Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Зио

@zio402

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

45,503subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001208392963
TypeChannel
Username@zio402
Descriptionhttps://www.youtube.com/c/Зио402 - основа https://boosty.to/zio - бусти https://t.me/+Q29OzfW-ilIzYzli - нормальный чат twitch.tv/zio310 - игровые стримы Реклама/Сотрудничество: https://t.me/xwhitewx
Created26 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zio402

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

38,000 average views per post against 45,503 subscribers — an engagement rate of 83.5%. Across the 7,904 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,961 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.93% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.4%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured29 of 30 published in the window (0 exact, 29 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,102,200
Mature posts only83.5% over 29 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers45,503 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 7,904 channels · p10 2.39% · p25 4.93% · p50 10.4% · p75 21.0% · p90 37.1%
Position in cohort99.291th percentile · 8.1× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.065% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

45,49745,52445,510.56 August 2026 — 45,497 subscribers6 August 2026 — 45,506 subscribers7 August 2026 — 45,512 subscribers8 August 2026 — 45,524 subscribers9 August 2026 — 45,517 subscribers11 August 2026 — 45,518 subscribers12 August 2026 — 45,503 subscribers45,5036 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,493–45,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:0445,503-15
11 Aug 2026, 16:3145,518+1
9 Aug 2026, 17:2245,517-7
8 Aug 2026, 17:4445,524+12
7 Aug 2026, 17:2545,512+6
6 Aug 2026, 18:3145,506+9
6 Aug 2026, 03:3445,497first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
83.5%
avg views ÷ 45,503 subscribers
Avg views / post
38,000
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held30 (29 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total1,102,200
Reactions total29,234
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,970
Videos
280
Links
488

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

26,462 reactions across 26 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12,28646.4%
custom 53392650189469226493,72014.1%
custom 52425865248846720072,6249.92%
custom 54564335650278024542,2798.61%
🔥1,0503.97%
😍9863.73%
👻7502.83%
🥰6882.60%
💩4541.72%
🤡3281.24%
💯2520.952%
🙏2490.941%
❤‍🔥1650.624%
1360.514%
🐳870.329%
👏830.314%
💋550.208%
🫡490.185%
👎470.178%
🤪470.178%
7 further kinds1270.48%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
47
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 29 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
24
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zio402. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈16,700 views668 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

533custom 5242586524884672007101❤‍🔥28💔6

10 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC≈20,800 views830 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Кстати, о смешном. По сути, партию сняли руками её конкурентов, партии Родина. Ну щас то они точно выиграют. Че, блядь, за партия Родина? Партия Леонида Родина? Истец предъявлял за: -Скрытую интернет агитацию. С каких пор партии ЗАПРЕЩЕНО за себя агитировать вообще?))) У них прямое законное право есть на это, прописанное в ст. 62 и 68 закона о выборах Госдумы. Основная доебка типа в финансировании этой компании. О

650custom 5242586524884672007107custom 533926501894692264954💯19

10 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC≈21,400 views888 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

АХУЕТЬ, НЕ МОЖЕТ БЫТЬ! ОПЯТЬ!? Господ иноагентов вообще не волнует, что таким же образом слетел и Надеждин, который сейчас тоже иноагент, уехавший из РФ. А этой впопузиции поебать, они и в следующий раз найдут кого-то, втопят за него и уничтожат. Систему не победить системными методами, она не для этого создана. Максимум, что можно сделать, это отрастить у гидры ещё несколько голов, чтобы не одна она принимала реш

🥰688custom 533926501894692264911853🤡29

9 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC≈22,400 views815 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ещё один пример человеческой тупости, но уже в вопросах воспитания ребенка. Тупая сука на мамке говорит "Эти растения делают больно", показывая куда-то в их сторону, где много разных растений, минимум 5 видов. Откуда ребенок явно дошкольного возраста может понять о чем ты говоришь, просто взглянув на твою руку? Потом она напрямую ребенку говорит "Потрогай, если хочешь, потрогай" - дважды дав команду ребенку руками

599custom 5339265018946922649124custom 545643356502780245470🔥22

9 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈31,000 views1,001 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сделал для вас единственный смешной мем про стульчик, который не является простой переделкой западных мемов

802custom 5456433565027802454146custom 533926501894692264937custom 524258652488467200716

7 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈31,500 views1,169 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

908custom 5456433565027802454216🤔36🕊9

7 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC≈32,700 views1,291 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Целевая

custom 54564335650278024541,070custom 5242586524884672007108custom 53392650189469226498033

6 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC≈34,700 views774 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Если предлагать что-то от себя, то реалистичная схема это снижение у ЕДРА число мандатов ниже 300 суммарно по партийным спискам и одномандатным округам. Тогда они перестанут одной фракцией обеспечивать 2/3 голосов в думе. Сейчас они могут сами принимать или блокировать законы, а если не доберут 300 голосов - придется вспомнить о мнениях других партий. По федеральному списку - голосовать за партию, у которой есть реа

569custom 5339265018946922649160custom 524258652488467200732🔥13

6 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈35,000 views1,673 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Потешно наблюдать за потугами демшизового лагеря на выборах. Они всегда выбирают САМЫЙ бесперспективный вариант из всех возможных и пытаются топить за него до последнего. Будто специально, выставляя оппозицию дебилами. Конкретно, я про призывы голосовать за Яблоко. Это единственная легальная партия, кто пукает про МИ ПРОТИВ ВАЙНЫ, при этом без четкого плана, а лишь "НЕМЕДЛЕННО ПРЕКРАТИТЬ ОГОНЬ И ЗАМОРОЗИТЬ ВОЙНУ!!!"

custom 53392650189469226491,020527👏83custom 524258652488467200743

6 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC≈39,300 views1,760 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

custom 52425865248846720071,420custom 5456433565027802454260❤‍🔥69🎄11

5 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈32,700 views1,272 reactions24 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я нарисовал

😍986150custom 5456433565027802454114❤‍🔥22

5 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈32,400 views527 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5339265018946922649318custom 545643356502780245413363🌭13

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @zio402. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 20,718 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 329,993
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 598,864
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Зио” (@zio402), 45,503 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zio402.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.