巴基斯坦拉合尔警方查处非法呼叫中心,约150人被拘捕 10月1日,据巴基斯坦媒体ABN News视频报道,巴基斯坦联邦调查局(FIA)网络犯罪部门近日在拉合尔展开行动,针对涉嫌利用非法呼叫中心实施诈骗活动的人员进行调查。 报道称,执法人员在行动中共拘捕约150名涉案人员,其中包括男性、女性以及部分外籍女性人员。目前,被捕人员已被依法登记案件,后续调查工作正在进行中。 据报道,相关非法呼叫中心涉嫌通过电话等方式开展诈骗活动,具体诈骗模式、涉案金额以及受害范围暂未公布。 截至目前,官方尚未公开披露此次行动的具体日期、详细地点以及外籍人员身份信息,暂无法确认其中是否涉及中国籍人员。 巴基斯坦近年来持续加强对网络犯罪、诈骗团伙及非法呼叫中心的打击力度,相关部门也多次针对涉嫌网络诈骗活动的窝点展开突查行动。 案件目前仍在进一步调查中,后续信息有待警方及相关部门公布。

Channel
东南亚大事件-曝光-黑料
@DNYzzz6
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
46,891subscribers
-9,417 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001546752931 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DNYzzz6 |
| Description | #东南亚 看尽所有东南亚不为人知的一面,让出国淘金的朋友都能安全回家 投稿爆料➡️➡️➡️: @xiao888888hu |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DNYzzz6 |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:42 | 46,891 | -12,478 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 59,369 | -3,577 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 62,946 | -1,707 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 64,653 | -1,442 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 66,095 | +3,222 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 62,873 | +7,719 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 55,154 | -3,259 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 58,413 | -1,006 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:46 | 59,419 | -534 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:44 | 59,953 | -682 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:15 | 60,635 | -188 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 60,823 | +1,986 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 58,837 | -45 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 58,882 | +27 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 58,855 | +57 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 58,798 | -121 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 58,919 | -236 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 59,155 | +1,516 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 57,639 | -156 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:59 | 57,795 | first reading |
Engagement
801 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 109 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.56%
- avg views ÷ 46,891 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,080
- 463 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.037%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 463
- of 801 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 463 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 801 (8 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,424,462 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 04:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈23,400
- Videos
- ≈2,190
- Links
- ≈1,730
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4h 20m
- Average length
