Channel
@canal2018
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,302subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001135501948 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @canal2018 |
| Created | 12 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/canal2018 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 1,302 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 1,304 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 1,307 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 1,307 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 22 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
https://t.me/bbbreaking/211509 50 дней ультиматума Трампа получаются не вполне ультимативными. Критерием успеха может стать начало реальных переговоров, скажем, не стамбульского формата, а более серьезного. А может и не стать.
🗣 Дональд Трамп подтвердил возможный визит в Китай и не исключил встречу с Владимиром Путиным Президент США заявил, что получил приглашение от председателя КНР Си Цзиньпина посетить Китай и, вероятно, отправится туда в обозрим будущем, хотя точные сроки пока не определены. «Вчера в Кремле заявили: если он поедет в Пекин в сентябре, они не исключают встречи между ним и президентом Путиным. Возможна ли такая встреча,…
Обсуждая очередного чеченского военного, за которого заступился Апти Алаудинов, Z-авторы поднимают и еще одну актуальную для российской армии тему: «Штурмовка» Луганского бассейна — обнажает очень важную проблему на фронте... Называется эта проблема — отмазка от преступлений через СВО. Не буду называть таксы за это (кому надо она хорошо известна), но этот вид злоупотреблений к сожалению, не только имеет место быть…
СМИ пишут, что в Чечне власти закрыли четыре магазина одежды из-за «неподобающей рекламы» и пообещали открыть их, если владельцы удалят недостойные публикации, и призвали предпринимательниц не переходить рамки дозволенного. Сделано это было после того, как эти четыре магазина лично посетил помощник главы Чечни, заместитель руководителя секретариата главы республики и куратор молодежи республики Амир Сугаипов. Перед э…
Глеб Трифонов нашелся, оказывается его держали в тонированном микроавтобусе во дворе здания СУ СК по ЦАО г.Москвы. После предыдущего поста с обращением адвоката с просьбой дать ответ, где же находится уже более 10 часов Глеб, главреда «Базы» и его невесту вывели из тонированного автобуса и завели в здание. Однако защиту к Глебу Трифонову и еще одной сотруднице издания пока так и не пускают.
«Нужно выучить наизусть пять тысяч названий»: как будет работать принятый Госдумой запрет поиска «экстремистских материалов» Принятие в третьем чтении законопроекта о запрете на поиск экстремистских материалов в интернете сопровождалось редкой для Госдумы с начала войны с Украиной дискуссией. Депутаты пытались разобраться в том, как будет работать законопроект. В итоге спикер Госдумы Вячеслав Володин предложил приня…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @canal2018. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 826,458 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НеДавыдов” (@canal2018), 1,302 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/canal2018.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.