#凤凰卫视:妙瓦底诈骗园区卷土重来 新据点不断出现 9月28日,凤凰卫视援引缅甸媒体报道,缅甸妙瓦底地区网络诈骗活动再次出现扩张迹象。 位于妙瓦底附近的水沟谷,过去曾多次遭到清剿并拆除部分诈骗园区,但今年初开始,当地又有新的园区陆续建设,部分已经投入使用,并通过社交平台公开招募人员。 除了水沟谷外,妙瓦底市区部分区域和山区也出现新的诈骗据点,部分此前停止运作的园区重新恢复活动。有缅甸议员表示,当局需要加强对地方行政部门的监督,推动各省邦持续打击网络诈骗活动。

Channel
今日东南亚大事件曝光-悬赏
@jrdnyxs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
60,168subscribers
+2,116 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001501199191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jrdnyxs |
| Description | #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国 今日东南亚大事件频道致力维护所有在外的兄弟姐妹利益,遭受任何不公对待请及时曝光或投稿!希望在外的兄弟顺风顺水 注:本频道没有任何小频道,所有看到的都是模仿和假频道请各位厂商仔细查阅 投稿爆料: @qllty001 商务合作: @qllty001 |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jrdnyxs |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 60,168 | -5,814 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 65,982 | -3,283 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 69,265 | -1,299 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 70,564 | -1,264 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 71,828 | +2,904 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 68,924 | +4,749 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:35 | 64,175 | +5,407 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 58,768 | -1,759 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 60,527 | +46 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:04 | 60,481 | -66 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 60,547 | -139 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 60,686 | -81 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 60,767 | +2,156 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 58,611 | -53 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 58,664 | +55 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 58,609 | -173 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 58,782 | -341 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 59,123 | +1,424 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 57,699 | -137 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 57,836 | first reading |
Engagement
796 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.17%
- avg views ÷ 60,168 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,110
- 493 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.114%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 493
- of 796 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 493 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 796 (8 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,532,554 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 14:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈24,200
- Videos
- ≈2,400
- Links
- ≈1,850
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4h 07m
- Average length
- 50s
Measured directly from 299 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,040 reactions across 100 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 756 | 24.9% | |
| 🔥 | 462 | 15.2% | |
| ❤ | 305 | 10.0% | |
| 😍 | 301 | 9.90% | |
| 💯 | 295 | 9.70% | |
| 🥰 | 256 | 8.42% | |
| 👀 | 222 | 7.30% | |
| 😡 | 93 | 3.06% | |
| ⚡ | 75 | 2.47% | |
| 😱 | 71 | 2.34% | |
| 👏 | 48 | 1.58% | |
| 🙏 | 41 | 1.35% | |
| 🤬 | 35 | 1.15% | |
| 😢 | 30 | 0.987% | |
| 👎 | 27 | 0.888% | |
| 💔 | 11 | 0.362% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 0.23% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.132% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.033% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 796 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,040 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 796 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#西港消息:西港警察局开展行动,逮捕了两名中国籍人士并扣押了一辆豪华车辆;具体涉案性质尚未披露,尚待省警方确认。
网友投稿:西港“星汇3-1” 目前有👮正在开展执法行动,带防弹衣了,应该是抓人的,注意待在房间,别影响执法!
