Channel
@nosakh_shii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
10,349subscribers
+90 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001287849256 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nosakh_shii |
| Created | 30 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nosakh_shii |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 10,349 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 10,350 | +17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 10,333 | +14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 10,319 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 10,311 | +14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 10,297 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 10,291 | +17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 10,274 | +15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 10,259 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (6 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 50,410 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
پاسخی به ادعای باطل درباره «سلب علم» از امیرالمؤمنین علیهالسلام در لیلة المبیت دیده میشود اهل تسنن و برخی افراد دیگر ادعا میکنند که اگر حضرت امیرالمؤمنین سلاماللهعلیه در لیلةالمبیت از زنده ماندن خود علم نداشتند، اجرشان بیشتر میشد! و خوابیدن در بستر با فرض علم داشتن به عدم شهادت، دیگر فضیلتی نخواهد داشت! این سخن بیاساس نشاندهندهٔ عدم شناخت مقام آن حضرت است. توجه به نکات زیر ضروری است: ۱. مقامی فراتر از خوف…
بازخوانی نهضت ترجمه حلقههای مفقوده در انتقال فلسفه یونان به عالم اسلام از شهروندِ آتنی تا رعیتِ بغداد ✦༅✿༅✦═༅༅═┅── چکیده و خلاصهای از کتاب: https://t.me/kalam_shia/1079 ضرورت بازخوانی فلسفه یونان برای فهم فلسفه اسلامی و غرب: https://t.me/kalam_shia/1058 روایتهای نادرست از تاریخ غرب، از قرون وسطا تا رنسانس: https://t.me/kalam_shia/1062 تاریخ و رهایی از اسطورۀ تفاخر؛ تاریخ عرصۀ آگاهی است، نه میدان غرور یا شرم…
نقدی بر اشتباهات فراوان سیدمهدی رجایی در تصحیح رسائل سید مرتضی حمید عطایی نظری: http://kateban.com/post/2956 @nosakh_shii
انتقاد حسن انصاری از تصحیحهای نسخ خطی توسط سیدمهدی رجایی متون انساب سادات که در طی سی سال اخير منتشر شده عموما بايد از نو تصحيح شود. مملو از اغلاط است. در اينجا در تصحيح عمدة الطالب عجيب است که آقای سيد مهدی رجایی بنی وهاس را نشناخته! https://t.me/azbarresihayetarikhi/13251 پست مرتبط: انتقاد رسول جعفریان از بیدقتیهای سرشار سیدمهدی رجایی: https://t.me/nosakh_shii/1437 @nosakh_shii
معراجنامه =معراجیه کتابخانه مراد بخاری ترکیه، نسخه شماره ۷۱ اثری از قطب الدّین مظفر بن اردشیر سنجی عَبّادی مروزی واعظ (۴۹۱_۵۴۷ق) است که قرنها بعد از وفات ابنسینا، به اشتباه توسط امثال میرداماد به وی نسبت داده شد. همان رسالهای که جمله معروفِ "علی بین صحابه مانند معقول میان محسوس است" با استناد به آن به ابنسینا نسبت داده میشد. پیشتر دکتر یحیی مهدوی در فهرست مصنفات ابنسینا از قرائن جعلی بودن این رساله سخن گفته بو…
File, posted without a caption
از قدیمیترین نسخههای من لا یحضره الفقیه شیخ صدوق تاریخ استنساخ: محرم ۵۷۴ق جزء دوم کتاب مجمع دخائر اسلامی قم https://t.me/alfehrest/320 ✦༅✿༅✦═༅༅═┅── نسخهای نفیس دیگری از من لا یحضره الفقیه به خط ملا عبدالله تستری، به همراه اجازهای از مرحوم مجلسی به سبط علامه تستری https://t.me/nosakh_shii/842 نسخه کاملی از کتاب در کتابخانه مرعشی: https://t.me/nosakh_shii/809 حاشیه شیخ بهایی بر من لا یحضره الفقیه: https://t.me/…
بزودی... ابطال محو الموهوم محمدباقر رشاد زنجانی (تألیف: بین ۱۳۲۲ تا ۱۳۳۱ش) نقدی بر کتاب محو الموهوم شریعت سنگلجی @nosakh_shii
نقدی از حسن انصاری بر سید احمد مددی: بارها گفتهايم که نظريه فهرستی چون مستندات قوی ندارد ناچار به احتمالات بعيده پناه میبرد. اين يک نمونه آن است. روشن است که مسائل علي بن جعفر هيچ ربطی نه به کتاب/ مسائل حلبی دارد و نه چهارصد مسئله محمد بن مسلم. t.me/azbarresihayetarikhi/13173 @nosakh_shii
برخی از قدیمیترین نسخههای خطی بارگذاری شده در کانال: قدیمیترین نسخههای نهج البلاغه: نسخه کتابخانه مرعشی: https://t.me/nosakh_shii/2629 نسخه کتابخانه مرکز احیا: https://t.me/nosakh_shii/2626 قدیمیترین نسخه خطی اکمال الدین شیخ صدوق https://t.me/nosakh_shii/88 قدیمیترین نسخه الغیبة =غیبت نعمانی https://t.me/nosakh_shii/3994 قدیمیترین نسخه تفسیر فرات کوفی https://t.me/nosakh_shii/2492 قدیمیترین نسخه نهاية ال…
شیاد، مانند عبدالکریم سروش دکتر عبدالکریم سروش که نه دکتر است، نه نامش عبدالکریم است و نه فامیلیش سروش است، به دکتر موسی غنینژاد فحاشی کرده که چرا شریعتی را شیاد خواندی! او ارجاعهای دروغین به شخصیت موهوم پروفسور شاندل داده که داده! باید دهان تو را دوخت که با دهان آلوده درباره شریعتی سخن نگویی و... سروش درحالی به اظهارنظر غنینژاد درباره اسلامشناسی شریعتی فحاشی میکند و او را دارای صلاحیت در اینباره نمیداند که خ…
زمانپریشیِ سروش گسست روشنفکری از نسل جدید چند روزی است سخنان موسی غنینژاد _که عمدتا به دلیل نقدهای جالبش در حوزه اقتصاد محبوبیتی در فضای مجازی کسب کرده است_ علیه علی شریعتی به شدت پخش شده و توانسته موجی علیه شریعتی ایجاد کند. در این بین اما چند نفری نیز جهت دفاع از شریعتی بپا خاستهاند؛ این موج چنان شدید بود که سروش نیز پا به میدانِ دفاع از شریعتی گذاشت، اما نه عالمانه بلکه مثل همیشه در دستی چماق و در دستی مولوی! …
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @nosakh_shii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@nosakh_shii edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 3,408 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“میراث خطی شیعه” (@nosakh_shii), 10,349 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nosakh_shii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.