Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Химия – Просто

Channel

Химия – Просто

@ChemistryEasy

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,167subscribers

+813 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001062851458
TypeChannel
Username@ChemistryEasy
DescriptionХимия • Мемы • Опыты • Загадки • ЕГЭ • Студенты 👨‍🔬 Всё, что ты боялся спросить у препода — но можно тут 🤣 Смешно, полезно и по делу YouTube: https:// www.youtube.com/c/ChemistryEasy
Created13 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ChemistryEasy

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24,32825,49224,9105 August 2026 — 24,354 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,354 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,355 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,350 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,341 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,338 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,343 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,346 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,347 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,353 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,341 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,345 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,340 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,336 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,337 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,335 subscribers21 August 2026 — 24,328 subscribers23 August 2026 — 24,412 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,439 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,501 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,503 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,776 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,013 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,492 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,474 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,447 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,433 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,422 subscribers5 September 2026 — 25,420 subscribers8 September 2026 — 25,297 subscribers11 September 2026 — 25,155 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,153 subscribers14 September 2026 — 25,133 subscribers16 September 2026 — 25,125 subscribers19 September 2026 — 25,134 subscribers25 September 2026 — 25,167 subscribers25,1675 August 202625 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 50 days, net +813. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,153–25,667 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 06:1825,167+33
19 Sept 2026, 00:5825,134+9
16 Sept 2026, 19:2125,125-8
14 Sept 2026, 23:0225,133-20
13 Sept 2026, 08:5825,153-2
11 Sept 2026, 09:5925,155-142
8 Sept 2026, 17:5625,297-123
5 Sept 2026, 11:1725,420-2
3 Sept 2026, 12:3925,422-11
2 Sept 2026, 04:5325,433-14
1 Sept 2026, 05:1625,447-27
31 Aug 2026, 02:4425,474-18
30 Aug 2026, 02:2725,492+479
28 Aug 2026, 23:3725,013+237
27 Aug 2026, 22:2824,776+273
26 Aug 2026, 20:4524,503+2
25 Aug 2026, 22:1324,501+62
24 Aug 2026, 19:5624,439+27
23 Aug 2026, 07:5824,412+84
21 Aug 2026, 19:0524,328first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.64%
avg views ÷ 25,167 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,670
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held63 (30 July 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total25,055
Reactions total645
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 23:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,370
Videos
≈659
Links
≈743

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
23m 31s
Average length
1m 18s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,906 reactions across 62 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,26443.5%
🔥54518.8%
👍37612.9%
🤣2528.67%
❤‍🔥1143.92%
👌893.06%
🎉602.06%
😭371.27%
🤨351.20%
🎄321.10%
💘180.619%
🤪140.482%
🍌130.447%
😎90.31%
👏70.241%
🙈70.241%
👎60.206%
😍60.206%
🤔50.172%
😱40.138%
6 further kinds130.447%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,938 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 63 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ChemistryEasy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC705 views32 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

В предыдущих частях данной статьи мы познакомились с вами что такое фосфоресцентные пигменты, а также синтезировали один из них - активированный сульфид цинка. Сегодня мы продолжим данный разговор и попробуем синтезировать что-нибудь посложнее. Подробнее читайте в нашей статье #Sobiratel_sxem@ChemistryEasy

🔥20❤8👍2💘2

27 Sept 2026, 12:16 UTC950 views23 reactionsread 27 September 2026

КАК АНОДИРОВАТЬ ТИТАН? https://youtube.com/shorts/6uchyES5uUw?feature=share

❤16👍6😱1

26 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,320 views32 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Ещё немного белого фосфора вам в ленту... #Sobiratel_sxem@ChemistryEasy

❤24👍7🎄1

25 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,600 views25 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Поиграем в угадайку? Как думаете соль какого металла использовалась для окраски пламени этилового спирта? #Sobiratel_sxem@ChemistryEasy

❤20🔥3🤔2

25 Sept 2026, 12:57 UTC≈1,590 views90 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Ну что, добьем до 1 млн к понедельнику?

