Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vanity case

Channel

Vanity case

@vanity_case

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,011subscribers

-134 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725984255
TypeChannel
Username@vanity_case
DescriptionКабинет желаний #третьегоадмина под грифом "Хотеть не вредно". Связь @NatashaArkh Регистрация в реестре Роскомнадзора https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673f13509d804a279bd077d6&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created9 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vanity_case

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,93013,14513,037.513,0116 August 202610 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net -134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,898–13,177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 20:2713,011+81
9 Nov 2026, 03:2012,930-6
7 Nov 2026, 20:5912,936-3
6 Nov 2026, 15:5412,939-4
5 Nov 2026, 14:3512,943-5
4 Nov 2026, 17:1412,948-6
3 Nov 2026, 14:4012,954-8
2 Nov 2026, 15:5912,962-1
1 Nov 2026, 17:3712,963-2
31 Oct 2026, 16:1712,965+1
30 Oct 2026, 16:5912,964-2
29 Oct 2026, 13:5712,966-3
28 Oct 2026, 09:5812,969-2
27 Oct 2026, 11:2512,971-4
26 Oct 2026, 08:2912,975-9
25 Oct 2026, 11:2812,984-2
24 Oct 2026, 08:5512,986+2
23 Oct 2026, 09:2912,984+1
22 Oct 2026, 10:5612,983-5
20 Oct 2026, 03:3912,988first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 13,011 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,600
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held58 (30 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total28,854
Reactions total519
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 08:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,610
Videos
≈292
Links
≈1,410

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
21s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,835 reactions across 55 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,08359.0%
🔥73940.3%
🤔130.708%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,944 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 11:55 UTC954 views50 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

А смотрите, какой браслет в Letters and Stones мы построили. "Кофейная палочка" из розового золота с пятнами из горячей эмалью и каплей-подвесом - коричневым бриллиантом💋️️️️️️

❤32🔥18

10 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,180 views22 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Давно писала тут об этих ультратонких часах Чайкина, и по-прежнему это одни из самых красивых часов, что я видела. Посылаю во вселенную запрос поработать с Константином, у меня уже года три лежит очень забавная и виральная часовая задумка. https://t.me/theosdnew/11435

❤12🔥10

9 Nov 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,520 views25 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#хотелкадня приятно видеть запечатленные символы глобализации – с надеждой, что они вновь станут нашим будущим, а не уйдут в архив. В этот раз над Rimowa виртуозно поработал апологет современного искусства, бельгиец Wim Delvoye.

🔥22❤3

7 Nov 2026, 19:55 UTC≈1,210 views40 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @sncmagPhoto

Раньше #третийадмин стеснялся своей черной книжки. А когда «Правила жизни» сделали эту футболку, смирился. Другой Наташи для вас нет, вы и эту-то не заслужили!

❤27🔥13

6 Nov 2026, 10:12 UTC≈1,980 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Совет дня: обновите свое мобильное приложение Lamoda. Я это сделала, и обнаружила классную новую фичу – виртуальный гардероб. Теперь из верха, низа, обуви можно составить готовый лук, да еще и снабдить его аксессуарами и прочими #партнерскимихотелками. Сразу слышу одобрительный голос моей практичной мамы, которая с юности призывала мне одежду готовыми луками покупать, а не как я делаю – эффектный верх, который ни с ч…

❤13

6 Nov 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,840 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Что-то есть особенно злодейское, дикое и даже варварское в этом бесстыдном, ярчайшего цвета норковом свитере Louis Vuitton. На Авито нашла кардиган (это именно кардиган, а не бомбер) из этой коллекции 2021 года и понеслась душа по рисейлу.

🔥20❤12

5 Nov 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,780 views34 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#хотелкадня упущена брутальная винтажная туфелька, она же складной нож, предположительно созданная заключенными в СССР вручную. Плексиглас и металл, была представлена в out_of. Ну какая сексуальная вещь! Ссылка на запретграм.

❤34

3 Nov 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,960 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Какие ваши планы на путешествия? Я вот во что бы тот ни стало собираюсь посетить два новых музея - тот, что открылся в Каире у пирамид и музей Гуггенхайма в Абу-Даби, который вот-вот откроется. Это - мой любимый вид поездок, наполненный не только гедонистическими удовольствиями, но и культурой, и смыслом. Хотите извлекать из культурных мероприятий все - записывайтесь на новый (уже 23-й!) поток курса “Как стать искус…

❤14

3 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,800 views22 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Полагаю, базированный в Лондоне и шьющий на заказ из винтажных шелка и норки дизайнер Виктор Гичев ответственен за остромодность силуэта opera coat. Отделанное искусственным мехом кимоно State Venice было моментально распродано, теперь ждем богатое "Манто Пуаре" от Say no more - предзаказ.

❤21🤔1

3 Nov 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,640 views29 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#хотелкадня хрустальная челка с показа LV SS27 – отличное решение для тех, кто хочет экспериментов без посещения стилистов по волосам и неудачных стрижек, а еще это очень красиво. Футуристический аксессуар пока в статусе подиумного и без объявленной стоимости, но надеюсь, добраться до него все же удастся.

🔥20❤9

2 Nov 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,810 views25 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Разные очень эффектные камни появились у Letters and Stones. Фантазийные огранки и интересные цвета. А кто там хотел «Плохую девочку» с квадратным природным изумрудом?

🔥22❤3

30 Oct 2026, 13:54 UTC≈1,580 views18 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

#хотелкадня старинные китайские мотивы и переработанный пластик – пример современной эклектики в дизайне. История бренда Rumba Bor началась со старой формы для литья, которая не была в эксплуатации много лет. Результатом работы стали модные полихромные красавчики, будто специально созданные для небольших европейских улиц или наших с вами террас. Цены начинаются от 157 евро за штуку.

🔥18

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @vanity_case. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Globe Trotter
@Gtrotter · 20,788
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 September 2026
Tetyamotya
@tetyamotya · 44,334
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Георгиева Снежанна
@marvelous2309 · 38,012
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Jewellery Digest
@jeweldigest · 21,422
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
Доктор Щербатова
@JuliaSherbatova · 39,424
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Bon Mot
@lebonmot · 36,862
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Ксения Соловьёва
@ksenia_solovieva · 51,776
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
YUNA / Юния Пугачева
@yunapugacheva · 28,157
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Olga Karput 🥬
@okarput · 31,073
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
Безфильтров
@bezfiltrov_show · 28,831
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Бьютимаргиналия
@beautymarginalia · 42,286
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
ТАБОР
@ta_bor · 19,698
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 October 2026
FASHION PAPER | Журнал
@fashionpaper · 51,870
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Запишите меня
@doctor_lekomtseva · 30,380
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vanity case” (@vanity_case), 13,011 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vanity_case.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.