Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TheDRZJ

Channel

TheDRZJ

@TheDRZJ

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,032subscribers

+423 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001503798478
TypeChannel
Username@TheDRZJ
DescriptionПОДДЕРЖКА И 500+ ЧАСОВ БОНУСОВ: https://www.patreon.com/TheDRZJ (любые не-ру карты) https://web.tribute.tg/l/1oD (USDT или любые карты) ПРЕДЛОЖИТЬ НОВОСТЬ: @drzj_predlojka_bot РАЗБАН В ЧАТЕ: @drzj_unban_bot Канал Дрюзая - обо всем, что ему интересно.
CreatedBetween 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheDRZJ

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

28,60929,15928,8847 August 2026 — 28,609 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,617 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,684 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,731 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,752 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,765 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,770 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,777 subscribers15 August 2026 — 28,780 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,768 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,769 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,774 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,799 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,840 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,872 subscribers22 August 2026 — 28,903 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,922 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,915 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,963 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,003 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,059 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,085 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,093 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,113 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,109 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,128 subscribers4 September 2026 — 29,140 subscribers6 September 2026 — 29,131 subscribers10 September 2026 — 29,125 subscribers12 September 2026 — 29,123 subscribers14 September 2026 — 29,159 subscribers15 September 2026 — 29,146 subscribers18 September 2026 — 29,032 subscribers29,0327 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +423. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,527–29,242 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:3929,032-114
15 Sept 2026, 19:0129,146-13
14 Sept 2026, 04:3929,159+36
12 Sept 2026, 09:1729,123-2
10 Sept 2026, 03:0229,125-6
6 Sept 2026, 19:1429,131-9
4 Sept 2026, 10:1929,140+12
2 Sept 2026, 20:4229,128+19
1 Sept 2026, 18:1529,109-4
31 Aug 2026, 18:0729,113+20
30 Aug 2026, 18:3829,093+8
29 Aug 2026, 17:4429,085+26
28 Aug 2026, 16:3429,059+56
27 Aug 2026, 18:4929,003+40
26 Aug 2026, 17:3928,963+48
25 Aug 2026, 15:5828,915-7
24 Aug 2026, 12:2828,922+19
22 Aug 2026, 17:4728,903+31
21 Aug 2026, 09:5328,872+32
20 Aug 2026, 11:5228,840first reading

Engagement

736 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.9%
avg views ÷ 29,032 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,300
241 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
244
of 736 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held736 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total3,210,480
Reactions total73,920
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 06:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈9,350
Videos
≈1,660
Links
≈4,320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 25m
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 88 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

213,288 reactions across 726 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁75,40435.4%
🤣46,28421.7%
❤28,29613.3%
👍10,8505.09%
🔥10,3754.86%
🫡8,5234.00%
😢6,1202.87%
🤯4,8742.29%
🤔3,2291.51%
🤨3,0561.43%
💯2,8481.34%
🥰1,6620.779%
🤝1,6050.753%
👏1,3640.64%
❤‍🔥1,3500.633%
✍1,2710.596%
😱1,2330.578%
💔9950.467%
☃5950.279%
🤩5710.268%
12 further kinds2,7831.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 726 of the 736 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213,288 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 736 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
97
across the posts below
Posts paid on
43
of 726 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheDRZJ. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 736 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 23:47 UTC≈7,410 views433 reactionsread 27 September 2026

МУЖИКИ И ДАМЫ, мы с моей командой сделали за месяц сделали 2 ЧАСА 10 МИНУТ КОНТЕНТА прайм-качества 🤯 (без учета хрона интеграцией и лабуды) и чуток УТОМИЛИСЬ - и если вы считаете, что это ЗАСЛУЖИВАЕТ РЭСПЕКТА - то вы ЗНАЕТЕ КАК ВОССТАНОВИТЬ НАШУ СТАМИНУ - не поленитесь ЛАЙКНУТЬ ОБЗОРИЩЕ, прожать под ним ХАЙП и поделиться им с друзьями. Обзор 100% спойлер-фри, я давал его людям прошедшим и не-прошедшим игру на отсмотр…

