Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,858–1,911 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 21:18
1,864
-6
11 Sept 2026, 20:17
1,870
-4
7 Sept 2026, 10:40
1,874
-2
2 Sept 2026, 10:33
1,876
-6
30 Aug 2026, 14:46
1,882
-3
27 Aug 2026, 16:04
1,885
-1
24 Aug 2026, 07:08
1,886
-6
20 Aug 2026, 20:23
1,892
-3
17 Aug 2026, 16:46
1,895
-2
14 Aug 2026, 13:06
1,897
-5
11 Aug 2026, 04:27
1,902
-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:32
1,905
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:21
1,905
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 4 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
406 reactions across 7 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
187
46.1%
🤣
44
10.8%
🔥
30
7.39%
❤🔥
25
6.16%
🥰
18
4.43%
😁
17
4.19%
🙏
17
4.19%
😍
16
3.94%
💔
12
2.96%
🕊
12
2.96%
🎄
11
2.71%
🤩
11
2.71%
👍
4
0.985%
🎉
2
0.493%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 406 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 21 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 7 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @beru_ne_glyadya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 September 2025 to 21 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Максимально выпала не только с канала, но и из общения, новогодней суеты и любой социальной жизни помимо работы.
Но буквально неделю назад случилось маленькое предновогоднее чудо, о котором я не имею права промолчать.
У одной прекрасной девушки Нади из Петербурга (по совместительству потрясающего фотографа) на странице в запрещённой сети я увидела воротнички. Стала её расспрашивать, где же она такую красоту взяла, ок…
Готовить сани летом, а телегу зимой - позиция, которую я тут всегда пропагандирую.
Загляните по следам черной пятницы в Todizain, вдруг именно ваши размерчики остались.
Мерино vs Кашемир
Давайте разберём поподробнее главных соперников зимнего сезоне, что лучше - мериносовая шерсть или кашемир?
Раунд 1. Мягкость.
Кашемир нежный как мамины объятия. Представьте, что вас обнимает ангел. Надевая изделия из кашемира, вы испытаете тактильное наслаждение, ведь он комфортен в носке даже для самой чувствительной кожи.
Шерсть мериноса, безусловно, тоже мягкая и приятная к телу, но ощущается …
А можно, чтобы шерсть с кашемиром не за 20-30 тысяч рублей?
Конечно можно, если готова внимательно покопаться в составах.
Да даже если не готова, лови небольшую подборку с Lamoda.
Uset
Maison David
Nominee
Sela
Vitacci
Cashenelle
Берём не глядя и носим не снимая.
Ох, как же я по вам соскучилась.
Дорогие подписчики и люди, желающие купить мой канал, канал не продается, просто админ сейчас находится а активной фазе запуска проекта, который пока его кормит.
Надеюсь, что мы скоро запустимся и жизнь потечет в привычном русле.
И мы с вами снова будем хихикать над мемами и выбирать новые платья.
Обнимаю вас!
Ваша Анна.
Трендовые цвета осени 2025
Палитра этой осени заиграла сложными цветами, а мы такое любим.
С нами остались любимчики лета в виде сливочного масла и бордо, но если они уже приелись, предлагаю добавить новых красок.
1. Серо-голубой поможет создать яркие контрасты с темной базой (все утро пытаюсь разглядеть тут голубой). Советую обратить внимание на аксессуары в этом цвете. Например, добавить голубые перчатки к коричн…
❤24❤🔥13🙏9
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @beru_ne_glyadya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Готовьте кошельки @koshelky · 27,146 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
Унесённые дизайном @interior_aesthetics · 26,618 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
Кремом по лицу @kremom_po_litsu · 21,229 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
Сорокалетние подростки @krupchat · 21,018 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
Словарный жопас @nasty_notes · 23,116 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Сначала крем, потом поем @snachalakrem · 21,840 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 September 2026
Привет, эстет! @helloesthete · 28,090 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Лобстеры на завтрак @lobsternazavtrak · 22,534 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Беру не глядя” (@beru_ne_glyadya), 1,864 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beru_ne_glyadya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