❤65🎉16🔥5👍3❤‍🔥1

25 Sept 2026, 07:25 UTC≈1,670 views38 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @csffestPhoto

«Токсично: химический true crime» — научно-популярная лекция Александра Иванова на «ФАНК: Норильск» 👩‍🔬 Катастрофы редко начинаются со взрыва или аварии. Чаще — с маленькой ошибки, проигнорированного предупреждения или ложного ощущения безопасности. На лекции разберём реальные техногенные катастрофы XX и XXI века как криминальные дела. Восстановим цепочку событий, найдём химического «убийцу» и попробуем понять, где…

❤21🎉8👍5🔥2🎄1💘1

24 Sept 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,730 views34 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Из лаборатории в аптечку: путь лекарственного препарата @podcast_mephi За привычной упаковкой лекарства стоят годы исследований, испытаний и сложных производственных процессов. Почему из тысяч перспективных молекул до пациента доходят лишь единицы? Что мешает перенести производство одного и того же препарата на другой завод? И как изменилась фармацевтика со времён первых антибиотиков? В новом выпуске вместе с Алло…

❤23👍7🔥3💘1

24 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,680 views36 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

А сегодня мы продолжим разговор о фосфоресцентных пигментах и попробуем что-нибудь синтезировать самостоятельно. Подробнее читайте в нашей статье #Sobiratel_sxem@ChemistryEasy

❤24👍6🔥4🎄2

23 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC≈2,100 views50 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

На фото и видео показано окисление и хемилюминесценция белого фосфора... #Sobiratel_sxem@ChemistryEasy

❤32👍11🔥5😎2

22 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC≈2,100 views34 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

А сегодня мы поговорим с вами об одном из изотопов калия - калии-40! Подробнее читайте в нашей статье #Sobiratel_sxem@ChemistryEasy

