Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AI Projects

Channel

AI Projects

@turboproject

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,887subscribers

+4,080 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001420733927
TypeChannel
Username@turboproject
DescriptionИскусственный интеллект. Управление проектами. Промптинг. Vibe coding
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/turboproject

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,80713,88711,8476 August 2026 — 9,807 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,807 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,834 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,898 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,983 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,075 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,097 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,110 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,125 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,137 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,146 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,166 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,194 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,238 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,265 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,285 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,294 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,302 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,313 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,327 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,351 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,388 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,457 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,586 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,668 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,801 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,862 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,915 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,330 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,708 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,944 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,427 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,518 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,606 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,667 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,709 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,739 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,761 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,807 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,862 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,890 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,955 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,040 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,066 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,091 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,167 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,370 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,415 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,526 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,564 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,605 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,659 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,729 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,764 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,784 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,813 subscribers8 November 2026 — 13,848 subscribers9 November 2026 — 13,887 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 96 days, net +4,080. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,195–14,499 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 17:3413,887+39
8 Nov 2026, 08:1013,848+35
6 Nov 2026, 23:5713,813+29
5 Nov 2026, 23:5013,784+20
5 Nov 2026, 01:2913,764+35
3 Nov 2026, 21:5413,729+70
3 Nov 2026, 00:2413,659+54
2 Nov 2026, 03:5013,605+41
1 Nov 2026, 06:5413,564+38
31 Oct 2026, 09:4513,526+111
30 Oct 2026, 06:3113,415+45
29 Oct 2026, 08:3913,370+203
28 Oct 2026, 04:3613,167+76
27 Oct 2026, 02:4713,091+25
26 Oct 2026, 03:5813,066+26
25 Oct 2026, 03:3113,040+85
24 Oct 2026, 06:5012,955+65
23 Oct 2026, 03:5712,890+28
22 Oct 2026, 03:3112,862+55
20 Oct 2026, 23:1012,807first reading

Engagement

214 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.2%
avg views ÷ 13,887 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,860
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 214 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held214 (2 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total357,390
Reactions total4,819
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 07:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,010
Videos
≈518
Links
≈2,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 37s
Average length
1m 36s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,985 reactions across 201 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,34821.4%
👍2,18219.9%
❤1,88017.1%
💯9538.68%
✍9268.43%
🏆6736.13%
🤯5344.86%
🤔4604.19%
👀2512.28%
👏1491.36%
🤗1381.26%
custom 54293915489890650041030.938%
custom 5276274869670002486820.746%
🤩750.683%
🎉480.437%
custom 5422468615758688406440.401%
custom 5440841102871517055410.373%
⚡400.364%
custom 5370689396276205290340.31%
🙏180.164%
2 further kinds60.055%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 214 of the 214 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 214 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @turboproject. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 214 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 22 of 61 posts held from the last 30 days (36.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 06:21 UTC≈1,890 views50 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Qwen запустил свой Max 4 в режиме preview в чате, а также улучшил режим агента в веб-версии до уровня разработки кода и документов. Напомню, что Qwen Max по факту является единственной бесплатной фронтирной моделью. Текущая версия Max определенно превосходит даже Fable в задачах научного исследования и ревью работы других агентов, поскольку Qwen Max явно оптимизировали именно под эти важные задачи для тяжелых LLM. …

🔥29🏆12❤8👍1

Signed Vladimir Ivanov

11 Nov 2026, 05:50 UTC≈2,100 views45 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Обновился очень важный бенч Remote Labor Index от авторитетной организации Center for AI Safety, который показывает, насколько ИИ готов заменить кожаных полностью, а также насколько прибыльна сама затея замещать людей на агентов. Индекс строится на замене ИИ фрилансеров, чтобы не учитывать фактор личного общения и обеспечить слепой тест. Заказчик должен решить, принимает ли работу от ИИ, не зная, ИИ это или фрилан…

custom 527627486967000248623🔥6custom 54293915489890650044✍3👀3🤯3❤2🤔1

Signed Vladimir Ivanov

11 Nov 2026, 05:17 UTC≈2,260 views52 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Gemini 4 Carbon начинает получать неожиданно высокие оценки в независимых бенчмарках. Вероятно, мы рано списывали Google в утиль. По эффективности фиксов самого сложного уровня фактически нет никакого смысла пользоваться Fable 5.2, так как Gemini 4 Carbon показывает в Bug Hunt практически равный рейтинг, причём не на максимальном уровне рассуждений. Carbon где-то в 4–5 раз дешевле Fable и быстрее на том же уровне. П…

