我是女权主义者。但是如果一种女权主义不能让人走向更加开放、自由的爱、欲与性接触,而是走向保守、维护单性别空间,或者让人与人的交流变得小心翼翼,那么我不认同这种女权主义,也不做这种女权主义者。 我不支持提高性同意年龄至18岁。
❤14🤔3🥰3

Channel
@ShuChann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,599subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001208634968 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShuChann |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShuChann |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 1,599 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 1,598 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 1,599 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:09 | 1,599 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,068 |
| Reactions total | 73 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
73 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 50.7% | |
| 😢 | 18 | 24.7% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 15.1% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 5.48% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 4.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
我是女权主义者。但是如果一种女权主义不能让人走向更加开放、自由的爱、欲与性接触,而是走向保守、维护单性别空间,或者让人与人的交流变得小心翼翼,那么我不认同这种女权主义,也不做这种女权主义者。 我不支持提高性同意年龄至18岁。
❤14🤔3🥰3
风铃轻响,捕梦入眠 pinned a photo
Hi folks, I will be hosting a panel at #Otakuthon Montréal on trans/queer readings of popular Visual Novels such as the Song of Saya, Subahibi, etc.. It’s at Saturday night (after 12am so technically Sunday) and hope y’all will come! (18+ event)
🥰5
我是Seele,相信知道我的人也都知道我是做什么的在做什么,这就不一一赘述了。 鉴于种种原因,主要是Trans和戒网瘾方面的事情,让我有些入不敷出。 个人来讲,我有一些微薄的收入供给我的个人生活,主要是文字创作和一些朋友的支持带来的收益,但是要用以我支持Trans和戒网瘾相关的会动就不够看了。 我来讲一下其中的主要花费,主要集中在三个维度,软件使用费、设备使用费、“意外的”额外花费。 软件主要是文字工作和舆论工作的需要,相信相关工作经历的朋友都知道,我本人在做多个维度的事情,所以各种软件开了很多会员,很多都是不好去替代的或者免费的无法使用。 设备主要是由于我会给“一些人”提供一些必要的电子设备,这个我也不会过多赘述了,目前都是我自己出钱在二手市场淘换一些二手机。 意外花费就比较五花八门了,偶尔给急需帮助的人打一点钱、路费或者买买推流。 很多trans项目都是我在带的,但是我不会以他们的名义去收钱或者盈利,我也不好意思向大家暴露…
Photo, posted without a caption
まのさば 新刊
看到有人穿了件红色的衣服上面写着 I will praise you, Lord. 我想说 the best way to praise the Lord is to praise your neighbour…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
我不想要当霸凌者。我绝对不想当霸凌者。我会努力更加谨言慎行的。如果别人批评我「注意不要搞霸凌」,我会觉得,我有则改之无则加勉。但是唯独在一些随手就能指责数百人「霸凌」「网暴」的人那里,因为我不知道这样的人到底怎么定义「霸凌」和「网暴」,才能得到一个地方大多数人都在「霸凌」和「网暴」的结论,所以我没办法对这样的人的指责诚心诚意地说有则改之无则加勉。因为相信一个地方大多数人都在「纵容作恶」,都是「恶」的,这样不是注定更不可能做到包容吗? 无论如何请相信我在为一个更包容的社群而努力。我会用行动证明的。
😢6❤5
打破僵局 —— 真正解决激进派反贼圈子中的性侵和虐待问题。 性侵犯与性虐待问题持续困扰着一些激进派圈子和活动空间。为此,前线的同志们制定了在国家体制之外相互问责的机制。 但为何这些机制似乎始终难以完善? 本文将考察这些社区问责机制诞生的背景,剖析实践过程中遭遇的困境。 要突破我们的圈子内部性暴力问题的僵局,就必须重新审视"社群"这一概念本身,将抗争引向新的方向。 🧬《是否有比米兔更好的解决方案?如何?:超越米兔S09E01》 https://iyouport.notion.site/S09E01-28734ca2d46d80c8962bdb16a874c492 #团队 #个人 #性暴力 #米兔 #问责 #纠纷 #自治 #治愈 #关系 #组织
看到这个一时心情很复杂,但还是决定发出来,算是引以为戒 https://t.me/twitter_translate/31764
【活动不限时回归中】点击此链接申请加入本人私人限制访问频道,并可以从其中加入本人私人限制访问群组。 认识我,和我私聊过表明来意,或者和我有至少一个 100 人以下的共同群组,可以申请加入。 礼尚往来。如果你被我加入私人群组,并且你有挂在个人 profile 里面的私人频道或者私人群,请也同意我进入。 https://t.me/+CmWuTEEGpIhhOTcx
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ShuChann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 571,428 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“风铃轻响,捕梦入眠” (@ShuChann), 1,599 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShuChann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.