Channel
@yuanqubot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,197subscribers
-113 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001953487279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yuanqubot |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yuanqubot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 17,197 | -19 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 17,216 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 17,218 | -32 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 17,250 | -16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 17,266 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 17,279 | -18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 17,297 | -15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:10 | 17,312 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 17,310 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 17,310 | first reading |
162 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 162 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 162 (7 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,257 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 117 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 3 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 162 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 162 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#阳光集团：2年累计投入百万美元打造新闻媒体行业巨头 😀😃😃😃😃😃 大咖 @daka ✅ 🔥TG无处不在|无孔不入的【爆料联盟】 🔥持续打造1千个全局搜索【引流频道】 1️⃣阳光新闻 @yangguang 全面型新闻曝光频道，全网最新最快最全行业资讯，寻人|互助|曝光|悬赏|反诈|揭秘|一条龙服务 2️⃣柬中时报 @cctimes 柬埔寨最具影响力和公信力的华人新闻媒体。 3️⃣华人大事件 @dashijian 巨资打造 正版大事件品牌，其他大事件均为假冒！ 服务于行业高端人群，专注于重大新闻和突发事件发布，揭秘各大园区黑暗内幕，扶手与盘总聚集地。 4️⃣人民日报 @renmin 东南亚实时新闻全天更新，全网唯一无广告非盈利媒体品牌。 5️⃣优质新闻频道可加入联盟在此处展示，价格8888U/月 ▪️流量来源介绍 😊表情包&emoji 😄电报百科导航 🎁中文包大全 😃😄😄😃😄 大咖 @daka 🎁
麦当劳 大乱斗 #打架
大街上卿卿我我 ！ #gay #亲嘴
😑 某种暗示 ？
岚图追光S 360°隧道大回环穿越成功！国产 #新能源 一天天都在研究什么东西 ？
你现在说 你爱我 我们还没离婚呢🤣 #抓奸 #吃瓜。
#摩托 #车祸 损伤惨重 怼什么大货车啊 ！
怎么回她好呢 ？
葡萄 美酒夜光杯 👀 #包厢文化 #奶子
#车祸 #电瓶车 撞上 #女司机 倒地 #抽搐
#采访 人妖访谈 👂 #人妖 #故事会
火腿肠练习生
Showing the 12 most recent of 162 posts we hold for @yuanqubot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@yuanqubot named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“缅北园区吃瓜” (@yuanqubot), 17,197 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuanqubot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.