Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for روزمرگی‌های یک روان‌درمانگر

Channel

روزمرگی‌های یک روان‌درمانگر

@DarmangarDanial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25,403subscribers

+416 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002039383049
TypeChannel
Username@DarmangarDanial
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DarmangarDanial

Growth

24,98725,40325,1955 August 2026 — 24,987 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,987 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,028 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,085 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,106 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,112 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,175 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,214 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,262 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,311 subscribers15 August 2026 — 25,340 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,403 subscribers5 August 202616 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net +416. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,925–25,465 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 19:1925,403+63
15 Aug 2026, 09:5325,340+29
14 Aug 2026, 00:5625,311+49
12 Aug 2026, 19:1325,262+48
11 Aug 2026, 20:4725,214+39
10 Aug 2026, 22:4525,175+63
10 Aug 2026, 01:4425,112+6
8 Aug 2026, 23:2125,106+21
7 Aug 2026, 20:1625,085+57
6 Aug 2026, 22:2225,028+41
6 Aug 2026, 02:0224,987no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:1924,987first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 25,403 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,410
78 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
78
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held78 (2 August 202616 August 2026)
Views total500,260
Reactions total19,252
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

17,763 reactions across 71 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17,763100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,252reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,990 views268 reactionsread 16 August 2026

یکی از تلخ‌ترین واقعیت‌های زندگی اینه که خوبی کردن، تضمینی برای خوبی دیدن نیست. آدم‌های مهربون هم آسیب می‌بینن، به آدم‌های صادق هم خیانت می‌شه. متاسفانه دنیا همیشه بر اساس شایستگی به ما پاداش نمی‌ده.

268

15 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC≈3,920 views307 reactionsread 16 August 2026

چیزی که اسمش رو گذاشتی تنبلی، شاید در واقع ذهنیه که مدت‌ها زیر فشار بوده و دیگه انرژی شروع کردن نداره.

307

15 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈4,420 views271 reactionsread 16 August 2026

شرم فقط باعث نمی‌شه احساس بدی داشته باشی. باعث می‌شه کم‌کم خودت رو پنهان کنی. کمتر حرف بزنی، کمتر درخواست کمک کنی و کمتر خودت باشی. شرم هویتت رو هدف می‌گیره.

271

15 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC≈4,850 views222 reactionsread 16 August 2026

توضیح دادنِ زیادِ یه تصمیم، معمولاً نشونه‌ی اطمینان نیست؛ نشونه‌ی تلاش برای متقاعد کردنِ خودمونه. کسی که واقعاً مطمئنه، کمتر نیاز به توجیه و توضیح داره.

222

15 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC≈4,600 views151 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @GHOSSTEEN

دقیقا، یکی از دلایلی که زندگی‌کردن رو عقب می‌اندازیم اینه که می‌ترسیم از رها کردن ورژنِ فعلی خودمون چرا که نسخه‌ی بعدی‌مون، مبهمه و این ابهام چیزی نیست که مغز ازش خوشش بیاد.

151

15 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC≈5,510 views273 reactionsread 16 August 2026

وقتی سال‌ها با اضطراب، سوگ یا تروما زندگی کردی، درمان و بهبودی می‌تونه خیلی ترسناک باشه. چون باید نسخه‌ی آشنای قدیمی خودت رو رها کنی و با نسخه‌ی غریب و جدیدی از خودت روبرو بشی.

273

14 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC≈5,410 views213 reactionsread 16 August 2026

بعضی وقت‌ها رو هم باید خسته باشی و همه چیزو رها کنی. به خودت اجازه‌ی خسته بودن بده.

213

14 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈5,740 views230 reactionsread 16 August 2026

سرانجامِ تسلیمِ ترس شدن، ناتوانیه؛ و سرانجام ناتوانی، از دست دادنِ اون آدم فوق‌العاده‌ای که می‌تونستی باشی.

230

14 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈5,730 views201 reactionsread 16 August 2026

هر بار که از چیزی فرار می‌کنی، ذهنت فکر می‌کنه اون چیز واقعاً خطرناک بوده. به‌مرور، ترست بزرگ‌تر از خود اون موضوع می‌شه؛ تا جایی که ترس جاش رو به ناتوانی می‌ده. دیگه نمی‌ترسی، چون دیگه اصلاً خودت رو در حد اون کار نمی‌بینی.

