菲律宾第三季度增长疲软 央行仍可能大幅加息 菲律宾第三季度经济增速放缓至2.1%,为疫情以外逾16年来最弱表现,但野村全球市场研究经济学家仍预计,菲律宾央行将在12月政策会议上将关键利率上调50个基点至6%,以遏制高通胀。野村称,若全球油价持续下跌抵消食品成本上涨,也可能仅加息25个基点。菲律宾央行上月已加息50个基点至5.5%。大华银行预计,央行将在12月及2027年第一季度各加息25个基点,因通胀压力持续且比索疲软,暂缓加息的可能性较小。
🎉16🔥14❤9👍9😍8

Channel
@bx66664
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
137,026subscribers
-2,247 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001236817864 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bx66664 |
| Description | 让你看尽海外实事 东南亚一手新闻资讯 揭露所有东南亚黑幕 一切黑公司 黑人事跑路骗局 最新吃瓜 最新悬赏 最新曝光 尽在东南亚新闻吃瓜大曝光 ☎️投稿爆料-商务合作: @daixiaobu68688 欢迎大家订阅,揭露事实,曝光真相! 内容申明:不负责判别真假~~~~希望广大网友自己能分别是非,可以信,但是不能全信,之所以发出来供大家阅读,主要还是为了防止更多人踩坑! #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #泰国 #迪拜 #缅甸 #老挝 #马来西亚 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bx66664 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 7 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @bx66664/35696 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC | @azzxx8848/1104831 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @bx66664/35722 · this entry29 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC | @azzxx8848/110531 Sept 2026, 05:27 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @bx66664/35733 · this entry29 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC | @azzxx8848/110681 Sept 2026, 12:29 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @bx66664/35734 · this entry29 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC | @azzxx8848/110691 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @bx66664/35890 · this entry3 Sept 2026, 09:36 UTC | @azzxx8848/111665 Sept 2026, 12:29 UTC | 1.00 | 2 days |
| @bx66664/36009 · this entry6 Sept 2026, 11:34 UTC | @azzxx8848/112539 Sept 2026, 06:55 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @azzxx8848 | 146 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3 days | this entry (146–0) |
| @seevcr | 99 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 47 hours | this entry (99–0) |
| @SEAUPD | 53 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 7.2 hours | this entry (51–2) |
| @zol_com_cn | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.95 | 23 hours | @zol_com_cn (4–3) |
| @newsxxnx | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 5.1 hours | @newsxxnx (6–1) |
| @meirixinwenquan | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.91 | 2.7 hours | @meirixinwenquan (3–2) |