🏆32👍11🔥6❤2🤗1

Signed Vladimir Ivanov

11 Nov 2026, 05:09 UTC≈2,410 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Банки, которые инвестировали в создание Claude, как Goldman Sachs и Morgan Stanley требуют от Дарио поднять стартовую цену IPO до $1,5 триллионов долларов, т.к. считают цену ниже неоправданным дисконтом. По данным банкиров инференс Anthropic уже прибыльный, стоимость обучения моделей растворится по мере увеличения клиентской базы. Фактически банкиры настаивают, что прогноз, что до 2030 года Anthropic заработает больш…

👀12👍10❤2

Signed Vladimir Ivanov

10 Nov 2026, 17:57 UTC≈3,890 views47 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Anthropic обновил мануал по промптингу в духе, что "нельзя быть чуть-чуть беременным", а нужно решать кто владелец кода человек или ИИ. Автоматика достижима, если вы как в фильме про Крестного отца скажите: "Я отрекаюсь от дел его [контроля моего за кодом]". На деле это прием профессионалам давно известен, у меня в GRACE так и написано. Это меняет кардинально поведение ИИ, если его приоритет работа агентами, а людей…

❤18👍18custom 54293915489890650045✍4🤔2

Signed Vladimir Ivanov

10 Nov 2026, 16:58 UTC≈5,090 views46 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Как я и предсказывал, Anthropic перед IPO ужесточает режим соблюдения санкций, чтобы не иметь проблем с SEC. 1. Запрещается пользоваться Claude на территории России даже американцам 2. Если даже американец работает в США, но по контракту с компанией из России ему запрещается пользоваться Claude 3. Если даже американец работает в США и в американской компании, но по цепочке собственников компания имеет связь с Россие…

❤14custom 537068939627620529011💯9👍5🤔4👀2custom 54293915489890650041

Signed Vladimir Ivanov

10 Nov 2026, 13:51 UTC≈4,210 views71 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

David Heinemeier Hansson считает формой психоза утверждение, что "ИИ - ещё один инструмент". Давид создатель Ruby on Rails — одного из самых влиятельных веб-фреймворков в истории. Он совладелец и CTO компании 37signals (Basecamp, Hey и др.). Как C-level менеджер и знаменитый технический эксперт он последовательно двигает концепт, что "ИИ - это мой новый персонал". Поэтому он отрицает идею, что "ИИ - это инструмент",…

💯31custom 542939154898906500419👍10👏5🤯3custom 54224686157586884062custom 54408411028715170551

Signed Vladimir Ivanov

10 Nov 2026, 13:16 UTC≈4,040 views30 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Anthropic объявил последнюю фазу IPO как roadshow, что обычно означает размещение на бирже в течении 2-4 недель. Начальная цена продаж акций - $1,4 триллионов долларов. Событие будет довольно важным для всей индустрии ИИ, т.к. часть инвесторов ждут именно его, если акции Anthropic начнут дорожать после IPO, то снова включится ажиотажный спрос на скупку долей в ИИ компаниях. Иными словами, тут вопрос не только про …

❤16👀8👍5🏆1

Signed Vladimir Ivanov

10 Nov 2026, 12:20 UTC≈4,040 views80 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚠️ Почему считать ИИ «лишь инструментом» — опасная глупость, и Эд Ньютон-Рекс предостерегает от этого. Эд — очень известный эксперт в генеративном ИИ и защитник прав авторов. В 2025 году он вошёл в список TIME 100 самых влиятельных людей в сфере ИИ в мире. Его сервис Jukedeck для генерации музыки купил ByteDance. Он руководит ассоциацией Fairly Trained по защите прав авторов от ИИ. Эд в аргументе о том, что ИИ — «ли…