🔥21❤9👍4

22 Sept 2026, 13:31 UTC≈2,000 views39 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥26❤5🤯3🤣2😭2👎1

22 Sept 2026, 08:10 UTC≈2,070 views57 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥40❤9🤣8

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @ChemistryEasy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Thoisoi
@TheThoisoi · 45,321
#1
📮 Наука – Просто
@scienceeasyru · 2,030
#2
НаукаPRO
@naukaproo · 9,212
#3
Конспекты | Биология и Химия
@konspekty_ege · 93,288
#4
InGenium
@In_6enium · 1,088
#5
Химия в России и за рубежом (канал ИОНХ РАН)
@chemrussia · 8,893
#6
chemistryatrium
@atrium_olympiads · 1
#7
Химический факультет МГУ
@chemistryofmsu · 8,606
#8
Химия с Тим | Конспекты
@repetitor_shpory · 16,887
#9
Любопытный Иван
@curious_ivan · 2,254
#10
Олимпиадная химия | Аллес
@chem_olimp_alles · 7,201
#11
Химические беруши
@chemberushi · 1,826
#12
Химия в бутылочке⚗️
@ychemistry · 12,896
#13
Лаборатория Научных Видео
@ScienceVideoLab · 5,568
#14
Екатерина Строганова | Химия ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор
@chemist_msu · 89,417
#15
Базированная химия
@baze_chemistry · 660
#16
НВ пишет
@mnv_msu · 2,073
#17
Fun Science
@funscience · 34,428
#18
Ученые Бëруши 🤓
@science_berushi · 3,966
#19
Пушка | Передний край науки и технологий
@sci_one_tv · 15,945
#20
Sci_Career
@sci_career · 30,304
#21
Юлиан Рыжов | Химия NeoFamily | ЕГЭ 2027
@chemfamily · 27,701
#22
🧪 Химия и Биология 🫀
@biologiyaendkimya · 5,487
#23
Химический портал Аллес
@chem_alles · 4,787
#24
Органика с нуля до ЕГЭ | Химия, 10 класс | Степенин и Дацук
@stepenin10 · 8,978
#25
Виртуальный музей химии
@chemmuseum · 2,090
#26
новосад ин шуга ленд
@novosad_chem · 388
#27
Вселенная Плюс
@vselennayaplus · 83,091
#28
Московская олимпиадная химия
@moschemolymp · 3,970
#29
Химия ЕГЭ 2027 | Тася Фламель
@chemflamel · 4,683
#30
Химия
@vhz_31 · 2,600
#31
ЕГЭ с Химическим котом | Степенин и Дацук | Химия 2027
@chem4you_ege · 17,069
#32
Наука СИБУРа
@naukasibur · 11,557
#33
Космос просто
@cosmosprosto · 60,877
#34
DS ASTRO🌚
@dsastro2 · 3,916
#35
Улица Шкловского - Астрономия и Космонавтика
@ShklovskyStr · 19,116
#36
Физика от Побединского
@physfrompobed · 25,906
#37
Макар Светлый
@makarsvet13 · 3,818
#38
Space Room | Космос
@inSpaceRoom · 10,857
#39
Дух антрополога
@anthrospirit · 3,367
#40
Научпопки
@scipopus · 1,348
#41
НАУКА ВСЕГДА КСТАТИ
@myatom_world · 2,941
#42
Мемы мирового правительства • Джо Чиз
@jocheez · 1,033
#43
SciTopus – Наука и научпоп
@SciTopus · 10,022
#44
Медицина просто | Эндоскопист Илья Квашенов
@kvashenov · 2,151
#45
Осьмиарх Эльманн Павел II
@airshipsterpublic · 1,027
#46
СМТ — Научный подход | Борис Цацулин
@cmtscience · 8,668
#47
Студия «Дилетанты»
@diletantes · 937
#48
Тележенька с костями
@telegasbones · 6,924
#49
От приматов до автоматов
@otprimatovdoavtomatov · 867
#50
Биологово
@biologovo · 2,091
#51
АНТРОПОГЕНЕЗ.RU
@antropogenez_ru · 36,383
#52
Злой Крастер
@angrycrust · 123,839
#53
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 493,692
#54
Astro Channel
@astro_channel · 9,924
#55
Utopia Show
@topapopa · 368,504
#56
Zanuda
@zanudascience · 1,945
#57
Рафаэль и Ко.
@raffeisTG · 994
#58
АРХИВАРИУС
@loonydrom · 7,001
#59
Как это сделано | How it`s made
@kaketosdelano · 4,448
#60
Александр Панчин
@ScienceInquisition · 49,376
#61
Vert Dider
@vertdider · 26,961
#62
Центр Архэ
@arhecenter · 4,095
#63
ПостНаука
@postnauka · 21,797
#64
ВСЕРОСНУТЫЕ
@vserosnutye · 19,464
#65
AlexGyver 🛠 Channel
@alexgyvershow · 78,178
#66
Labrats
@rlabrats · 16,835
#67
Space Room 🎥 Видео
@spaceroom_video · 2,014
#68
Курилка Гутенберга | Наука в лекциях
@kurilka_gutenberga · 4,741
#69
QWERTY
@qwerty_live · 21,603
#70
РХТУ | Менделеевский Университет
@muctr_official · 9,072
#71
Химики
@chemistrytg2021 · 32,020
#72
astronomy
@tirsky · 8,408
#73
Репич
@repich_tg · 7,107
#74
Алан Грант - наука с публицистикой 🚩25+
@alangrant · 3,223
#75
Hakerishka
@hakerishkaa · 956
#76
Onigiri
@onigiriScience · 13,479
#77
Смотровая Военврача
@dr_voenvrach · 44,504
#78
Proshloe – исторический журнал
@proshloejournal · 5,133
#79
Игорь Негода
@igornegodastartuem · 38,904
#80
Российский Союз Химиков
@ruschemunion · 3,395
#81
НАУЧ ПОП
@sergei_nauchpop · 4,986
#82
Sci_world
@science_fear · 9,930
#83
Академический эколог 🚀
@academeco · 3,277
#84
PCR.NEWS
@pcr_news · 12,940
#85
Зоопарк из слоновой кости
@ivoryzoo · 31,620
#86
Вопросы по неорганике
@voprosiponeorganike · 912 (as read 14 September 2026)
#87
Мемы, музыка, природоведение
@murex77 · 7,945
#88
Ivan Lutz
@IvanLutz · 960
#89
Землякова
@ozeml · 1,207
#90
Futurecollector.com | Коллекционер будущего
@futurecollector · 1,321
#91
Открытый космос
@ourspacelive · 3,807
#92
Elon Musk | Илон Маск
@elonmusksu · 7,874
#93
Всё как у зверей / радио Тимонова
@timonova · 20,427
#94

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Thoisoi
@TheThoisoi · 45,321
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Химики
@chemistrytg2021 · 32,020
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
Наука
@naukatv_ru · 23,591
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Физика от Побединского
@physfrompobed · 25,906
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Конспекты | Биология и Химия
@konspekty_ege · 93,288
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
#энерголикбез
@operby · 35,750
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Космос просто
@cosmosprosto · 60,877
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Vert Dider
@vertdider · 26,961
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
ПостНаука
@postnauka · 21,797
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Химия – Просто” (@ChemistryEasy), 25,167 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChemistryEasy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.