| @dny2023flb | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.93 | 3.5 hours | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 13 of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,972 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 07:35 | 137,026 | -491 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 12:40 | 137,517 | -1,078 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 03:20 | 138,595 | -733 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:41 | 139,328 | -1,468 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 05:01 | 140,796 | -673 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:47 | 141,469 | -260 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:28 | 141,729 | -427 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:09 | 142,156 | -461 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:57 | 142,617 | -232 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:36 | 142,849 | -147 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:47 | 142,996 | -420 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:51 | 143,416 | -945 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:11 | 144,361 | -874 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:51 | 145,235 | -713 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:11 | 145,948 | -424 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:39 | 146,372 | -265 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:49 | 146,637 | -418 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:20 | 147,055 | -854 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:25 | 147,909 | -3,807 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:38 | 151,716 | first reading |
1,991 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 518 of 529 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,991 (7 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,813,574 |
| Reactions total | 19,263 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 03:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 92 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
38,375 reactions across 984 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12,115 | 31.6% | |
| 👍 | 5,258 | 13.7% | |
| 🔥 | 5,047 | 13.2% | |
| 🎉 | 4,853 | 12.6% | |
| 🤩 | 2,433 | 6.34% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2,179 | 5.68% | |
| 🥰 | 2,089 | 5.44% | |
| 😍 | 2,055 | 5.36% | |
| 💯 | 2,006 | 5.23% | |
| 👏 | 279 | 0.727% | |
| 😁 | 61 | 0.159% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 985 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 September 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 529 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
菲律宾第三季度增长疲软 央行仍可能大幅加息 菲律宾第三季度经济增速放缓至2.1%,为疫情以外逾16年来最弱表现,但野村全球市场研究经济学家仍预计,菲律宾央行将在12月政策会议上将关键利率上调50个基点至6%,以遏制高通胀。野村称,若全球油价持续下跌抵消食品成本上涨,也可能仅加息25个基点。菲律宾央行上月已加息50个基点至5.5%。大华银行预计,央行将在12月及2027年第一季度各加息25个基点,因通胀压力持续且比索疲软,暂缓加息的可能性较小。
🎉16🔥14❤9👍9😍8
SM投资前三季净利增9%至702亿比索 菲律宾SM投资公司(SMIC)今年前三季度净利润同比增长9%,达702亿比索,合并收入从4823亿比索增至5068亿比索。银行业务贡献最大,占利润的48%,其次是地产、零售和组合投资。BDO Unibank同期利润创历史新高,达636亿比索,贷款组合增长16%;China Banking Corp.利润升至226亿比索。SM Prime Holdings利润下降5%至354亿比索,仍占合并净利的26%。SM Retail净利润增长7%至131亿比索,商场业务收入增长10%至637亿比索。总裁兼CEO Frederic DyBuncio表示,消费需求持续支撑零售和商场业务,组合投资盈利增强。截至9月底,集团总资产为1.8万亿比索。
