Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cipher Crypto Trader

@CipherCryptoTrader

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

149,403subscribers

-2,096 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001936417230
TypeChannel
Username@CipherCryptoTrader
Description🚀 Trading: FX | Crypto 💰 $BTC $ETH $XAU ⚠️ Disclaimer: NFA, DYOR
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CipherCryptoTrader

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

149,403151,499150,4517 August 2026 — 151,499 subscribers7 August 2026 — 151,499 subscribers8 August 2026 — 151,018 subscribers9 August 2026 — 150,541 subscribers10 August 2026 — 150,274 subscribers11 August 2026 — 149,805 subscribers12 August 2026 — 149,403 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -2,096. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 149,089–151,813 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:23149,403-402
11 Aug 2026, 09:33149,805-469
10 Aug 2026, 12:10150,274-267
9 Aug 2026, 12:42150,541-477
8 Aug 2026, 12:06151,018-481
7 Aug 2026, 12:45151,499no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:33151,499first reading

Engagement

84 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.069%
avg views ÷ 149,403 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
84
of 84 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 65 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held84 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total6,697
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
344
Videos
14
Links
281

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 42 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1917.0%
1715.2%
😍1614.3%
🎉1513.4%
❤‍🔥1412.5%
😇119.82%
🥰119.82%
💯98.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Here's proof of a 50 Tether withdrawal by bypassing the bot 😍😍 Friends, be sure to message me before you deposit so I can test the bot before you want to deposit. If there's no problem, I'll tell you to deposit. My ID @supcrts Friends, be sure to deposit via my link so that you are insured, and if something happens to your capital, I can compensate you. Bot link https://t.me/USDTDOPLEXTBOT?start=6189005754 Friends

12 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC31 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @CipherTAPhoto

A full list of the most important tools to make serious money in crypto

1❤‍🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC118 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Retail investors are rushing back into gold: The largest US physical-gold backed ETF, $GLD, attracted +$50 million in retail inflows on Wednesday, the largest daily inflow since March. This was also twice the previous largest daily inflow recorded since early April. Overall, $GLD attracted +$637 million in inflows on Wednesday, the largest daily inflow since June 18th. Subsequently, the fund posted +$77 million a

💯1

12 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC86 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$AKE ACCUMULATED 30 BILLION TOKENS ON FRESH WALLETS! 10x Pump coming! #NFA #DYOR

12 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTCviews —

Cipher Crypto Trader pinned «If you want to promote your channel or group and attract active users for free, this is a great bot. https://t.me/gram_piarbot?start=1906858549»

12 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026

If you want to promote your channel or group and attract active users for free, this is a great bot. https://t.me/gram_piarbot?start=1906858549

12 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC73 viewsread 12 August 2026

#GoldTrading — Ideas for trading gold 📊 Chart: https://s3.tradingview.com/snapshots/l/LMQhybmz.png

11 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC1 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://t.me/GARAMexTONx2DUOBLERbot?start=6189005754 https://t.me/CryptoTasksHubUSDTAIRDROPbot?start=6189005754 https://t.me/CryptoTasksHubBNBAIRDROPbot?start=6189005754

11 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTCviews —

Cipher Crypto Trader pinned «https://t.me/GARAMexTONx2DUOBLERbot?start=6189005754 https://t.me/CryptoTasksHubUSDTAIRDROPbot?start=6189005754 https://t.me/CryptoTasksHubBNBAIRDROPbot?start=6189005754»

11 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC155 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#BTC Hope this demand defend bullish market structure

🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @CipherCryptoTrader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 221,769 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cipher Crypto Trader” (@CipherCryptoTrader), 149,403 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CipherCryptoTrader.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.