Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Инвестиции в плюс | IF+

Channel

Инвестиции в плюс | IF+

@plus_investfuture

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,611subscribers

-109 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001250120187
TypeChannel
Username@plus_investfuture
Created28 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/plus_investfuture

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 7 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@plus_investfuture/2491 · this entry23 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC@if_bonds/408724 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC1.0024 hours
@if_bonds/411410 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC@plus_investfuture/2492 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC1.0024 hours
@if_bonds/416731 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC@plus_investfuture/2494 · this entry1 Sept 2026, 15:04 UTC1.0024 hours
@if_bonds/41827 Sept 2026, 15:08 UTC@plus_investfuture/2495 · this entry8 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC1.0024 hours
@if_bonds/42625 Oct 2026, 15:01 UTC@plus_investfuture/2496 · this entry5 Oct 2026, 15:04 UTC1.003 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@if_bonds5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0024 hours@if_bonds (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 25 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 April 2026 to 5 October 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 7 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @plus_investfuture — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 7 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,6116,7226,666.57 August 2026 — 6,720 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,722 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,716 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,713 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,711 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,709 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,703 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,697 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,694 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,692 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,677 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,664 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,668 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,662 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,656 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,649 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,642 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,640 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,636 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,629 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,623 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,620 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,618 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,617 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,618 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,611 subscribers7 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net -109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,594–6,739 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 23:506,611-7
7 Nov 2026, 00:266,618+1
4 Nov 2026, 05:396,617-1
1 Nov 2026, 05:276,618-2
29 Oct 2026, 03:596,620-3
26 Oct 2026, 09:456,623-6
23 Oct 2026, 05:566,629-7
19 Oct 2026, 22:186,636-4
16 Oct 2026, 15:106,640-2
13 Oct 2026, 07:096,642-7
6 Oct 2026, 20:216,649-7
29 Sept 2026, 14:396,656-6
19 Sept 2026, 05:016,662-6
14 Sept 2026, 16:016,668+4
11 Sept 2026, 04:596,664-13
5 Sept 2026, 21:206,677-15
1 Sept 2026, 20:456,692-2
29 Aug 2026, 15:086,694-3
26 Aug 2026, 15:066,697-6
23 Aug 2026, 16:586,703first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2248.9%
🔥1328.9%
👍715.6%
🙏12.22%
🤔12.22%
🤝12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Oct 2026, 15:04 UTC616 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

💱 Что такое квазивалютные облигации и зачем они сейчас При ослаблении рубля инвесторы ищут способы защитить свой капитал. Одно из возможных решений - квазивалютные облигации. Давайте вместе разберем, что это за инструмент и как его использовать в текущих условиях. ❓ Как это устроено Квазивалютные облигации - это бумаги, у которых номинал и купон привязаны к иностранной валюте, а расчеты проходят в рублях. Например, …

8 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC908 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🧐 Как инвестору определить свой риск-профиль? Казалось бы, простой вопрос: Боитесь просадок — значит стоит рассмотреть консервативные портфели. Готовы рискнуть ради большей доходности — агрессивные портфели. Но давайте усложним задачу: ➡️ Первый инвестор спокойно смотрит на падение портфеля на 20–30%. Паниковать и продавать всё не собирается. Только вот деньги ему понадобятся уже через год — например, на первоначал…

1 Sept 2026, 15:04 UTC899 views1 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🎒 Сколько на самом деле стоит школа - считаем честно Конец августа — время, когда семейный бюджет проверяется на прочность. Давайте вместе разберем, из чего складываются расходы и почему разовые сборы — это далеко не вся сумма. ❓ Что говорит статистика? По данным АКРА, собранным на основе Росстата, в июне 2026 года школьный набор, в среднем по стране, стоил 17 000 ₽ для мальчика и 19 000 ₽ для девочки. В школьный …

❤1

20 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC969 views1 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

💰 Сколько нужно для пассивного дохода 100 000 ₽ в месяц? Вопрос, на который почти никто не может ответить с ходу. Обычно называют цифру наугад — и она либо пугает, либо оказывается сильно заниженной. А считается это просто. Разберем логику. 🧮 Базовая формула Чтобы получить расчет капитала, делим годовой доход на ожидаемую доходность портфеля. - 100 000 ₽ в месяц — это 1 200 000 ₽ в год. - При доходности 12%: 1 200 …