ZachXBT爆料:Bitget被朝鲜黑客盗的钱 中国洗钱团队正在用Discord 服务器和 Telegram 频道售卖。
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🤩NO钱包担保3亿U|可查验! 😀 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 📱官方频道:@DF78 ➡️关注领VIP 🔝大品牌,实力派:78.COM 本身就是最好的辨识度。 ✅️香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍,封顶赔率! 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩连码四中四🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 💥新人超会赢,精彩时刻分享: 🥇六合彩 玩家用7个号码组合下注连码三全中(35注)➕四全中(35注),每注100U,结果开出4个号码。命中4注878倍及一注10000倍大奖,稳稳落袋135万U; 🥈PG电子 9月4号,壹玩家游戏中爆出268万U大奖,本金仅用2.6万U; 🥉DB真人 玩百家乐的老板,第一天存款50万U,连续7天每日提款…
🇻🇳 2名越南蛇头组织偷渡致人死亡被判刑 今天,越南同塔省法院作出判决,以“组织他人非法出境罪”分别判处吴黄清9年监禁、阮红海8年监禁。 去年11月24日,警方在胡志明市-中良-美顺高速公路发现一名马来西亚籍男子遗体。经查,被告受雇将入境越南的外籍人员经安江省偷渡至柬埔寨网诈园区。案发当日,该马籍男子在被转运途中因情绪失控跳车身亡。 此外,两人还曾多次组织偷渡并牟取暴利。
柬埔寨10省遭洪灾,超4.49万户受影响 柬埔寨国家灾害管理委员会今天通报,暴雨引发山洪,全国已有10个省份受灾,马德望、班迭棉吉、暹粒三省灾情最为严重。 截至目前,洪灾已影响44889户家庭,3685户家庭紧急转移至高地。洪水淹没4万余栋房屋,近5万公顷稻田受损。 有关部门已做好救援和应急准备。气象预报显示,受台风外围环流影响,柬埔寨大部分地区强降雨将持续至9月30日。
#网友投稿:“西港”红灯笼隔壁,独牙附近,宪兵队正在沿街开展例行检查,途经人员以及附近的兄弟注意!
Bitget CEO:黑客转出资产约3.88亿美元,动用保护基金后一周内将补足至3亿美元以上 9月28日消息,Bitget CEO Gracy Chen 在直播中表示,攻击者利用第三方安全产品漏洞窃取内网凭证权限,向钱包系统伪造提现指令,绕过风控校验。不过本次攻击并未造成私钥泄露,冷钱包也未受影响。 目前漏洞已修复,事件已得到完全控制。 经确认,被转出资产约 3.88 亿美元,攻击者地址及链上追踪数据已公开发布。Gracy Chen 表示,本次损失将全部由用户保护基金承担,Bitget 将在基金动用后一周内将保护基金补足至至少 3 亿美元。 目前 Bitget 已启动资产追回相关计划,并将向行业相关方同步已确认的漏洞和攻击信息。
#老挝资讯:天网恢恢!万象突袭涉诈窝点,几十名电诈分子被押解回国! 7月初,老挝公安部门重拳出击,在万象鱼塘成功突袭了一处隐蔽的诈骗窝点,当场抓获几十名中国籍涉案人员(含1名女性),现场查获100多台手机和20多台电脑。 据老方通报,警方冲进现场时,这伙人正疯狂敲击键盘进行诈骗,被当场人赃并获!在完成相关法律程序后,9月中旬,这批涉诈人员已被依法移交中国警方,悉数押解回国,等待他们的将是法律的严惩! 互联网没有法外之地,出来混迟早要还。不管曾经在圈子里多风光,触碰了法律红线,终究是一场空。陀爷别拿“风流”当借口。在此支持中国警方深挖彻查 姓名:大鹏 、严查三代,此人罪大恶极。
🇮🇹 AI冒充高管克隆声音 意大利一银行被骗9500万欧元 据消息人士披露,诈骗分子利用AI技术冒充高管,从意大利最大银行Intesa Sanpaolo旗下的私人银行Fideuram盗走9500万欧元(约1.08亿美元)。 今年2月,诈骗团伙伪造集团CEO的即时通讯信息,并利用AI深度克隆知名律师声音拨打电话,诱导时任Fideuram董事长保罗·莫莱西尼安排向中国内地及香港等地的海外账户转账。 银行随后发现异常并报警,经多国执法合作成功追回约5300万欧元,但仍有约3600万欧元经多国账户清洗并兑换为加密货币后下落不明。高管团队未被调查,莫莱西尼已于3月辞职。米兰检方目前已对一名涉案的外籍嫌疑人展开调查。
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 😀😀😀😀😀😀 ➡️ 全网已押千万u点击传送门 👈 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️数字网投领导者! ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 始终坚持“用户至上,信誉为本”的运营理念,力求为玩家带来公平公正、真实专业的高品质游戏竞技,让你体验顶级博彩乐趣! 【🇺🇦:🇺🇦😻🤔🥴🤧😷👿,创造人生新财富!】 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 顶级博彩娱乐尽在⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🙄😶😄😶 😀体育官方合作品牌, 为荣耀而战 让梦想实现😀 😀 新人六重豪礼 😀代理八重扶持 😀 每日专属优惠活动 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ : @bifagj 🐋🐋🐋🐋 : ht
Showing the 12 most recent of 796 posts we hold for @jrdnyxs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@jiandan8884 · 127,089#1
@bgdsj26 · 120,707#2
@DNYzzz6 · 46,891#3
@huich79 · 42,739#4
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 48,931#5
@bx66664 · 135,881#6
@QQ888880000 · 106,341#7
@dnyqqbj · 120,578#8
@cc199 · 74,129#9
@BGS8989 · 89,871#10
@TTDR8 · 88,323#11
@xigang13 · 63,166#12
@pianzi1 · 53,362#13
@aq7777 · 54,495#14
@bgtjt · 104,598#15
