Channel
@nedvizhna24
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
52,382subscribers
-120 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001445969592 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nedvizhna24 |
| Description | Пылесосим лучшие практики застройщиков. Даём инсайды, выкладываем эксклюзивные предложения и делимся собственным мнением. Любые вопросы: @Alivian Работаем с @Tgpodbor_official, @swaymedia и @Spiral_Yuri Страница в РКН: https://clck.ru/3FTx4b |
| Created | 3 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nedvizhna24 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 52,382 | -16 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 52,398 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 52,404 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 52,413 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 52,421 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 52,434 | -24 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 52,458 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 52,469 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 52,475 | -15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 52,490 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 52,502 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 52,502 | first reading |
153 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 153 (4 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 487,760 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFGZE5zZ | 1 | 11 August 2026 | 11 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Ещё один дом по цене машино-места в Москве выставили на продажу в итальянской Тоскане. За €20 тысяч (пока меньше ₽2 миллионов) можно приобрести двухэтажный таунхаус на две спальни с видовой террасой. @nedvizhna
ЦБ снова ослабил рубль. Согласно официальным курсам валют на завтра, доллар теперь стоит ₽85,01, евро — ₽98,33, юань — ₽12,62. Такое резкое падение рубля в последнюю неделю может ускорить отток средств с депозитов и их конвертацию в квадратные метры ради спасения от обесценивания. @nedvizhna
В России построили более 50 миллионов квадратных метров жилья с начала года — Минстрой. Из них 19,3 миллиона «квадратов» — это многоквартирные дома, а 31,3 миллиона — ИЖС. @nedvizhna
ФАС направила производителям строительной арматуры запросы, чтобы оценить экономическую обоснованность ценообразования и установить причины повышения цен на продукцию. @nedvizhna
Ввод жилья в России в июле 2026 года составил 7,9 миллионов квадратных метров, следует из данных Росстата. Это на 5,7% больше, чем годом ранее. Однако накопленным итогом с января по июль объемы ввода все еще отстают от уровня 2025 года на 15%. @nedvizhna
Донстрой завершил выдачу ключей в шестом квартале «Острова» в Мневниковской пойме. Новый дом имеет необычный уступчатый силуэт фасада и угловое остекление в 70% квартир. Из окон резиденций открываются виды на парк Фили. Инфраструктура полностью готова: просторные светлые входные группы с мягкой мебелью, деловые пространства, функциональный фитнес-рум и игровая. На территории шестого квартала введен в эксплуатацию де…
Новую льготную ипотечную программу под 3% годовых предложили запустить в Госдуме. Депутаты от ЛДПР считают, что государству нужна «Народная ипотека» для рабочих и инженеров, которые заняты на отечественных производствах, чтобы они могли приобрести собственное жилье. @nedvizhna
Российский ВВП должен расти на 1,5-2% — ЦБ. Если рост будет выше, то начнется ее перегрев и рост инфляции. Для сравнения, в Китае власти начали бить тревогу, когда рост ВВП начал падать ниже 7%. @nedvizhna
Несмотря на статус туристических, стоимость квадратного метра в городах «Золотого кольца» на рынке вторичной недвижимости остается относительно доступной. Хотя в большинстве из них она и перешагнула ₽100 тысяч за «квадрат». При этом вторичка активно дорожает, вплоть до +2,7% всего за один месяц в Суздале. Исключение — Ростов Великий и Сергиев Посад, где цены снизились на 2,9% и 1,9% соответственно. Однако, по больше…
Спрос на вторичную недвижимость в Санкт-Петербурге стабилизировался на уровне примерно в 9,1 тысячи сделок в месяц, пишет ЦИАН. Это соответствует уровню продаж в докризисные 2018 и 2021 годы. @nedvizhna
Продажи новостроек упали почти на 8% в июле в среднем по России, пишет «Коммерсант». Эксперты связывают это с остыванием спроса после июньского пика. Сильнее всего продажи просели в Москве (-38% год к году), Краснодаре (-38%) и Екатеринбурге (-11%). @nedvizhna
₽23,6 миллиона нужно, чтобы комфортно жить в России на пенсии, подсчитали в сервисе Numbeo. Этой суммы должно хватить на почти 15 лет жизни с запасом в 20%. Однако в ней не учтены возможные медицинские расходы. @nedvizhna
Showing the 12 most recent of 153 posts we hold for @nedvizhna24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@nedvizhna24 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 43,096 of 1,507,151entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Не движется” (@nedvizhna24), 52,382 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nedvizhna24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.