Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 40 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,677–9,843 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 10:22
9,778
+82
11 Sept 2026, 18:19
9,696
-6
7 Sept 2026, 13:57
9,702
-14
3 Sept 2026, 01:38
9,716
-17
31 Aug 2026, 05:13
9,733
-12
28 Aug 2026, 15:52
9,745
+1
26 Aug 2026, 00:17
9,744
-13
23 Aug 2026, 02:14
9,757
-10
20 Aug 2026, 00:22
9,767
-10
16 Aug 2026, 20:04
9,777
-13
13 Aug 2026, 14:06
9,790
-18
10 Aug 2026, 04:11
9,808
-13
6 Aug 2026, 22:44
9,821
-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:16
9,824
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:59
9,824
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 35 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 29s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,297 reactions across 35 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
588
45.3%
🔥
271
20.9%
👍
122
9.41%
😁
96
7.40%
✍
51
3.93%
💔
41
3.16%
🤣
31
2.39%
💯
22
1.70%
🙏
20
1.54%
🤝
13
1.00%
🎉
12
0.925%
🤔
11
0.848%
👌
6
0.463%
🤩
5
0.386%
❤🔥
4
0.308%
💋
2
0.154%
💘
2
0.154%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,297 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
2.86%
1 of 35 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
868
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
967
over 34 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjcAbZNB
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
В мире, котором все стараются давить на то, что их средства без отдушки, появился бренд MY. Они даже в уходе для лица вон как над ароматикой постарались.
Это бренд, кстати, одних из моих любимцев Premium Cosmetic (я даже у них на заводе была, там прям хорошо). Поэтому кредит доверия присутствует. Пару банок на тест уже заказала.
Как относитесь к аромату в уходе для лица?
Как назло с такими ногтями сразу нужно делать что-то по дому. Так что у нас снова рубрика «хозяюшка не по призванию, а по настроению». Лайфхак снова выявлен случайно:
Если у вас в доме светлая и достаточно пористая плитка и вы хоть не видите, но подозреваете забитую в эти поры грязюку — можно нанести вот такой Sanfor. Но если честно, то скорее всего любое аналогичное средство.
Пробуем, как всегда на незаметном мест…
Я намекала-намекала, а вы даже не заметили, что 6-летний домашний маникюр сменился экстра-стилетами.
Эра ноготочечной курильщика (это когда ты убеждаешь себя, что дома тоже прекрасно делаешь маникюр) закончена. И наступает эра Ноготочечной здорового человека (это которая Коза).
За 6 лет, как оказалось, научились делать маникюр супер аккуратно. Или это просто Ноготочечная супер.
Короче, как вам? И наращивание, и ди…
Абсолютно была уверена, что самая известная антиотечная линейка — от @icon_skin. И это абсолютно оправдано: не надо бультыхаться в миске со льдом, как западные блогеры.
Рекомендую брать именно парой:
Тоник от ICON SKIN — с 5% кофеина на каждый день. И это самый простой способ ввести в рутину ежедневный антиотек. Это критично важно: отёк + гравитация в долгосрочной перспективе может аукнуться.
В маске ICON SKIN уже…
Минимум на 50% люксовой сегодня получилась «воскресная зажировка». Потому что подарки суперские:
• SUBSTANCE Kebab × evo [иво]
При заказе спешала (авокадо-тост на пите) в подарок идёт интенсивно увлажняющий несмываемый уход для волос Happy Campers (50 мл, но это ж супер брать с собой)
• SUBSTANCE × DARLING
При заказе любой позиции (малиновые панкейки со свежей малиной, персиком и взбитыми сливками или розовая матча…
Если бы я была технологом, то постоянно бы смешивала ретиноиды, чтобы создать идеальный. Мою мечту реализовал технолог Geltek’a, потому что смотрите, что они натворили: выпустили крем-сыворотку Triple-A (ретинол — это витамин А, напоминаю), в которой сразу 3 формы:
• ретиналь (0,1%)
•• ретинил ретиноат (0,1%)
••• ретинил пальмитат (0,2%)
А ещё это все ин-кап-су-ли-ро-ван-но. Восторг! Благодаря этому все три формы вы…
Я: считаю УФ-зеркало игрушкой дьявола (на самом деле просто из-за того, что не понимаю, как у коллег получается адекватно в неё сфоткаться)
Все: думают, что эта камера покажет, какой санскрин классный и точно защитит от солнца.
Давайте развенчивать этот миф:
На самом деле, такая «игрушка» покажет вам только степень покрытия, но никак не степень защиты. Постараюсь не душнить и просто напишу, что защитные фильтры в …
Как называется чувство, когда выступая публично, тебе кажется, что великолепна, а потом смотришь эту запись? Вы слышите эту отвратительную речь? Короче, у меня теперь есть план:
1. Читать книги. Точнее делать это вслух. Проверено: хорошо подтягивает словарный запас.
2. Пойти на ораторские курсы. Но так как я стесняшка, то пока не готова идти в группу и позориться прилюдно. Да и ничего не подтянет речь так, как регу…
Кому нужно мыло без отдушек в обязательном порядке? Тем, кто носит элайнеры. Вы же помните, что зубной пастой их не чистим? Всем остальным — по желанию.
В любом случае сохраняйте это: детское жидкое мыло 0+ Rossinka. Большой объем, ни намека аромат, а вот ощущение чистоты присутствует.
Ориентируйтесь на цену до 400₽, а то смотрю, что кто-то и за тыщу, и за две сейчас продает.
❤26✍9🔥7🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @economno_o_beauty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@economno_o_beauty edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А теперь наше любимое: как, думаете, правильно произносится название бренда KEUNE? Чур, не подсматривать! Нажав на вариант — сразу увидите верный
Кьюн14%
Кеюн18%
Кёнэ55%
Как по кайфу13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
жопа луковичкой @dash_kupi_garazh · 31,191 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 6 September 2026
Встала и пошла! @vstalaipohla · 33,376 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
В женской шкуре @elya_bulochka · 49,447 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
Lab.Vera @beauty_blogers · 53,701 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Культ ухода @drubinaaa · 29,979 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
Взгляд химика на крем @Lenaprokosmetiku · 52,558 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
ANANASSKIN🧴PRO КОЖУ И УХОД @ananasskin · 35,032 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
Купи, молись, люби @buy_pray_love · 46,032 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
BEAUTY PLEASURE✨ @beauty_pleasure · 34,341 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Дизигн интерьера @desingokey · 35,095 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Банок много, я одна” (@economno_o_beauty), 9,778 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/economno_o_beauty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.