International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -288. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120,366–120,746 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:17
120,410
-34
11 Aug 2026, 14:36
120,444
-38
10 Aug 2026, 11:51
120,482
-86
9 Aug 2026, 12:01
120,568
-67
8 Aug 2026, 15:21
120,635
-67
7 Aug 2026, 16:16
120,702
+52
6 Aug 2026, 13:20
120,650
-48
6 Aug 2026, 01:32
120,698
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:45
120,698
first reading
Engagement
131 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.8%
avg views ÷ 120,410 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,800
131 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.394%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
131
of 131 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
131 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
2,331,539
Reactions total
9,189
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈20,100
Videos
≈11,300
Links
≈17,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 43m
Average length
3m 26s
Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,044 reactions across 111 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,132
26.5%
💯
1,332
16.6%
🤬
1,073
13.3%
❤
654
8.13%
🔥
509
6.33%
😁
470
5.84%
🤪
353
4.39%
🤔
338
4.20%
custom 5357233044694508227
331
4.11%
🤣
241
3.00%
🙏
233
2.90%
💊
84
1.04%
👎
81
1.01%
😈
73
0.908%
🤯
60
0.746%
👏
41
0.51%
😱
31
0.385%
👀
7
0.087%
😢
1
0.012%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 131 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,189reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Зеля заявил, что "Путин не хочет останавливать войну, но мы его заставим", поскольку у Украины и ее партнёров "есть план".
Ну, разве что такой же, как зелина "40-дневная стратегия по принуждению Москвы к миру". От её результатов укроресурсы уже воют, предполагая, что зима будет действительно "чёрной", т.к. в 404 все ТЭЦ пострадали от ударов (об этом говорил и сам Зеленский), а подготовка к отопительному сезону в сре…
При этом Киев запросил снижение ж/д тарифов на 50% для данного маршрута. Молдова несколько в шоке: обычно она просит у кого-то, а тут что-то просят у неё😏
Интересно, что в 404 считают отгрузку зерна по железной дороге через Молдову более безопасным вариантом экспорта, чем морем. А что, прилететь не может? Ещё как, вполне досягаемая и явная цель.
@Metametrica
Мы в МАХ
Не совсем понятно, к какому "международному сообществу" обращаются в МИД. К тому, которое все эти годы заняло "нейтральную" позицию и периодически призывает к миру? Так раз оно и до этого ничего не осуждало, почему должно "объективно отреагировать" сейчас? Или к тому, которое все эти годы вооружает, финансирует Киев и координирует эти самые удары?
Примерно те же вопросы и к тезису представителя МИД о том, что "удары…
🥴 Так себе реклама для "Яблока", конечно (хотя их уже немногое может дискредитировать ещё больше): просроченный решил связать выборы в Госдуму с проведением СВО и фактически поддержал партию "Яблоко", выразив своё важное мнение с критикой её исключения из списков.
Ты там выборы в своей 404 поддержи для начала, идиотина!
@Metametrica
Мы в МАХ
Яков Кедми на Metametrica
Подписчики наших платных каналов посмотрят выпуск первыми.
Расширенная версия +20 минут без цензуры и ограничений уже доступна на закрытых площадках!
🇮🇱 Почему Израиль не добился политических целей, и каковы реальные военные успехи?
🇮🇷 Как Иран уже достиг главного, даже не создавая ядерное оружие?
🇺🇸 Почему США больше не способны диктовать свою волю Ближнему Востоку?
🤩 Политика Трампа …
По словам Кобахидзе, этого не произойдет, пока РФ признает независимость Абхазии и Южной Осетии. Ну, то есть никогда. Грузинский премьер, прежде чем бросаться такими громкими заявлениями, должен бы понимать, что невозможно представить ситуацию, про которую он говорит. Если только Абхазия и Южная Осетия сами не решат вернуться в состав Грузии — что тоже невозможно представить.
@Metametrica
Мы в МАХ
Украинцы, попрошайничающие для ВСУ в центре Лондона с флагами Украины и чёрно-красными тряпками УПА, внезапно наткнулись на поляка, который из своего Bentley назвал из "бандеровцами и националистами". Сделать любители грошей ничего не смогли, лишь с завистью смотрели вслед обладателю дорогущей машины😏
@Metametrica
Мы в МАХ
"Нет таких боевых задач, которые не могла бы решать морская пехота Тихоокеанского флота. Бригада действует дерзко, профессионально и героически" — Путин.
В Южно-Сахалинске Президент осмотрел гвардейский ракетный крейсер "Варяг»", посетил походный храм и музей корабля, а также оставил запись в Книге почётных посетителей корабля.
@Metametrica
Мы в МАХ
#КакиеНовости
✔️ В Краснодарском крае предотвращён теракт в отношении офицера Минобороны России. По данным ФСБ, мужчина действовал по заданию украинских спецслужб: он планировал взорвать автомобиль сотрудника военкомата. Был задержан с поличным в момент, когда пытался забрать взрывчатку из закладки.
✔️ Тихоокеанский флот готов задерживать суда недружественных стран и их "теневого флота" — командующий флотом Виктор …
🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ Замдиректора ИСИП РУДН, член ОП РФ Никита Данюк:
⚡️ «Главным бенефициаром судоходства на Чёрном море всегда была Турция, причём это касается как перевозок зерна, так и боеприпасов. Но буквально за месяц Украина фактически лишилась выхода в Чёрное море на фоне наших ударов, и Турция сразу же активизировалась со своими инициативами по перемирию на море. Как только Россия достигает важных результатов, Ан…
"Суд признал бывшего президента Сирии виновным в преступлениях, совершенных во время гражданской войны".
Суд. В нынешней Сирии. Большей пародии на суд представить сложно. Если бы в суде рассматривали все преступления, которые совершили нынешние сирийские "власти", то места для томов судебного дела не хватит.
@Metametrica
Мы в МАХ
Просто действия Японии вписываются в общий тренд целого ряда преимущественно западных стран по пересмотру итогов Второй мировой войны. Ведь к нему же можно отнести и переписывание истории. Просто Токио делает это давно и довольно рьяно, возможно, воодушевившись некими бредовыми сомнительными идеями среди российского руководства в 90-х. Более шансов что-то там вернуть у Токио нет.
Путин в Южно-Сахалинске, в ходе визи…
👍56💯18🙏9❤5😁2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @Metametrica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Metametrica edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 34,016 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Metametrica named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@radio_sputnik named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@rt_russian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ШАХНАЗАРОВ @iikhu · 156,796 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
#МОНТЯН! @montyan2 · 305,225 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Хазин @khazinml · 246,051 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Кот Костян - официальный канал🇷🇺 @kotreal · 158,590 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
БЕСОГОН @nikitabsg · 393,131 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
ГАСПАРЯН @ASGasparyan · 176,652 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
ШЕЙНИН @GardeZ66 · 254,292 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Профессор смотрит в мiръ. Авторский Анонимный канал Дмитрия Евстафьева @dimonundmir · 208,922 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МЕТАМЕТРИКА” (@Metametrica), 120,410 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Metametrica.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.