Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Улица Шкловского - Астрономия и Космонавтика

Channel

Улица Шкловского - Астрономия и Космонавтика

@ShklovskyStr

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,219subscribers

+330 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001475949710
TypeChannel
Username@ShklovskyStr
DescriptionДля связи: @Shklovsky YouTube: https://youtube.com/@shklovsky Мы на Boosty: https://boosty.to/shklovsky Мы на sponsr: https://sponsr.ru/shklovsky РКН: https://clck.ru/3KD6UQ
Created21 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ShklovskyStr

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,88919,22719,0586 August 2026 — 18,889 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,896 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,898 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,894 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,889 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,896 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,906 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,908 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,911 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,915 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,908 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,910 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,917 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,932 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,928 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,936 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,947 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,946 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,960 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,955 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,949 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,952 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,957 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,972 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,021 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,040 subscribers6 September 2026 — 19,067 subscribers9 September 2026 — 19,070 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,086 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,082 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,085 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,088 subscribers27 September 2026 — 19,116 subscribers4 October 2026 — 19,120 subscribers9 October 2026 — 19,134 subscribers13 October 2026 — 19,147 subscribers14 October 2026 — 19,152 subscribers15 October 2026 — 19,154 subscribers16 October 2026 — 19,178 subscribers17 October 2026 — 19,192 subscribers19 October 2026 — 19,200 subscribers21 October 2026 — 19,192 subscribers22 October 2026 — 19,202 subscribers23 October 2026 — 19,206 subscribers24 October 2026 — 19,212 subscribers25 October 2026 — 19,213 subscribers26 October 2026 — 19,221 subscribers27 October 2026 — 19,218 subscribers29 October 2026 — 19,224 subscribers31 October 2026 — 19,222 subscribers31 October 2026 — 19,218 subscribers2 November 2026 — 19,220 subscribers4 November 2026 — 19,221 subscribers4 November 2026 — 19,226 subscribers5 November 2026 — 19,219 subscribers7 November 2026 — 19,227 subscribers8 November 2026 — 19,220 subscribers9 November 2026 — 19,219 subscribers19,2196 August 20269 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 95 days, net +330. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,838–19,278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 09:4819,219-1
8 Nov 2026, 01:2719,220-7
7 Nov 2026, 00:3519,227+8
5 Nov 2026, 22:2619,219-7
4 Nov 2026, 23:2919,226+5
4 Nov 2026, 01:5019,221+1
2 Nov 2026, 23:1819,220+2
31 Oct 2026, 23:0819,218-4
31 Oct 2026, 02:0119,222-2
29 Oct 2026, 00:0019,224+6
27 Oct 2026, 22:1919,218-3
26 Oct 2026, 21:3919,221+8
25 Oct 2026, 22:0919,213+1
24 Oct 2026, 21:0619,212+6
23 Oct 2026, 17:4019,206+4
22 Oct 2026, 15:1919,202+10
21 Oct 2026, 06:0819,192-8
19 Oct 2026, 02:1819,200+8
17 Oct 2026, 23:1719,192+14
16 Oct 2026, 19:5719,178first reading

Engagement

91 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.2%
avg views ÷ 19,219 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,070
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 91 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held91 (31 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total134,320
Reactions total5,523
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 03:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,080
Videos
≈242
Links
≈600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 34s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

16,054 reactions across 90 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6,63441.3%
👍5,35333.3%
❤1,4208.85%
❤‍🔥5363.34%
🥰2941.83%
🤣2631.64%
🤔2101.31%
👀2091.30%
👾1941.21%
😢1681.05%
💩1140.71%
🫡920.573%
😍670.417%
😱650.405%
👏480.299%
💘460.287%
😁360.224%
😭270.168%
🤮220.137%
🍓210.131%
34 further kinds2351.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,054 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
37
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 90 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ShklovskyStr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 91 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (6.06%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,740 views96 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

NGC 2170 - эмиссионная и отражательная туманность в созвездии Единорог. Она расположена примерно в 2700 световых годах от нас. Это довольно молодая область звездообразования возрастом 6-10 миллионов лет, богатая межзвёздной пылью и газом. Прим этом NGC 2170 - довольно тусклый и не самый простой для наблюдений объект. Michael Haller

🔥59👍20💘5❤4❤‍🔥3🥰2👀1👾1

10 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC≈2,350 views115 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍71🔥34❤‍🔥3🥰3❤2👾2

9 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC≈2,720 views139 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

NGC 1333 - одна из ближайших к нам активных областей звездообразования. Эта отражательная туманность находится в созвездии Персей, примерно в 1000 световых годах от нас, на окраине огромного комплекса молекулярных облаков. Голубоватое свечение туманности создаёт свет молодых звёзд, рассеивающийся на окружающей их межзвёздной пыли. Но тёмные пылевые полосы скрывают большую часть процессов, происходящих внутри облака.…

👍75🔥46❤‍🔥9❤3🥰3👾2💘1

9 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC≈3,010 views172 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍97🔥47😱11✍4❤‍🔥3👀3🥰3❤2

