея кампании — объединить тех, кто не боится выделяться и менять привычный ход вещей. Эту идею поддержали и другие активности в день матча:…

🤡45👍25❤5👎4🏆2😁2👀1

25 Oct 2026, 16:21 UTC≈5,590 views89 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

На контрасте с «Ахматом» «Махачкала» играет не так агрессивно и почти не оставляет зон. Темп явно ниже. На своей половине поля дисциплинированно выстраивает линии, перекрывает большинство коридоров для передач. Высоко в прессинг не идет. Да и вообще не пытается давить. Мяч Нино и Алип могут разыгрывать в 50-60 метрах от своих ворот. Поэтому пропала визуальная легкость в создании моментов с ударами. Бежать некуда, …

❤48👍35🤔4💊1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @sbganalitica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Oct 2026, 06:47 UTCAnonymous Poll2,290 voters approx.

Поменяли бы вы Адамова после игры с «Ахматом»?

  1. Да43%
  2. Нет28%
  3. Посмотреть результаты29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Oct 2026, 14:08 UTCAnonymous Poll2,290 voters approx.

Центр на игру с «Махачкалой»

  1. Барриос — Карпукас21%
  2. Барриос — Вендел6%
  3. Вендел — Карпукас66%
  4. Другой вариант2%
  5. Посмотреть результаты5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTCAnonymous Poll2,180 voters approx.

Как относитесь к уходу Горшкова и потенциальному уходу Дркушича?

  1. Положительно37%
  2. Нейтрально43%
  3. Отрицательно13%
  4. Посмотреть результаты7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTCAnonymous Poll2,330 voters approx.

Данило из «Ботафого» в «Зените»?

  1. За19%
  2. Против45%
  3. Посмотреть результаты36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

#вЗените
@vzenite12 · 22,607
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 September 2026
Кафешка
@zenit_cafe · 25,615
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Рашен Football
@rashen_football · 20,160
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
ФК Зенит | Zenit fans
@zenitfans · 20,884
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
Футбольный клуб «Зенит»
@fczenit · 181,903
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Бесплатный Питер | Санкт-Петербург
@piter_free78 · 19,711
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 September 2026
Open the Doors | Дорский
@openthedoors · 25,518
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 14 September 2026
Зимин
@footballDiZzz · 24,585
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СБГ Аналитика (Зенит, сборная, тактика)” (@sbganalitica), 14,632 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sbganalitica.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.