- 54s
Measured directly from 289 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 34 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 16 | 45.7% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 11.4% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 8.57% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 5.71% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 801 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 801 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🇨🇳奇安信盘古石取证完成升级,支持Android 17系统取证 10月1日,奇安信旗下盘古石取证团队发布消息,盘古石手机取证R8.8.0版本完成更新,实现Android 17系统提权适配,同时新增三星、小米设备Android 16提权提取能力。 新版本在数据解析能力上实现突破,可定位并重组微信已删除的图片、语音和视频碎片,重建完整聊天上下文。解析模块新增豆包、千问、快手极速版、抖音极速版等应用支持,适配新版“Telegram”数据结构,并持续优化企业微信、抖音等应用解析能力。 在设备提取方面,新版本提升鸿蒙设备IMEI提取稳定性,OPPO Wi-Fi提取新增私密空间数据支持;新增MTP模式识别、低电量识别及提示功能,降低取证任务中断风险。 此外,本次更新新增统一用户管理、分权登录、操作审计以及自定义水印等安全管控功能,满足取证工作的合规留痕要求。 此次升级进一步优化多款手机设备的数据提取稳定性,扩充主流社交应用的数据解…
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 😀😀😀😀😀😀 ➡️ 全网已押千万u点击传送门 👈 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️数字网投领导者! ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 始终坚持“用户至上,信誉为本”的运营理念,力求为玩家带来公平公正、真实专业的高品质游戏竞技,让你体验顶级博彩乐趣! 【🇺🇦:🇺🇦😻🤔🥴🤧😷👿,创造人生新财富!】 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 顶级博彩娱乐尽在⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🙄😶😄😶 😀体育官方合作品牌, 为荣耀而战 让梦想实现😀 😀 新人六重豪礼 😀代理八重扶持 😀 每日专属优惠活动 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ : @bifagj 🐋🐋🐋🐋 : ht
#最新消息:🇰🇭西港太子寰宇公寓今天被抓的推推,目前第一批被控制人员已经陆续被警车带离现场
#网友爆料:关于缅甸妙瓦底“瑞埃妙”园区(金水河/托基线区域)中国籍受害者遭非人道虐待的举报线索 目前,在缅甸妙瓦底“瑞埃妙”园区(位于托基线区域,Thaw Gyi Line / Shwe Aye Myaing Area),有一名外号叫“菲菲”(Fei Fei)、身上有大量纹身的中国籍涉黑头目,手段极其残忍。 据知情人透露,该园区内存在大量被拐卖、诱骗至此的中国籍受害者。这名绰号“菲菲”的人员对这些受害者实施了极其残酷的暴力与非法拘禁,手段令人发指。由于当地部分执法势力与地方武装对其提供庇护,受害者目前求助无门,处境极度危险。 为了尽快解救这些无辜的中国同胞,并打击该跨国犯罪团伙,恳请中国警方(反诈及反人部门)以及国际人权组织高度关注此线索,并协同相关部门展开跨国救援与联合打击行动!
#菲律宾资讯:马卡蒂端掉大型“恋爱诈骗”窝点 超120人被一锅端多数是中国人 9月30日,菲律宾国家调查局公布一起“恋爱诈骗”案件。9月26日晚,执法人员突袭马卡蒂市阿亚拉大道一处办公场所,超过120人被控制,其中多数为中国籍人员。 这个窝点以类似呼叫中心的模式运作,主要通过网络交友和虚假约会服务寻找目标。诈骗人员利用女性照片吸引受害者聊天,逐步建立感情关系,再诱导对方付款。 执法人员在电脑中发现大量女性照片、聊天记录和诈骗话术。部分受害者还被诱导发送私密照片或视频,这些内容随后可能被拿来勒索。受害者包括菲律宾人和外国人。涉案人员已被带走调查,菲律宾执法部门同时核查其中外国人的移民身份,案件仍在进一步处理中。
#网友爆料 骗我 20万u 灿,现在给你机会,看到回消息。 东南亚不是这么混的。不要逼我对你使什么手段,你跑的了,你家人往哪里跑,你想清楚。 我相信你在群里能看到,今天晚上12点前不回消息,所有信息我都给你实名报出来,你自己考虑好后果,有什么事都可以商量,不要把事情做的太绝了,大家都是出来混的 什么事能做什么事不能做自己心里掂量清楚,今天晚上12点之前我要是收不到你的回复信息,所有实名包括你的家人,全部交给会员。自己考虑好,慎重,慎重,再慎重。
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🤩NO钱包担保3亿U|可查验! 😀 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 📱官方频道:@DF78 ➡️关注领VIP 🔝大品牌,实力派:78.COM 本身就是最好的辨识度。 ✅️香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍,封顶赔率! 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩连码四中四🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 💥新人超会赢,精彩时刻分享: 🥇六合彩 玩家用7个号码组合下注连码三全中(35注)➕四全中(35注),每注100U,结果开出4个号码。命中4注878倍及一注10000倍大奖,稳稳落袋135万U; 🥈PG电子 9月4号,壹玩家游戏中爆出268万U大奖,本金仅用2.6万U; 🥉DB真人 玩百家乐的老板,第一天存款50万U,连续7天每日提款5…
#网友投稿:🇰🇭西港双狮这里刚刚有十几个宪兵进去酒店查房了,附近的注意了!!