@dnyuuu88 · 125,961#16
@dsj665 · 113,606#17
@bx666 · 467,845#18
@GGooGG66 · 150,280#19
@jpz0123 · 50,556#20
@nx123 · 771,520#21
@kanxia · 470,157#22
@bodu08 · 58,821#23
@DNYXSTJL6668 · 10,055#24
@Kolebule8119 · 3,816#25
@dnybgtt · 53,637#26
@dnyxinwen668 · 48,041#27
@dny88 · 65,507#28
@YYL333 · 89,772#29
@kk4568 · 126,337#30
@TGBG8888 · 85,601#31
@AQzx_3 · 93,113#32
@DNYTJL3 · 93,598#33
@DNYBG234 · 86,663#34
@dashijianbot1 · 269#35
@vjtyd · 72,407#36
@kz692nn · 129,757#37
@AQzx_2 · 80,997#38
@bg833 · 322,837#39
@zdhqxw · 717#40
@db933 · 201,951#41
@baoguangba088 · 236,958#42
@DNYBGT · 6,027#43
@DNY181 · 50,098#44
@qqt13 · 203,311#45
@quanwangbaoguangb · 148,210#46
@AQzx_1 · 175,586#47
@pyzcn · 220,166#48
@huaren_zixun · 86,816#49
@ttkb0 · 120,417#50
@bc7890 · 3,879#51
@aa144 · 35,225#52
@dnyxwtt · 52,104#53
@bx777 · 43,100#54
@Cukicnk777 · 2,861#55
@cgbg8 · 103,458#56
@jsj62 · 22,648#57
@dubaixinwen2 · 221,985#58
@davydovin · 1,889,362#59
@XmindsCoin · 3,280#60
@russianonwars · 102,399#61
@redacted6 · 1,051,444#62
@visual_hedonist · 312,529#63
@ukr_shvydko · 310,572#64
@adelimkhanov_95 · 1,844,287#65
@Akatsuki_Calls_x1000 · 10,483#66
@Cryptowhalepump_official · 21,473#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@DNYzzz6 · 46,891
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
@bgdsj26 · 120,707
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 48,931
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@jiandan8884 · 127,089
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 August 2026
@dnyqqbj · 120,578
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@bx66664 · 135,881
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@cc199 · 74,129
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
@QQ888880000 · 106,341
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@TTDR8 · 88,323
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@bgtjt · 104,598
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@aq7777 · 54,495
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@pianzi1 · 53,362
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 125,961
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@xigang13 · 63,166
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
@dsj665 · 113,606
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@GGooGG66 · 150,280
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@visual_hedonist · 312,529
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
@dnyxinwen668 · 48,041
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@Cryptowhalepump_official · 21,473
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
@ukr_shvydko · 310,572
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@davydovin · 1,889,362
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“今日东南亚大事件曝光-悬赏” (@jrdnyxs), 60,168 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jrdnyxs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.