7 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC≈3,190 views155 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @spacex_rus

Posted without readable text

👍84🔥46❤12🤔6👾3😁2💩1🤮1

6 Nov 2026, 06:02 UTC≈8,150 views163 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Европейский космический аппарат Hera получил первый детальный снимок двойной системы астероидов Дидим и Диморф. На изображении, сделанном с расстояния 60 километров, хорошо виден крупный астероид Дидим диаметром около 780 метров. Его спутник Диморф диаметром 151 метр почти полностью скрыт в тени. Снимок показывает сторону Дидима, которую ранее не удавалось рассмотреть. Столкновение аппарата DART с Диморфом 26 сентяб…

🔥100👍34👏12❤‍🔥8❤3👾2🥰2👀1

5 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC≈5,030 views355 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Что не так с этой ракетой...

🤣251👀26🍓19🌭15🔥11😁10🍌9🌚5

5 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC≈4,530 views147 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @artemismoon

Posted without readable text

🔥84👍40👾7❤4👀3🤡3❤‍🔥2👌1

5 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC≈3,720 views171 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍94🔥44👀14❤10🥰4💘2❤‍🔥1👾1

4 Nov 2026, 08:46 UTC≈3,970 views217 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

А вот и анимированная иллюстрация для нового видео. (В комментарии закину исходник из статьи) Да, я затянул с роликом, но тема оказалась для меня сложнее, чем я рассчитывал. И это при том, что объекты, о которых пойдёт речь, многие наверняка сочтут астрономической попсой. Более того, не исключаю, что мне всё-таки не удалось передать что-то совершенно точно. Хотя, справедливости ради, я вообще не видел научно-популярн…

👍107🔥69👀15👏9❤4💩3🥰3❤‍🔥2

4 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC≈4,600 views178 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍91🔥56❤17🥰4❤‍🔥3👀2👾2💩2

3 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC≈4,090 views163 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Мне всегда хотелось увидеть, как на астрономических снимках выглядят искусственные звёзды, которые создают лазерные системы адаптивной оптики. Оказывается, вот так. Это искусственные звёзды, создаваемые лазерами телескопов VLT. Они помогают компенсировать искажения света, вызванные земной атмосферой. Каждый луч запускается с одного из четырёх телескопов VLT. На высоте около 90 километров лазер достигает слоя атмосфе…