网友投稿:西港“OB3 区域”,警方正在对该区域的公寓酒店进行检查,附近的兄弟注意了! Ps:太难了😂
柬埔寨全面整顿赌场网络赌博 28家赌场停止网赌业务 柬埔寨国家打击网络诈骗委员会与商业博彩管理委员会联合行动,截至2026年9月30日,西港(12家)、卜迭棉芷(7家)及柴桢(9家)共28家赌场已全面停止所有线上赌博与直播投注业务,并拆除清运相关设备。 此外,执法部门已在全国打击逾600处网诈窝点。截至9月,已有14家涉诈赌场被吊销牌照,另有9家被收回牌照并接受进一步调查。柬官方表示,将依法查封、扣押及没收相关涉案资产与赌场股权。
🇰🇭西港太子寰宇公寓最新状况:现在楼上都是警察,6楼抓了几十号人了。目前宪兵还在继续坚持,看样子快结束了
Showing the 12 most recent of 801 posts we hold for @DNYzzz6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@jiandan8884 · 127,089#1
@jrdnyxs · 60,168#2
@bgdsj26 · 122,084#3
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 48,931#4
@huich79 · 42,739#5
@dnyqqbj · 120,578#6
@QQ888880000 · 106,341#7
@bx66664 · 136,141#8
@BGS8989 · 89,871#9
@TTDR8 · 88,323#10
@cc199 · 74,129#11
@xigang13 · 63,166#12
@bgtjt · 105,838#13
@aq7777 · 53,208#14
@pianzi1 · 53,362#15
@dnyuuu88 · 125,961#16
@dny1577 · 5,343#17
@cctv_dy · 36,686#18
@DNYBG234 · 86,663#19
@iiiik · 47,328#20
@GGooGG66 · 150,280#21
@baoguangba088 · 236,958#22
@nx123 · 785,762#23
@dsj665 · 108,595#24
@anwei2 · 36,660#25
@TGPG999 · 4,714#26
@kz692nn · 129,757#27
@xbbg8 · 280#28
@xuanshangP · 1,633#29
@dny88 · 63,407#30
@heicaibaog · 82,598 (as read 23 August 2026)#31
@ChiGua8999 · 11,870#32
@dnyxst · 70,799#33
@BGSS8 · 1,029#34
@dnyxinwen668 · 40,493#35
@DNYBGT · 6,035#36
@bx666 · 467,845#37
@hrs166 · 43,319#38
@quanwangbaoguangb · 148,210#39
@tghuarenba · 44,364#40
@xinwen118 · 120,827#41
@db933 · 14,342#42
@jpz0123 · 50,556#43
@DNYXSTJL6668 · 10,055#44
@tg89aa · 137,688#45
@vipn8888 · 67,457#46
@bbb1b · 329,787#47
@BG423 · 33,478#48
@quanqiubaoliao · 172,311#49
@dongnanya108 · 158,477#50
@bg855 · 322,052#51
@BG886 · 54,584#52
@taiguohuarenzixun · 83,128#53
@huaren_zixun · 86,816#54
@miandianhuarenzixun · 70,910#55
@bodu08 · 58,821#56
@gtkx1 · 164,479#57
@YYL333 · 107,277#58
@baoguang821 · 51,566#59
@baoguang032 · 21,119#60
@ttkb0 · 120,699#61
@QQDS999 · 169,247#62
@russianonwars · 101,842#63
@davydovin · 1,895,712#64
@ukr_shvydko · 310,572#65
@EvPanina · 136,131#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 48,931
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@jrdnyxs · 60,168
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@bgdsj26 · 122,084
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnyqqbj · 120,578
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@bgtjt · 105,838
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@jiandan8884 · 127,089
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 August 2026
@bx66664 · 136,141
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@QQ888880000 · 106,341
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@TTDR8 · 88,323
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@cc199 · 74,129
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
@aq7777 · 53,208
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@xigang13 · 63,166
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
@pianzi1 · 53,362
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 125,961
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnyxinwen668 · 40,493
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@GGooGG66 · 150,280
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@dsj665 · 108,595
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@visual_hedonist · 311,222
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
@Cryptowhalepump_official · 21,473
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
@ukr_shvydko · 310,572
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@davydovin · 1,895,712
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件-曝光-黑料” (@DNYzzz6), 46,891 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DNYzzz6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.