Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 天眼

Channel

天眼

@yelloworblueHK

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,112subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001173613565
TypeChannel
Username@yelloworblueHK
Created8 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yelloworblueHK

Growth

17,09417,15517,124.56 August 2026 — 17,117 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,116 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,115 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,110 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,103 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,094 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,141 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,155 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,150 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,100 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,107 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,112 subscribers17,1126 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,085–17,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 18:2417,112+5
16 Aug 2026, 16:5517,107+7
15 Aug 2026, 03:4717,100-50
13 Aug 2026, 17:1617,150-5
12 Aug 2026, 14:4517,155+14
11 Aug 2026, 17:0417,141+47
10 Aug 2026, 18:1717,094-9
9 Aug 2026, 19:4117,103-7
8 Aug 2026, 19:5817,110-5
7 Aug 2026, 19:3217,115-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:0317,116-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:1717,117first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.70%
avg views ÷ 17,112 subscribers
Avg views / post
804
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.232%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 61 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held61 (30 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total49,050
Reactions total61
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29m 44s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 25 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩1931.1%
1016.4%
👍914.8%
👏711.5%
🤡58.20%
👎34.92%
🤣34.92%
😁23.28%
🏆11.64%
🔥11.64%
😱11.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC522 viewsread 17 August 2026
Video

南韓民眾因為有心人把他們選票扣留抗爭已75天了

16 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC545 viewsread 17 August 2026

香港第二季實質本地生產總值(GDP)按年增長4.3%,今年上半年經濟強勁增長5.1%,創近五年來最強勁的半年度表現。政府將全年經濟增長預測由原先的2.5%至3.5%,向上修訂至3.5%至4.5%。

15 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC777 views2 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

一位27歲的年輕人 Oliver Conroy,只是懷著期待去赴約,結果居然被一群青少年用「假交友帳號」誘騙出去。他以為遇到了愛情,等來的卻是一場殘忍的伏擊! 最讓人不敢相信的是,這7名青少年! 最小的甚至只有14歲! 目的竟然只是為了搶走他的車! 他們把他硬生生拖出車外打成重傷,扔在路中央離去,最後送醫不治…… 一個活生生的年輕生命,就這樣被一群毫無人性的小孩毀了。更讓人氣憤的是,涉案的17歲少年在法庭上被控謀殺時,居然還能笑著向台下的媽媽吹飛吻?!到底要多冷血才能做出這種事? 澳洲真的快被這群不知天高地厚的年輕人給搞壞了! 青少年犯罪越來越猖獗、手段越來越殘忍,如果法律再繼續寬容、年齡繼續成為殺人的避風港,未來的社會到底還有沒有安全可言?! 這7個加害者全部都應該承擔最嚴厲的法律制裁!嚴懲青少年犯罪,別再讓無辜的生命白白犧牲! 願 Oliver 安息,希望家屬能得到公道。

1😱1

15 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC721 viewsread 17 August 2026
Video

克羅埃西亞達爾馬提亞海岸的海邊小鎮 Omiš,離第二大城斯普利特約25公里;日期是8/14入夜到8/15凌晨燒起來的。 當時強風把火直接吹進鎮裡,路透、CNN有報,1人死亡、14到40人送醫,超過1000人撤到體育館避難,影片裡消防車開往火牆的畫面是現場實拍。

15 Aug 2026, 01:55 UTC713 viewsread 17 August 2026
Video

哥倫比亞地震沒幾天,換印尼地震 7.7 強震 深度10-15公里。

15 Aug 2026, 01:27 UTC607 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1866230-20260815.htm

14 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC777 views2 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

【成田機場交通全面中斷】 千葉縣降下破紀錄的超大豪雨,直到深夜都沒有趨緩的跡象。JR、京成電鐵的軌道與車站、高速公路,甚至一般平面道路都嚴重積水,導致往返成田機場的電車、機場巴士、計程車全部停擺,聯外交通完全中斷。巿區有地方還水浸停電。 千葉縣暴雨︱至少4死1失蹤

👏2

13 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC741 views2 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

東京千葉縣下午開始狂風暴雨 14個市水浸+ 4萬戶停電, 水深及腰 短短三星期地震,冰雹,暴雨,打風

1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @yelloworblueHK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 951,112 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“天眼” (@yelloworblueHK), 17,112 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yelloworblueHK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.