🔥101👍34👀10❤7❤‍🔥3🥰3👾2💩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @ShklovskyStr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Космос просто
@cosmosprosto · 62,401
#1
Astro Channel
@astro_channel · 10,031
#2
НАУЧ ПОП
@sergei_nauchpop · 4,984
#3
James Webb Space Telescope
@JamesWebbTelescope · 11,602
#4
Kosmo
@kosmo_off · 90,238
#5
astronomy
@tirsky · 8,394
#6
Space Room 🎥 Видео
@spaceroom_video · 2,015
#7
sergei_popov_astro
@popov_astro · 2,063
#8
Space Room | Космос
@inSpaceRoom · 10,917
#9
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин
@nezemnoy_telegram · 96,819
#10
DS ASTRO🌚
@dsastro2 · 3,904
#11
Вселенная Плюс
@vselennayaplus · 83,665
#12
AstroAlert | Наблюдательная астрономия
@astroalert · 46,736
#13
Физика от Побединского
@physfrompobed · 27,278
#14
Макар Светлый
@makarsvet13 · 3,849
#15
Zelenyikot и космос
@egorovkot · 17,937
#16
Открытый космос
@ourspacelive · 3,756
#17
Лаборатория Научных Видео
@ScienceVideoLab · 5,597
#18
QWERTY
@qwerty_live · 21,514
#19
SciTopus – Наука и научпоп
@SciTopus · 9,971
#20
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 490,249
#21
НаукаPRO
@naukaproo · 9,235
#22
Записки астронома
@astrozapiski · 3,478
#23
Дух антрополога
@anthrospirit · 3,381
#24
Мемы мирового правительства • Джо Чиз
@jocheez · 1,029
#25
Rings & Moons
@RingsandMoons · 5,760
#26
Пушка | Передний край науки и технологий
@sci_one_tv · 15,971
#27
InGenium
@In_6enium · 1,084
#28
Futurecollector.com | Коллекционер будущего
@futurecollector · 1,312
#29
Химия – Просто
@ChemistryEasy · 24,889
#30
N + 1
@nplusone · 65,475
#31
Рафаэль и Ко.
@raffeisTG · 995
#32
Медицина просто | Эндоскопист Илья Квашенов
@kvashenov · 2,135
#33
Zanuda
@zanudascience · 1,940
#34
Артемида - лунная программа
@artemismoon · 2,934
#35
addmeto
@addmeto · 72,001
#36
Верхом на звезде
@riding_a_star · 957
#37
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,780
#38
Наука, идеи, открытия. Интеллектуальный канал.
@samintell · 2,431
#39
НАУКА ВСЕГДА КСТАТИ
@myatom_world · 2,937
#40
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 140,753
#41
От приматов до автоматов
@otprimatovdoavtomatov · 861
#42
Биологово
@biologovo · 2,101
#43
Центр Архэ
@arhecenter · 4,172
#44
Бочарик (ага, тот самый)
@botcharov · 209,248
#45
Астроверты
@astroverty · 4,464
#46
ТОПЛЕС
@toplesofficial · 498,473
#47
Быть Или
@ToBeOr_Official · 304,333
#48
Хабр
@habr_com · 134,497
#49
Любопытный Иван
@curious_ivan · 2,215
#50
Onigiri
@onigiriScience · 13,404
#51
Смотровая Военврача
@dr_voenvrach · 45,377
#52
На Zzzzzападном фронте без перемен
@ve4niyvoy · 112,484
#53
Алан Грант - наука с публицистикой 🚩25+
@alangrant · 3,148
#54
GEO
@GEOSHOW · 77,425
#55
Naked Science
@nsmag · 245,244
#56
Alpha Centauri | Космос
@alphacentaurichannel · 34,327
#57
Pro Космос | Космонавтика и астрофизика
@realprocosmos · 5,410
#58
PRO Hi-Tech
@prohitec · 69,598
#59
Курилка Гутенберга | Наука в лекциях
@kurilka_gutenberga · 4,716
#60
Леонид Еленин | Писатель и астроном
@leonideleninofficial · 4,494
#61
ПостНаука
@postnauka · 22,286
#62
Neural Shit
@NeuralShit · 54,643
#63
Злой Крастер
@angrycrust · 122,966
#64
Fun Science
@funscience · 34,192
#65
Тележенька с костями
@telegasbones · 6,968
#66
Техасский Вестник
@starbasepost · 19,255
#67
АНТРОПОГЕНЕЗ.RU
@antropogenez_ru · 36,580
#68
Двач
@dvachannel · 969,331
#69
Александр Панчин
@ScienceInquisition · 49,147
#70
Землякова
@ozeml · 1,203
#71
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 605,041
#72
Картавый продюсер / Иван Кобзарев
@producerpodcastov · 3,467
#73
Ivan Lutz
@IvanLutz · 1,024
#74
Utopia Show
@topapopa · 369,995
#75
Осьмиарх Эльманн Павел II
@airshipsterpublic · 1,017
#76
Научпопки
@scipopus · 1,347
#77
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 525,130
#78
Vert Dider
@vertdider · 27,113
#79
Thoisoi
@TheThoisoi · 45,049
#80
Студия «Дилетанты»
@diletantes · 934
#81
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 299,577
#82
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 368,836
#83
Летопись космической эры
@zheleznyakov_spaceera · 8,130
#84
Proshloe – исторический журнал
@proshloejournal · 5,121
#85
Redroom Text
@redroomtext · 75,870
#86
Илья Яшин
@yashin_russia · 133,380
#87
Клим Жуков
@klimzhukoff · 137,670
#88
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,654
#89
СМТ — Научный подход | Борис Цацулин
@cmtscience · 8,604
#90
SpaceX
@spacex_rus · 17,178
#91
Накипело. Майкл Наки
@Nackepelo · 215,193
#92
АРХИВАРИУС
@loonydrom · 6,926
#93
sndk
@sndkgram · 357,747
#94
ЗаТелеком 🌐
@zatelecom · 64,510
#95
nerds
@nerds · 410,643
#96
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,206
#97
RocketMan
@RocketMan_kosmodrom · 13,315
#98
ИА Панорама
@ia_panorama · 76,084
#99

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Космос просто
@cosmosprosto · 62,401
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Kosmo
@kosmo_off · 90,238
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
Илон Маск | Физика | Астрономия
@IlonMaskRus · 20,224
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 28 September 2026
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин
@nezemnoy_telegram · 96,819
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
NASA | Физика | Астрономия
@kosmos149 · 86,358
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
Физика от Побединского
@physfrompobed · 27,278
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
AstroAlert | Наблюдательная астрономия
@astroalert · 46,736
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Мир Космоса
@kosmos_go · 36,646
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
Вселенная Плюс
@vselennayaplus · 83,665
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Химия – Просто
@ChemistryEasy · 24,889
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
QWERTY
@qwerty_live · 21,514
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
#энерголикбез
@operby · 35,892
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Thoisoi
@TheThoisoi · 45,049
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
ПостНаука
@postnauka · 22,286
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day
@apod_telegram · 35,572
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Грег
@gregjgeek · 23,057
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
Olegmks
@oleg_mks · 23,613
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
АНТРОПОГЕНЕЗ.RU
@antropogenez_ru · 36,580
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Артифекс | История и искусство
@artifex · 19,696
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 September 2026
Vert Dider
@vertdider · 27,113
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
Филолог всея Руси
@filologofrus · 42,915
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 September 2026
Fun Science
@funscience · 34,192
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Александр Панчин
@ScienceInquisition · 49,147
Telegram ranks this channel #97 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Улица Шкловского - Астрономия и Космонавтика” (@ShklovskyStr), 19,219 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShklovskyStr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.