Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Влад, где иксы?

@The10xHunt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

784subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001328366192
TypeChannel
Username@The10xHunt
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/The10xHunt

Growth

7847867856 Aug 2026, 01:36 — 786 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 15:34 — 786 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:04 — 784 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 01:367 Aug 2026, 01:04
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 784–786 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:04784-2
6 Aug 2026, 15:34786no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:36786first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.9%
avg views ÷ 784 subscribers
Avg views / post
266
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (17 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total4,523
Reactions total170
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

170 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8550.0%
😁4224.7%
🔥127.06%
🤝116.47%
👀95.29%
🤯63.53%
🐳21.18%
🗿21.18%
👎10.588%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC158 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Серебро сжимается после обвала почти вдвое. Цена несколько недель держится в диапазоне $56-61, а полосы Боллинджера заметно сузились. Технически вероятность резкого движения растёт. Сейчас $XAGUSD находится выше средней линии и тестирует верхнюю границу диапазона. Краткосрочно перевес у покупателей, но среднесрочная нисходящая структура ещё не сломана. Для меня это сигнал скорого роста волатильности, но направлени

👍8🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC153 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Прочитанное за июль. Книги дают возможность познакомиться с лучшими мыслями лучших людей, когда-либо живших на планете, но вместо этого я читаю додо книги, потому что их привезли бесплатно.

😁8🔥3👎1

3 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC158 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На самом деле в крипте сейчас почти мёртвая тишина: и на графиках, и в крипточатах. Причин много, в том числе циклическая криптозима, переток интереса и капитала в сферу AI и так далее. А теперь к этому добавились ещё и взломы холодных кошельков. Но главная причина, на мой взгляд, - события 10 октября 2025 года, когда обнулили огромное количество тех, кто сидел в альтах с плечом, а спотовые держатели получили огром

👍6🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 03:46 UTC238 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мне только что сообщили, что моим подписчикам в личку пишут мошенники от моего имени. Рассказывают про какую-то «раздачу» на бирже. Скопировали мою аватарку и имя, а юзернейм сделали похожим на мой. Рассчитывают на ваше доверие ко мне. Поэтому сразу пишу сюда: это не я. Никакой раздачи и промокода нет. Не переходите по их ссылкам и ничего им не переводите. Отправите деньги - потеряете их. Если вам написали, блокиру

👍8🤝3

28 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC290 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Потратив шесть лет и $60 млрд на формирование позиции, которую, по его словам, он никогда не продаст, Сейлор оказался в убытке на 20% и начал продавать. Вот это кино. Люди, которые еще год назад буквально боготворили Сейлора, теперь все чаще хейтят его и смеются над ним. Это один из лучших контртрендовых индикаторов того, что дно уже близко.

👍9🤝2

28 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC289 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На самом деле это, конечно, какой-то треш. Аккаунты с моделями онлифанс на аватарках пишут комментарии, чтобы рекламировать мошеннические каналы о «трейдинге». И самое страшное, что раз они делают это систематически, значит, это работает: люди переходят по ссылкам, подписываются на эти каналы и т.д и т.д. 🤦‍♂️

🤯6👍5

28 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC269 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кто говорил, что в трейдинге нет красивых девушек? Вы только посмотрите на комментарии под постами CryptoQuant.

😁8👍2

23 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC393 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

$SPCX: IPO по $135, пик $225,64, сейчас около $113. От максимума -50%. На мой взгляд, ажиотаж во многом создали искусственно: агрессивный маркетинг, очередь на IPO и менее 5% акций во фрифлоате. После старта торгов розница продолжила покупать на хайпе, обеспечивая выход участникам размещения и ранним инвесторам. 6 августа из-под локапа могут выйти до 911,5 млн акций. Главная проверка спроса ещё впереди. SpaceX, вер

👍9👀3

23 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC361 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В первом полугодии 2026 года CertiK подтвердил 52 нападения на владельцев криптовалют - на 33% больше, чем год назад. 39 случаев произошли в Европе, из них 33 - во Франции. Общая сумма зафиксированных потерь и требований выкупа выросла с $10,5 млн до $124,1 млн. Преступники используют информацию из блокчейна, утечек и соцсетей, чтобы вычислить владельца кошелька, его адрес и близких. Затем нападают на него или члено

🤝5👍4

21 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC406 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Шутки шутками, а теперь ловите аналитику по IMOEX ($IRUS). Часть 1/2 От минимума 1898 пунктов IMOEX отскочил на 9,5% и вернулся к 2079. Но с начала года индекс все еще теряет 24,9%, а индекс полной доходности - 19,1%. Пока рынок отыграл только часть предыдущего падения. Ставка остается на уровне 14,25%, доходность десятилетних ОФЗ - около 16,4%, а прибыль компаний за январь-апрель снизилась на 10,3% год к году. Кр

👍9👀2🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC306 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

За последние 60 дней кошельки с балансом от 1 000 до 10 000 BTC в чистом выражении накопили 66 700 BTC. За тот же период общий объем $BTC на кошельках с балансом от 100 до 1 000 BTC сократился на 77 800 BTC. Думаю, если ориентироваться на привычные циклы, мы уже ближе к завершению медвежки. Поэтому ничего необычного здесь нет: средние держатели сокращают балансы, а крупные киты постепенно накапливают биткойн. Обычн

👍7🐳2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @The10xHunt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTCFinal Results45 voters

BTC до октября 2026:

  1. Вниз 👇64%
  2. Вверх 👆36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 187,127 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Влад, где иксы?” (@The10xHunt), 784 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The10xHunt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.