❤350💯32🤣27🔥9🤨8😁4👍2👏1

26 Sept 2026, 23:30 UTC≈7,840 views192 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🔥🔥 РПГ ПРО СКУФА ДЕЛАЛИ 7(!) ЛЕТ 🔥🔥 Я ПРОШЁЛ новую CONTROL RESONANT от легендарных REMEDY - и эта игра, ЦЕЛИКОМ СОСТОЯЩАЯ ИЗ ОБМАНА. Даже RTX 5090 работает тут ХОРОШО и ПЛОХО ОДНОВРЕМЕННО😳 - но зато ТУТ ЕСТЬ ТАКАЯ Х*ЙНЯ, КОТОРОЙ МЫ НЕ ВИДЕЛИ УЖЕ 10 ЛЕТ (и я не про отражения в зеркалах). ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ https://youtu.be/NQisx5DwmCI 🚀Забрать легендарный VPNZAJ - https://telegram.me/vpnzaj_bot ПОДДЕРЖАТЬ и БОНУС-КОНТЕНТ:…

❤150🔥25👍6💋3💯2🤨2😁2👌1

26 Sept 2026, 22:06 UTC≈9,150 views173 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Глава Microsoft назвал перестройку XBOX позитивным шагом Глава Microsoft Сатья Наделла (Satya Nadella) положительно оценил изменения в игровом подразделении компании. По словам руководителя, он относится к нынешнему составу студий и портфолио XBOX с оптимизмом, а проводимую реструктуризацию считает хорошим шагом. Подробнее на StopGame

😁129👍22🤣15❤2✍1❤‍🔥1🔥1🤨1

26 Sept 2026, 22:06 UTC≈9,000 views77 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Бывший дизайнер Bethesda рассказал, почему The Elder Scrolls не получила спин-офф в духе Fallout: New Vegas За время своего существования франшиза The Elder Scrolls так и не получила полноценный спин офф в духе Fallout: New Vegas. Одной из причин может быть особое отношение Bethesda к своей главной RPG серии. Об этом рассказал бывший ведущий разработчик The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim и бывший хранитель лора TES Курт Ку…

😁63👍6🤨6❤2

26 Sept 2026, 20:34 UTC≈10,400 views327 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Ubisoft, Capcom и FumiHQ к выпуску Control Resonant подготовили тематические рисунки, чтобы поздравить Remedy с релизом.

❤306👏9🤣9☃2😁1

26 Sept 2026, 20:28 UTC≈10,100 views146 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @found_sunduchok

Джейсон Шрайер и Джез Корден отвергли сведения про бюджет в 400 млн долларов у Physint для Xbox.

🤣125👍21

26 Sept 2026, 20:16 UTC≈9,990 views186 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @ninotok

Так называемые «выборы» позади, а, значит, впереди - все, что Кремль откладывал: новые налоги и мобилизация. Россия может забрать около 300 тысяч человек на фронт - об этом говорит мировая пресса, украинская разведка, а теперь еще и Макрон. Вместе с основателем движения «Идите лесом» Григорием Свердлиным мы записали ПОДРОБНЕЙШУЮ ИНСТРУКЦИЮ: что делать, если будет объявлена мобилизация? Что делать, если вас принуждаю…

🫡120👍27🤣15😁10❤9🤨2☃1🤔1

26 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC≈11,700 views392 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁347❤24🔥13🤨5🤣3

26 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC≈11,700 views224 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Впервые за год сам занимаюсь финальным сведением обзора и саунддизигном видео, скачивание Вегаса 26 ощущалось примерно так:

🔥152😁66🤨6

26 Sept 2026, 17:55 UTC≈12,200 views534 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁315🤣187🤨11🤯6❤5🫡4👍2🔥2

26 Sept 2026, 17:32 UTC≈12,400 views420 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Бюджет Physint оценивается примерно в $400 млн, если верить The Game Business. По их словам, именно на такую сумму Кодзима заключил сделку с Xbox. Остаётся только представить, сколько в таком случае могла заплатить PlayStation. Мир PlayStation

😱314🤯59🤣34❤4😁3👍2🔥2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 736 posts we hold for @TheDRZJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@TheDRZJ edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 September 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

hypewave
@hypewave · 54,722
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
Коммандер
@ilya_commander · 48,347
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Майзенберг
@meizzenberg · 41,810
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
DTF
@dtfbest · 57,722
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
SonnyK
@sonnyk1997 · 44,486
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Мир PlayStation
@world_playstation · 307,979
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
Ремонтяш
@realremontyash · 57,313
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
Вестник Шевцова
@jolynews · 208,388
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 359,059
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TheDRZJ” (@TheDRZJ), 29,032 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheDRZJ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.