Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

territory of eternal rest

@specterreads

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

290subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002338217876
TypeChannel
Username@specterreads
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/specterreads

Growth

2907 Aug 2026, 16:14 — 290 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:17 — 290 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:148 Aug 2026, 08:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 289–291 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:17290no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:14290first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.6%
avg views ÷ 290 subscribers
Avg views / post
77.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 July 2026
Posts held19 (7 November 202514 July 2026)
Views total77
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
31
Videos
1
Links
158

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤯480.0%
🔥120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2025 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC77 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @wublockchainenglish

Just In: Coinbase Opens Registration to Users in China On July 14, multiple social media users reported that Coinbase had opened account registration to users in China. Wu Blockchain confirmed the change with Coinbase staff, who said users can now complete verification using a Chinese national ID and a mainland China address. Previously, the process required a Chinese passport and a Hong Kong address. — link

18 Jun 2026, 03:29 UTC235 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/nicoypei/status/2067377658984284264?s=46&t=EXohe__01k7uhuzDrskGcw asian brokerages becoming front ends for hyperliquid is huge also belated happy $hype ath to all those who celebrate hyperliquid

🔥1

7 Apr 2026, 12:21 UTC384 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ahboyashreadsPhoto

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/116363336033995961

10 Feb 2026, 09:03 UTC541 viewsread 8 August 2026

good read on the recent market shenanigans & liquidation mechanisms of hyperliquid link hyperliquid

7 Jan 2026, 14:00 UTC478 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @iansintel

FIREBLOCKS ACQUIRES CRYPTO ACCOUNTING PLATFORM TRES FINANCE FOR $130 MILLION: FORTUNE SOURCE

27 Dec 2025, 10:30 UTC510 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @wublockchainenglish

Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz warned that XRP and Cardano (ADA) risk losing relevance if they fail to demonstrate real-world utility, arguing the crypto market is shifting from “narrative-driven tokens” to “business-driven tokens” with measurable value and profits. He expects a 1–3 year structural transformation, during which wallets and exchanges may evolve into neobank-like platforms. — link

22 Dec 2025, 13:33 UTC482 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @iansintel

JPMORGAN EXPLORING CRYPTO TRADING FOR INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS SOURCE

19 Dec 2025, 09:25 UTC470 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @wublockchainenglish

Bybit reentered the U.K. after a two-year exit, resuming spot trading on 100 crypto pairs under a framework that complies with FCA financial promotion rules. Bybit will operate and provide marketing of its services under the auspices of London-based crypto exchange Archax. — link

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @specterreads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“territory of eternal rest” (@specterreads), 290 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/specterreads.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.