❤1

11 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🏦 Что происходит с вашим вкладом через год Сценарий, знакомый многим: в прошлом году вы открыли вклад под хорошую ставку. Год прошёл, вклад закрывается и вы планируете его пролонгировать - а условия уже заметно хуже. Это не случайность, а устройство инструмента. ➡️ Вклад — это короткая фиксация Ставка держится ровно до конца срока. И банк не гарантирует, что при следующем оформлении вы получите такие же условия. Ве…

23 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,140 views1 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

💡 Запускаем «Летнюю перезагрузку инвестора» Есть закономерность, которую мы видим постоянно — в том числе по разборам сотен портфелей подписчиков. Портфель может быть собран грамотно, а результата всё равно нет. Причина почти всегда не в бумагах, а этажом ниже: в отсутствии личной финансовой системы. 🔹 Человек держит правильные бумаги — и продаёт их в худший момент, потому что срочно понадобились деньги. 🔹 Инвести…

🤔1

20 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC964 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📈 Три базовых курса инвестора — что изучать в первую очередь Короткий тест на одну минуту. Ниже — три фразы, каждая из которых описывает этап пути инвестора. Выберите ту, что звучит ближе всего к вашей ситуации — и откройте доступ к материалам именно вашей ступени. ➡️ «Деньги как-то расходятся, откладывать не получается» Ваша ступень — «Управление личными финансами» Внутри: - Куда реально уходит доход - Как сформи…

🔥3👍1

17 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC860 views1 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

💸 Считаем вместе: сколько стоит ошибка инвестора? Представим двух инвесторов - оба одновременно купили одинаковые бумаги на одну и ту же сумму. Через три года их результаты отличаются в 1,5 - 2 раза. Разница — в решениях, которые были приняты в моменты колебания рынка. Сейчас падение рынка продолжается уже пять месяцев подряд — такое сейчас происходит впервые с 2014 года. И в такие периоды включается механизм, кото…

❤1

7 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC973 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📊 Тест: ваш уровень в личных финансах и инвестициях? Большинство инвесторов оценивают свою финансовую грамотность интуитивно — «вроде разбираюсь». Но между «вроде» и реальным пониманием того, как работает сложный процент, чем отличается ЛДВ от обычного налогового вычета или почему решение ЦБ по ключевой ставке двигает весь рынок — обычно есть заметный разрыв. Мы собрали 36 вопросов, которые проверяют этот разрыв на…

❤2

29 Jun 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,060 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📉 280 млрд рублей сняли с депозитов за Май. Куда они пошли? Рекордный отток с вкладов зафиксирован в Мае 2026 — и вот две основные причины: 1️⃣ Деньги понадобились на текущие расходы и повседневные нужды. Например, на бензин или оплату детского лагеря для детей. 2️⃣ Люди опасаются доверять свои деньги банкам на фоне снижающихся ставок и общей неопределённости. Сняли — и держат наличными. Но наличные тают от инфляци…

❤2🙏1

22 Jun 2026, 15:02 UTC997 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📊 Рынок падает 15 недель подряд - что делать инвестору? Индекс Мосбиржи закрыл 15-ю неделю снижения подряд — абсолютный антирекорд. На прошлой неделе открылись на 2 528, закрылись на 2 421. В пятницу в моменте рынок опускался до 2 401 пункта — минимума с декабря 2024 года. Одна из причин — снижение ключевой ставки всего на 0,25% — до 14,25%. Тогда как рынок закладывал более решительный шаг. Пока рынок акций шторми…

❤3

19 Jun 2026, 15:03 UTC897 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

💸 Вы теряете 40% потенциальной доходности каждые 3 года — и вот почему: Все слышали про силу сложного процента. Но мало кто считал, что происходит, когда к нему добавляются регулярные ребалансировки профессиональных аналитиков. Мы посчитали реальные цифры на исторических данных портфеля «Экстремал» от команды IF+. Исходные данные: 100 000 ₽, горизонт — 3 года Портфель «Экстремал» — стратегия «купи и держи» с фокусо…

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @plus_investfuture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IF Travel
@without_borders_ru · 32,015
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
Кира Юхтенко
@kira_pronira · 65,444
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 August 2026
Деньги из бетона — Недвижимость РФ
@if_estate · 64,527
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
IF Bonds — Облигации РФ
@if_bonds · 95,231
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
IF Crypto
@if_crypto_ru · 52,868
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
InvestFuture
@investfuture · 183,330
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
IF Stocks
@if_stocks · 119,338
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
IF News
@if_market_news · 119,683
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Инвестиции в плюс | IF+” (@plus_investfuture), 6,611 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plus_investfuture.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.