Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дух антрополога

Channel

Дух антрополога

@anthrospirit

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,356subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001409755948
TypeChannel
Username@anthrospirit
Created3 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anthrospirit

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,3563,3743,3656 August 2026 — 3,366 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,366 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,367 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,365 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,366 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,362 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,363 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,372 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,368 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,371 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,374 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,370 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,360 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,362 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,356 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,353–3,377 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 08:423,356-6
13 Sept 2026, 07:373,362+2
9 Sept 2026, 12:573,360-10
4 Sept 2026, 08:163,370-4
31 Aug 2026, 11:353,374+3
28 Aug 2026, 08:233,371+3
25 Aug 2026, 05:053,368-4
21 Aug 2026, 18:463,372+9
18 Aug 2026, 19:563,363+1
16 Aug 2026, 01:473,362-4
12 Aug 2026, 03:173,366+1
9 Aug 2026, 07:113,365-2
6 Aug 2026, 12:103,367+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:463,366no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:513,366first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

140 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6647.1%
😁3525.0%
🔥1410.0%
👍139.29%
🐳75.00%
custom 523546682202260688821.43%
10.714%
❤‍🔥10.714%
🤮10.714%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC336 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ivan_semyan

Электронная версия моей статьи «Одиссея: потускневшая бронза», опубликованной в журнале «Вокруг света» накануне выхода фильма Кристофера Нолана. В обозримом будущем по приглашению Ютуб канала, посвященного кино дам интервью о впечатлениях уже после просмотра картины. https://www.vokrugsveta.ru/history/potusknevshaya-bronza-chto-ne-tak-s-odisseei-kristofera-nolana-s-istoricheskoi-tochki-zreniya-id7172407/

5🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC343 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кстати, про историческую составляющую «Одиссеи» можно почитать тут, у Ивана Семьяна:

👍3

28 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTC530 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я тут с дружеской и коллеговской (или коллегиальной?) рекомендацией лекции Александра Соколова. Офлайн я их пока смотреть не могу, а тут как раз онлайн! Так что присоединяйтесь, посмотрим вместе. Ещё и тема одна из моих любимых — «Не могли! Вымышленные и реальные возможности древних людей. Версия 3.0» (без шуток, я обожаю истории про то, что древние не могли обработать камень или красиво положить их в геометрическую

🔥103👍1

26 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC592 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если у вас упала самооценка, вы всегда можете посмотреть отзывы на достопримечательности. Раз уж у Арарата есть отзывы с одной звездой, то чего нам переживать 😄

😁352🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC509 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что-то совсем нет сил писать в канал, все силы съедает книга. Сегодня вот сходили на «Одиссею», и мне внезапно понравилось. Да, нет шлема из кабаньих клыков, да, доспехи Агамемнона, да, всех возмутил кастинг (меня он совершенно не бесил с самого начала, мне только Полифем не понравился, потому что в моё время циклопы были выше, а этот мелковат). Но фильм не об этом. И не про войну и подвиги как таковые, за что ему

29👍91🤮1

12 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC740 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Научного контента сегодня не будет, в Армении отмечают Вардавар! Этот праздник имеет древние корни и связан, по разным версиям, с киликийским вариантом культа богини Астхик (богини любви и красоты, в античное время стала ассоциироваться с Афродитой), или Анаит (богини-матери). Ещё есть версия происхождения праздника из хеттских культов воды. Сейчас народная этимология связывает Вардавар с розой («вард/վարդ»— «роза»

19🐳7custom 52354668220226068882❤‍🔥1

3 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC851 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cherni_rynokPhoto

Черный рынок возвращается! Охотники за новинками, собиратели редкостей, радуйтесь: 40+ независимых издательств снова соберутся вместе, чтобы встретиться со своими читателями на самом диком книжном фестивале! В этот раз тему Черного рынка — «Экономика каменного века» — мы позаимствовали у антрополога Маршалла Салинза, провокативно, но убедительно доказавшего, что палеолит был эпохой настоящей удовлетворенности жизнь

8

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @anthrospirit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

АНТРОПОГЕНЕЗ.RU
@antropogenez_ru · 36,383
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Fun Science
@funscience · 34,394
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Наука
@naukatv_ru · 23,557
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Dagon
@dagon_official · 25,781
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Химия – Просто
@ChemistryEasy · 25,134
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
Доктор Утин
@doctorutin · 24,543
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
Vert Dider
@vertdider · 26,948
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
Физика от Побединского
@physfrompobed · 25,937
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Александр Панчин
@ScienceInquisition · 49,363
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дух антрополога” (@anthrospirit), 3,356 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anthrospirit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.