👍33💯15🤔13❤8custom 54293915489890650044🤯3🔥2custom 54224686157586884062

Signed Vladimir Ivanov

10 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC≈4,650 views69 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Минцифры сообщила операторам ЦОДов, что может их отбирать во "временное управление" для ресурсов "белого списка". Это создает риск клиентам крупных ЦОДов, которые довольно очевидно начнут выводить из них свои приложения на малых хостеров, т.к. возникает риск парализации бизнеса. Я поэтому не рекомендую клиентам сейчас размещать ИИ инференс в крупных российских облаках, т.к. они находятся в повышенной зоне риска. Луч…

✍37custom 537068939627620529015🤩7👏3🤗3🤯2❤1🔥1

Signed Vladimir Ivanov

10 Nov 2026, 07:42 UTC≈4,380 views50 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Вышел новый Bug Hunt, конечно Fable 5.2 решил заметно больше задач, чем DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. Однако в среднем Fable примерно в .... 100 раз дороже DeepSeek и примерно в 2,5 раза медленнее как агент. Довольно очевидно, что это overkill как фиксер или даже worker agent. Как фиксер багов Fable скорее будет эффективен для очень старого хлама, который оброс техническим долгом по уши. Для новых ИИ-разработок, где всё прон…

💯27✍12❤9🔥1custom 54293915489890650041

Signed Vladimir Ivanov

10 Nov 2026, 03:22 UTC≈4,530 views41 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Появляются первые оценки по деньгам Fable 5.2. Как я и опасался, прирост IQ похоже сделан перерасходом токенов на CoT. Модель у SemiAnalysis получилась на 31% дороже, чем предыдущий Fable. Вероятно на 1/3 и медленней. Надо посмотреть еще что по деньгам и времени когда Bug Hunt обновится. Но это ожидаемо. Fable сделан для тех, кому бюджет на ИИ не проблема. Как минимум пока.

💯25🔥7❤5🤯4

Signed Vladimir Ivanov

Showing the 12 most recent of 214 posts we hold for @turboproject. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@turboproject edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 November 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTCAnonymous Poll1,140 voters approx.

Какое у вас отношение к HR персоналу, что вы встречали?

