Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Привет, эстет!

Channel

Привет, эстет!

@helloesthete

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,389subscribers

-143 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001630928336
TypeChannel
Username@helloesthete
DescriptionБлог Натальи Гольцевой о «витаминах счастья»: красота, искусство, косметика, мода, еда, ЗОЖ, юмор, музыка, кино, книги, путешествия, уютный дом и ещё тысячи других удовольствий Реклама: @NatashaVanlav
Created12 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/helloesthete

Growth

28,38928,53228,460.56 August 2026 — 28,532 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,532 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,530 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,519 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,505 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,499 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,486 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,471 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,449 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,436 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,422 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,408 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,389 subscribers6 August 202618 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 12 days, net -143. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,368–28,553 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 13:4228,389-19
17 Aug 2026, 12:1328,408-14
16 Aug 2026, 03:4728,422-14
14 Aug 2026, 13:2528,436-13
13 Aug 2026, 04:2528,449-22
12 Aug 2026, 03:4228,471-15
11 Aug 2026, 01:0828,486-13
10 Aug 2026, 01:4128,499-6
9 Aug 2026, 01:2128,505-14
8 Aug 2026, 02:4328,519-11
7 Aug 2026, 00:4228,530-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:0128,532no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5928,532first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.48%
avg views ÷ 28,389 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held48 (5 August 202618 August 2026)
Views total60,980
Reactions total4,587
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 02:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14,600
Videos
5,690
Links
6,530

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
21m 12s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,587 reactions across 48 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,33929.2%
1,26827.6%
😁53211.6%
👍2896.30%
👏2806.10%
😍2104.58%
1503.27%
🥰1413.07%
💔911.98%
❤‍🔥881.92%
💯771.68%
🙏410.894%
👌210.458%
🤩160.349%
😘120.262%
🤗100.218%
🍾70.153%
🏆70.153%
💋50.109%
20.044%
1 further kind10.022%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,587reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 48 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @helloesthete. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC645 views23 reactionsread 19 August 2026
File

#музыка Привет, эстет! в Max ⬅️

14👍4🥰4🙏1

18 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC655 views59 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

Я не знаю иных признакoв превoсходства, кроме доброты © Людвиг ван Бетховен Привет, эстет! в Max ⬅️

44😍8💯7

18 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈1,070 views58 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

В соцсетях вирусится новый Романтический тренд Нужно открыть архив NASA и найти в нём фотографию космоса, которую космическое агентство опубликовало в день вашей первой встречи с любимым. В архиве APOD можно найти снимок на любую дату, начиная с июня 1995 года. Наша с мужем дата 27.01.2007 и снимок называется «Замок и небо» Комментарии к фото: В то время, когда комета Макнота правила южным небом, соединением Лун

🔥42👏9🥰3😍3🤩1

18 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈1,270 views82 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

Беременная подруга на днях спросила: «У тебя есть идеи красивых и необычных женских имен?» Если не считать имен моих дочек — Кира и Мия, которые мне, безусловно, нравятся, я смогла придумать только Лея, Мира и Рада И вот новые идеи подъехали. Ещё необычнее сложно придумать. А у вас есть идеи красивых и необычных женских имен, эстеты? Привет, эстет! в Max ⬅️

😁4024👍12👌6

18 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC≈1,350 views130 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

Меня попросили вам передать. Доброе утро, эстеты! Привет, эстет! в Max ⬅️

89🥰28😘8💯4❤‍🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC≈1,530 views180 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

Минутка арт- и смехотерапии 2-в-1 Привет, эстет! в Max ⬅️

😁132👏25👍105🤩5🍾3

17 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,480 views163 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

И зашлифуем новость свежей съемкой Джорджины Роналду для испанского Harper’s Bazaar. Красотка! Джорджину, кстати, адски хейтят в соцсетях по поводу ее фигуры. Якобы она «слишком толстая». И мне очень понравилось то, как она ответила на это всем и сразу: Мое тело изменилось, как меняется тело каждой женщины. И я надеюсь, что я буду продолжать меняться еще много лет, потому что это будет означать, что я продолжаю жит

106🔥40🙏12❤‍🔥5

17 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC≈1,410 views120 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Тем временем, разрушив все предсказания о роскошной «свадьбе года», бесконечно длинном списке звездных гостей, а также дате и месте проведения церемонии Криштиану Роналду и Джорджина Родригес поженились В качестве даты пара выбрала символичный для них день — 11 августа. Именно в этот день ровно 10 лет назад произошла их первая встреча и любовь с первого взгляда в магазине Gucci на улице Серрано в Мадриде, где 22-ле

🔥6634👍18💘1😁1

17 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,000 views75 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Идеальная иллюстрация того, как я себя ощущаю, когда прохожу 10 000 шагов, прыгаю 200 раз на скакалке, проплываю 1,5 км. в бассейне или делаю мощную силовую тренировку, после которой спускаюсь с 3 этажа спортзала на дрожащих ногах и по стеночке. У вас так же, эстеты? Привет, эстет! в Max ⬅️

😁51🔥15💯63

17 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC679 views41 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

В январе такой картины в зале не увидишь. Все начинают новую жизнь с нового года, но потом что-то идёт не так… А тем временем прошло уже 229 из 365 дней года. 62% года позади. Осталось всего 38%. Так что если у вас были большие цели на этот год, и они выполнены менее, чем на 62%, самое время поднапрячься! Я, кстати, попробовала попрыгать на скакалке в зале. Там тоже «правильное» мягкое покрытие, так что самое оно.

👍23🔥116👏1

17 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC905 views131 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Доброе утро, эстеты! Начинаем неделю с улыбкой и шокирующе красиво! Привет, эстет! в Max ⬅️

😁88🔥24🥰7👏64👍2

14 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,720 views152 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Кстати, обещала вам рассказать про свои первые впечатления от скакалки. Они такие: 1. Это сложно! Очень! Нагрузка в разы выше, чем во время бега. Дыхалка отказывается продолжать эту жесть уже через пару минут 2. Это непривычно и необычно. Я буквально физически ощущаю, как у меня в головном мозге создаются новые нейронные связи 3. Это приятно. Не знаю, как и чем это объяснить… может, какими-то детскими воспоминания

🔥90👍4010👏101❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @helloesthete. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 196,568 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Нескучный ВЕЛНЕС
@happywellness · 79,498
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
Любовник Голубев
@lovergolubev · 114,913
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Привет, эстет!” (@helloesthete), 28,389 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helloesthete.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.