其实跨子经常就是你身边最卑鄙最为你不耻的那个以为是极右顺直的人,玩烂俗梗,有些不洁甚至不道德的嗜好,谈不上在管自己的个人卫生,自我为中心既自卑又期待所有人都注意自己,没有任何称得上优秀的个人特质——跟每个人都一样 或者换个说法,既然任何人都可以是,跨子为什么不能是这个人?
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR

Channel
@RichardAndLotus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,148subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001281839398 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RichardAndLotus |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RichardAndLotus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 1,148 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 1,149 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 1,149 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
其实跨子经常就是你身边最卑鄙最为你不耻的那个以为是极右顺直的人,玩烂俗梗,有些不洁甚至不道德的嗜好,谈不上在管自己的个人卫生,自我为中心既自卑又期待所有人都注意自己,没有任何称得上优秀的个人特质——跟每个人都一样 或者换个说法,既然任何人都可以是,跨子为什么不能是这个人?
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR
数字马戏团的一个叫jax的角色出柜为跨女,这个设定被许多中国粉丝描述为毫无征兆,生搬硬套,空降属性,政治正确 说真的我没看过数字马戏团,但是我出柜的时候朋友也是这么看待我的 毫无征兆,突然,会被人怀疑是否经过深思熟虑 我想每个人的生活都不太一样,但唯独一点我可以确定,跨子没有义务提前十年说,“我考虑当个跨子”,再等十年说“我现在是个跨子”
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR
警报解除(
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR
请关注🇲🇲军政府访华
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR
一个本来有固定意义的书面语言、学术语言,在政治语境中往往有完全不一样的含义。 作为一个时政完全在专业以外的人,最近在这些地方偶有一得,又感觉到学无止境了。 比如历史虚无主义,前阵子封杀历史正剧和历史幻想小说剧的一个帽子,在搞明白历史的政治意义前是完全不知道领导想干什么的。说历史有为政权正确性背书的价值,说历史有建立文化自信的内宣意义,那反过来就是历史虚无主义了,这跟“虚无主义”没有一点点关系,只是随便用了这个名字罢了。
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR
*非常抱歉,因为评论区卖片的太多了,本频改为加入讨论群组才能评论
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR
高考生喊话性同意年龄这个事,真正让我愤怒的还是话题屏蔽讨论消失 不论让渡权利换取保护,还是尊重自由承担责任,哪个选择是更合理的(或者谈一谈房间里更大的大象,关系内强奸,无暴力威胁强奸这些),我都乐意开放地去看待它,和其它公民一起寻找可能性 最糟糕的莫过于讨论消失,没有参政议政的通道,至于“谤讥于市朝”都不可能,一个不能谈论的法律究竟是更有权威,还是经不起推敲,公民自有分辩 说到底,高考完接受采访的时候才能议政,本身就挺不可思议的
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR
14岁性同意而非18背后还有关系内强奸和非暴力胁迫强奸在我们法律体系下难以定罪的问题 换而言之14岁到18岁小孩依然有权利谈恋爱搞关系,做爱,关系内的性怎么也定不成强奸,低于14就怎么都算强奸 这当然是一种懒政
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR
投稿: 说到最近高考生呼吁提高性同意年龄的事,本质是考生希望赋予未成年性和选择的权力,关于这个话题其实有很多值得讨论的,我们可以一起梳理一下。 1.对于“界定更低年龄的性同意是否能赋权”? 现行司法体系更接近用个体失权换群体稳定的“我为你负责”模式。“性同意”可以是权力,但结合法律对强奸的定义,和公民权力的局限性,个人认为通过法律规定性同意年龄,这件事已经和真正讨论性同意场景,也就是赋权场景相去甚远了。因此我们讨论的场景可以转化为“如何在现行规则下争取性同意权” 2.为什么14+有性同意的权力,结合当下的社会状态,这是否太(早/晚)? 关于14+的年龄设置,具体规则参考了身体和认知的发育过程,但我认为除了这些普适的客观推论,是否有权选择社会身份才是能否表达性同意的考量重点。 我们知道监护人、老师、医生、辅导员、寄养照料人等有“权威者”身份的人和未成年进行性行为会被纳入强奸,也就是说有特殊关系会让性同意年龄拉高至16-18…
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR
Jim Queen - Official Clip 吉姆皇后是一部…… 我不太好总结的酷儿电影,想让部员们讨论一下这部pv给你什么样的感觉
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR
寄
Signed FREEDOM FROM FEAR
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RichardAndLotus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 213,562 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东亚爱俱乐部” (@RichardAndLotus), 1,148 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RichardAndLotus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.