4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,618–1,626 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 03:15
1,625
+6
10 Aug 2026, 12:55
1,619
-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:15
1,621
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:03
1,621
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.2%
avg views ÷ 1,625 subscribers
Avg views / post
264
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
19 (28 May 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
3,692
Reactions total
31
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
14
36.8%
😭
14
36.8%
👍
7
18.4%
👎
2
5.26%
👌
1
2.63%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
در ادامه بحث نواصبی که در کتاب بخاری امده امد و بخاری از انها روایت نقل کرده است تعداد افرادی را به طور مفصل بحث کردیم
👈👈در ادامه فقط اسامی نواصب دیگری که بخاری از انها روایت نقل کرده است را بیان میکنیم:
👈اسحاق بن سوید بن هبیره
👈ثور بن یزید
👈حصین بن نمیر
👈سائب بن فروخ
👈زیاد بن جبیربن حبه
👈زیاد بن علاقه بن مالک ثعلبی
👈ابوقلابه عبدالله بن زید بن عمرو
👈عبدالله بن حبیب بن ربیعه ابو عبدالرحمن کوفی
👈 عبدالله بن س…
بلاخره معلوم شد که آیه جواز متعه نزد اهل سنت نسخ نشده است بلکه رواه اشتباه کردن و جایز است هنگام ضرورت!!
بلکه مولف کتاب میگه اقا چجور نسخی هست که زمان ابوبکر و عمر هم انجام میشده؟!! راه خلاصی اینه بگیم موقع ضرورت جایز هست
📕تفسیر التحریر و التنویر ابن عاشور جزء خامس ص۱۱تفسیر سوره نساء
#متعه
چه خوشبخت است طفلی که به حلقومش نگات افتد
چه خوشبخت است آن کس که روی نعشش عبات افتد
یکی با لب یکی با دل یکی با سر به پات افتد
دل سلطان عالم را به دست آوردن آسان نیست
بیابان گردمان کردی ولی زینب پشیمان نیست
به زیارت امام حسین علیه السلام بروید...
کسی که دست و بالش تنگ است و وسعت رزق میخواهد به زیارت کربلا برود
کسی که دفع بلا میخواهد به زیارت کربلا برود
کسی که طول عمر میخواهد به زیارت کربلا برود
همه خیرهای در این خانه است...
#حدیث | #امام_حسین
@nosakh_shii
#تحقیق_الاصول
وضع
۱- آيا ارتباط بين الفاظ و معانى، ذاتى است يا مربوط به وضع است؟ ۲- اگر ارتباط بين الفاظ و معانى مربوط به وضع است، آيا واضع چه كسى است؟ ۳- حقيقت و ماهيت وضع چيست؟ ۴- تقسيم وضع به اعتبار معنا. ۵- وضع شخصى و نوعى. ۶- وضع در حروف. ۷- خبر و انشاء. ۸- اسماء اشاره و ضماير.
مسأله اوّل كيفيت ارتباط بين الفاظ و معانى
بدون شك، در هر لغتى بين الفاظ و معانى ارتباط وجود دارد به نحوى كه انسان از لفظْ انتقال به …
ثانياً: در لغت عرب، الفاظى وجود دارد كه براى دو معنا يا بيشتر از دو معناى متضاد وضع شده است، مثل لفظ «قُرء» كه به معناى «طهر» و «حيض» آمده است و كلمه «جَوْن» كه براى «أسود» و «أبيض» وضع شده است. حال اگر ارتباط ذاتى بين لفظ و معنا را بپذيريم بايد قبول كنيم كه اين گونه الفاظ، اقتضاى دو معناى متضاد را دارند و نيز بايد بين دو معناى ذاتى در متضادين ايجاد علاقه كنيم و اين امر غير ممكن است. اين مطلب را آيت اللَّه خويى «دام …
غربت آن است که مردی مظلوم
شود از کینه یارش مسموم
و خلّف علیها رجل من قریش فأولدها غلاماً، فکان الصبیان یقولون له: يابن مسمِّمة الأزواج.
📚ربیع الابرار (للزمخشری)، ج۵، ص۱۵۷
پس از به شهادت رسیدن امام مجتبی علیهالسلام، جعده به همسری مردی قریشی درآمد و پسری از او به دنیا آورد که مردم او را چنین صدا میزدند: ای پسر زهر دهندهی شوهرها.
امام حسن مجتبی سلام الله علیه مسمومِ سقیفه !
✳️ "ابو الحسن خلیعی" شاعر شیعی قرن شش…
😭4👎1
Signed خادم العباس
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @asrar_almohammad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 110,452 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔹️اَســرار آل مــحــمــد(ص)🔹️” (@asrar_almohammad), 1,625 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asrar_almohammad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