201

14 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC≈5,410 views153 reactionsread 16 August 2026

ترسناک‌ترین بخشِ این تغییراتِ بی‌صدا، اینه که وقتی به خودت میای، می‌بینی حتی دیگه نمی‌دونی چطور باید به اون نسخه سابقت برگردی، انگار راه برگشت به خودِ واقعی‌ت، زیرِ لایه‌هایی از عادت‌های جدید دفن شده.

153

14 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC≈6,460 views261 reactionsread 16 August 2026

بعضی رابطه‌ها اونقدر آهسته تغییرت می‌دن که خودت هم نمی‌فهمی کِی تبدیل شدی به این نسخه‌ای که دوستش نداری.

261

13 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC≈6,080 views193 reactionsread 16 August 2026

گاهی سکوتِ کسی که بهت نزدیکه، از هزار جمله‌ی همدلی ارزشمندتره. این سکوت می‌گه لازم نیست خوب باشی، همین‌جوری بودنِ تو در همین لحظه، پذیرفته‌شده‌ست.

193

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @DarmangarDanial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 5,200 of 1,481,277entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

پیانیستی که پیانو نداره!
@The_Dead_Pianist · 13
10 posts
باگ نویس فعلی، کشاورز آینده
@averagebpdguy · 66
6 posts
•🍂 هـر روز پاييزه 🍂•
@fallinfall · 154
3 posts
بیا در موردش حرف بزنیم.
@Mehraban_68i · 246
3 posts
" ࡄِ❟ࡅ࡙ߺܝ‌ߊ‌‌ "
@seeeviiiraaa · 191
3 posts
Nefelibata
@blueMarrow · 24
2 posts
"روزمرگی‌های یک روانشناسِ آینده"
@FDpsychology · 60
2 posts
مَرد سان‌فرانسیسکویی
@In_Search_of_San_Francisco · 17,420
2 posts
𝕯𝖗𝖆𝖌𝖔𝖓
@lDragoonl · 2,059
2 posts
دلبر که جان فرسوده از او...
@mmoonlikee · 54
2 posts
امید در لب مرز
@omidlabemaarz · 6,930
2 posts
روان درمانگرِ ٫آینده٫
@pen296 · 580
2 posts
ابری‌کوچولو
@abrikoochooloo · 1,144
1 post
𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐝𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐲🕊️
@atenadairy · 127
1 post
La vie
@closetoAva · 84
1 post
مرگِ آسان
@easydeathbinas · 1
1 post
منی که تمام می‌شود.
@EndOfMe405 · 343
1 post
FOu!
@F0o0u · 7,775
1 post
Flowtica
@Flowticaa · 18
1 post
گریبان
@gari_ban · 140
1 post
«قلم‌گاه»
@Ghalam_Gah · 3,033
1 post
مثلاً روانشناسم!
@HadisPsychologist · 13,559
1 post
هُبوط
@hobotm · 2,881
1 post
به ابرها زد و گم شد •
@ifyouarecomingcome · 393
1 post
جوون اولِ آسایشگاه .
@javoonaval · 382
1 post
ساقی
@justsaqhiandme · 2,576
1 post
کُنجِ خلوتم :)
@konje_khalvatam · 2,850
1 post
نارنگی
@maeffar · 758
1 post
مخفیگاه من
@makhfigaheman · 3,493
1 post
من؛ سارا
@mansaraa · 1,194
1 post
مرز خیال
@Marzkhial · 349
1 post
🪷
@maybenewera · 25
1 post
میِلین
@Myelinpsy · 44
1 post
AseMooN!
@Myesky · 1,926
1 post
ALWAYS
@myparabatai · 2,589
1 post
نیل‌سآ🪁
@Nila_nik7 · 1,576
1 post
You are art
@niltut · 48
1 post
رَوَن
@panjerehrobebaran · 102
1 post
Sahar Pharma
@pharmacistsahar · 1,239
1 post
آبیِ سنگین
@prvaz_ir · 1,149
1 post
[ناگفته ها]
@re_best_le · 178
1 post
Realism podcast
@realismpodcast · 33
1 post
🍼.16
@tbeautiful_22 · 8
1 post
Daily Digest
@thedailydigestt · 4,475
1 post
🕊️❄️✨⟨اورکا⟩
@ThelonelistwhaleB · 434
1 post
واگویه ›
@Vaguooyeh · 5,188
1 post
.نَدیمه.
@yccmenadiii · 58
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روزمرگی‌های یک روان‌درمانگر” (@DarmangarDanial), 25,403 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DarmangarDanial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.