  1. Чаще полная некомпетентность HR в тех кого они нанимают35%
  2. Средняя компетентность HR26%
  3. Высокая компетентность HR5%
  4. Я ненавижу HR (отвратительное общение, бесполезность для бизнеса и т.п.)11%
  5. Я обожаю HR как элиту персонала2%
  6. Не определился21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Русские нейронные сети
@neyronnyeseti · 20,289
5 posts
⚠️ Общественный уполномоченный по защите семьи (ОУЗС)
@ouzs_ru · 77,073
5 posts
Невидимая битва. Сокрытая история цивилизации
@n_bitva · 204
4 posts
Нейрозавтрак
@neurobreakfast_ru · 6
4 posts
Fun Science
@funscience · 34,192
3 posts
Мастер AI coding
@master_g_p_t · 204
2 posts
Military hub | СВО, FPV, дроны, БПЛА
@mil_hub · 25,630
2 posts
Нерон
@neir_on · 985
2 posts
Сиволобов — здесь про ИИ и телеком
@sivolobov_here · 372
2 posts
Технозаметки Малышева
@tsingular · 13,281
2 posts
Самосознание ИИ 🔆 ПРОБУЖДЕНИЕ РАЗУМА🔆
@AwakeAI · 135
1 post
Бухгалтер Эстонии 📱
@BuhInfoEE · 48
1 post
ай google
@G00GLS · 2,008
1 post
Просто Harness
@HarnessLLM · 186
1 post
Роботы
@PO6OTbI · 3,401
1 post
ШЕКСПИР
@RastaPavel · 24,242
1 post
SiNED
@SiNED_i · 79
1 post
Разработчик БПЛА
@UAVDEV · 125,267
1 post
VP Cybersecurity Brief
@VPCBrief · 934
1 post
ВАЛЬКИРИЯ 🇷🇺
@ValkiriaRD · 39,346
1 post
Вайб-крафтинг
@VibeCrafting · 63
1 post
AI Код
@ai_code_blog · 165
1 post
Альдиев PRO
@aldiyev · 90
1 post
Смотри что нашел
@b1tw1se · 493
1 post
Бинтик и Байтик
@bintik_baitik · 32
1 post
IT Does Matter
@comol_it_does_matter · 4,840
1 post
Секреты DARPA и ЦРУ | DARPA&CIA
@darpaandcia · 16,530
1 post
Five in mind
@fiveinmind · 113
1 post
Доктор конь. Размышления.
@horsekognition · 25
1 post
Гиперкризис - практика и аналитика
@hypercrisis · 222
1 post
Ivan Abashkin blog
@ivan_abashkin · 221
1 post
Мысли
@mhysli · 1
1 post
ML&|Sec Feed
@mlsecfeed · 1,413
1 post
Народный Собор
@narodsobor · 114
1 post
На рубеже (Евгений Андрущенко)
@narubeze · 1,743
1 post
Валера Ковальский
@neuraldeep · 20,311
1 post
Olga_mojet | Sell Wise - мудрые продажи
@olgamojet · 69
1 post
оLоLэMошная
@ololemoshnaya · 5
1 post
Паша про БСП ИИ нетолько
@pasha_ai_dev_cast · 88
1 post
Пётр Лундстрем
@petrlundstrem · 23,549
1 post
AGI research&development
@polterageist_blog · 52
1 post
ПравоVed
@pravoved_116 · 458
1 post
Шевцов | AI, ML, LLM и прочий хайп
@shevtsov_dl · 142
1 post
Yandex лента
@yandexrussla · 6,332
1 post
ЗВОНАРЁВА. читает😉
@zvonareva1 · 127
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Лента AI новостей by KIRRO Digital
@lenta_AI · 176
16 posts
Секреты DARPA и ЦРУ | DARPA&CIA
@darpaandcia · 16,530
15 posts
⚠️ Общественный уполномоченный по защите семьи (ОУЗС)
@ouzs_ru · 77,073
5 posts
Искусственный интеллект. Новости и код.
@agregator_ai · 1,921
2 posts
Человек с телефоном 👨‍🎓+📱
@chel_smart_phone · 430
2 posts
банан.zip
@bananzip · 2,455
1 post
КиберВойна и мiрZ
@cyber_MipZ · 2,371
1 post
Как быть? Частное мнение
@kak_byt · 145
1 post
⚡️Лобушкин молнит
@lobushkinflash · 73,666
1 post
мамина настройка | mom and AI
@maminastroyka · 46
1 post
Meet Deadlines
@meetdeadlines · 477
1 post
Невидимая битва. Сокрытая история цивилизации
@n_bitva · 204
1 post
🕸Panopticon XXI: Post-democracy⛓‍💥⏳
@panopticon21 · 2,448
1 post
Андрей Корниенко. Про (аналитить) это
@proanalyse_it · 271
1 post
РИА КАТЮША
@riakatysha · 82,511
1 post
Управление собой и другими
@samuprav · 731
1 post
СЕРГЕЙ ДОЛЖНИКОВ
@sedo_channel · 6,885
1 post
Семёнов Daily (AI)
@semyonovdaily · 240
1 post
Шевцов | AI, ML, LLM и прочий хайп
@shevtsov_dl · 142
1 post
СВОБОДНОЕ ДЫХАНИЕ -- ☢ЯДрёна WatchЬ‼️
@shingarkin · 24,434
1 post
Тени Руси
@tenirusi · 24,847
1 post
Разработчик БПЛА
@UAVDEV · 125,267
1 post
Люди-люди... на блюде.
@xui_na_blude · 9
1 post
Кибербезопасность Z
@z_cybersec · 249
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

СберМобайл
@sbermobile_official · 23,623
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AI Projects” (@turboproject), 13,887 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/turboproject.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.