❤15❤🔥14🔥3👍1👏1
菲律宾助产士资格考试放榜 巴丹半岛州立大学毕业生夺魁 菲律宾专业监管委员会公布本月助产士执照考试成绩,全国18个考区共2632人应考,1343人通过。巴丹半岛州立大学毕业生安吉拉·玛丽·德拉托雷·林坎科以93.50%的成绩位列第一。考生50人以上的院校中,北内格罗斯州立大学通过率最高,52人中49人通过,达94.23%;考生20至49人的院校中,马基拉拉科技学院20人中19人通过,通过率95.00%。
💯11😍7🎉6🔥5🥰3
菲律宾能源部重启煤矿合同招标 菲律宾能源部已重启备受争议的煤矿招标,中标结果定于明年年初公布。能源部依据与环境和自然资源部的联合行政令发布招标通知,计划11月13日举行标前会议,12月11日截止提交标书并开标,12月18日公布合格投标人名单,12月21日开启财务方案,12月28日宣布最高投标人,2027年1月11日发出中标通知,1月13日签署煤矿运营合同。政府推动这一时间表,是因为Consunji家族领导的Semirara Mining and Power Corp.现有合同将于2027年7月到期。包括该公司在内的多个团体对要求现有运营商向政府移交资产的条款表示担忧,DMCI Holdings董事长兼总裁Isidro Consunji称该条款可能面临法律挑战。能源部长Sharon Garin表示,该机构准备在法庭上为该条款辩护,并称招标延迟是因为政府一直在研究其法律、商业及能源安全影响。
❤12💯7❤🔥5🤩3🎉1
Globe电信2027年启用首条新海底电缆 菲律宾环球电信公司(Globe Telecom)计划在2027年前启用三条新国际海底电缆系统中的第一条,以增强网络容量和冗余,应对电缆中断带来的影响。该公司在媒体简报会上表示,亚洲链路电缆(ALC)预计明年投入运营。ALC全长6000公里,项目耗资3亿美元,连接香港和新加坡与菲律宾、文莱达鲁萨兰国及中国海南,由环球电信与DITO电信、中国电信全球、新加坡电信及文莱统一国家网络公司共同建设。ALC启用将与该公司在拉乌尼翁省卢纳的第五个国际电缆登陆站启用同步。另外两条系统——Candle电缆系统预计2028年上线,Asia United Gateway East目标为2029年。这些投资还旨在支持云计算和人工智能日益增长的需求。
🤩8👍7🔥6🎉5😍4
vivo菲律宾推出头戴耳机与耳夹式耳机 vivo菲律宾近日推出两款音频穿戴产品——vivo Headphones Studio头戴式耳机与vivo Buds Clip耳夹式耳机,与vivo V80一同发布。两款产品均支持Hi-Res Wireless Audio认证、空间音频及三设备连接。Headphones Studio重238克,支持自适应主动降噪,关闭降噪续航75小时,开启为35小时,充电10分钟可播放9小时,售价8,999比索。Buds Clip单耳重5.2克,支持AI通话降噪及掉落提醒功能,续航42小时并支持无线充电,售价7,299比索。vivo菲律宾品牌营销总监Liu Lu表示,希望为用户提供更多日常聆听选择。同期还推出10,000mAh、33W快充移动电源,售价1,699比索。三款产品已在全国vivo实体店发售。
👍9💯6😍6🔥3👏2
马尼拉水务获准从灌溉水坝取水应对厄尔尼诺 菲律宾大都会自来水和污水处理系统署已允许Maynilad水务公司从灌溉水坝取水,以缓解厄尔尼诺现象的影响。该署署长莱昂诺尔·克莱奥法斯表示,安加特水坝水位正逐步回升,目前为209.36米,正逐小时监测,希望12月底达到214米。Maynilad总裁兼首席执行官拉蒙西托·费尔南德斯称,此举预计可使约17.6万名用户受益。该公司还通过减少漏损每天节省2.78亿升水,并利用废水回收技术和拉古纳湖供水。与此同时,马尼拉电力公司预计厄尔尼诺高温将推高用电需求,可能影响现货市场价格。
😍10🥰9🤩8
菲议员促能源部与油企全面落实燃油降价 菲律宾马尼拉——1-Rider党团众议员罗奇·古铁雷斯周三呼吁能源部及石油公司全面落实每升最高两位数的燃油降价,并称此举“罕见且意义重大”。此前有报道称部分加油站未完全执行降价。古铁雷斯表示,批准的降价于11月10日生效并持续至11月16日,汽油每升降16.80比索,柴油每升降4.10比索,煤油每升降3.70比索。他称这对骑手和日常驾车者来说是罕见而重大的缓解,任何未完全传导降价的行为都是对公众的失职,并敦促能源部等机构加强对全国零售加油站的监测,确保油企立即执行较低价格。
❤🔥15💯15🔥3
专家:养育健康儿童需家庭与社区共同支持 菲律宾马尼拉雅典耀大学医学院教授洛尔德斯·贝尔纳黛特·“蒂皮”·松帕伊科-坦昌科近日在线上讲座中指出,儿童健康受遗传、家庭、社会、文化和环境因素共同影响,仅靠营养食物、定期体检和充足运动并不足够。她表示,基因并不决定健康的一切,孕期和童年时期的营养、压力等经历可能影响日后健康风险。她强调,儿童从成人行为中学习,家长应以身作则,并建议从一两个可实现的改变入手,如固定就寝时间、逐步引入新食物。她同时指出,家庭无法独自承担这一责任,可负担的食品、可及的医疗、安全的社区以及支持性的学校和工作安排同样必要。
😍8❤🔥7🎉6💯5❤4
壳牌菲律宾第三季度利润增逾五倍 壳牌菲律宾公司(SPC)周三发布的季度财务报告显示,第三季度净利润从去年同期的3.43亿比索增至17.9亿比索,增幅超过五倍;但前三季度整体由盈转亏,净亏损9.292亿比索,去年同期为盈利13.1亿比索。第三季度净销售额同比增长49.2%至859.2亿比索,销售成本增长53.1%至792.5亿比索。前三季度净销售额增长35.6%至2329亿比索,销售成本增长41.8%至2197亿比索。公司上半年净亏损约27.2亿比索,部分被第三季度利润抵消。2026年资本支出预算最高30亿比索,2027年至2030年计划每年最高40亿比索。首席财务官阿比洛8月表示,公司正准备在宿务开设维萨亚斯地区首个进口码头,这将是其在菲律宾的第五个进口码头。周三本地股市,SPC股价下跌1.01%,收于每股7.85比索。
🎉14👍10❤1👏1🔥1
菲律宾警方追捕四小时抓获抢劫便利店团伙 菲律宾新怡诗夏省加潘市一家便利店周二晚9时遭持枪抢劫。监控显示,一辆白色面包车停在店前,嫌疑人起初假装购物,随后一人突然拔枪指向收银员并洗劫收银机,另将两名男顾客绑起带至仓库,并迫使收银员打开保险库。嫌疑人离开后,店员报警。警方追捕约四小时,于凌晨2时左右在拉古纳省阿拉米诺斯与八打雁省圣托马斯交界处截获嫌疑人,逮捕六人。警方从该团伙缴获四支枪、四枚手榴弹、车牌及从便利店抢走的3.5万比索。第三大区警署主任门德斯称,嫌疑人年龄在19至22岁之间,审讯中承认还涉及黎刹省多起抢劫案。第四A大区警署主任巴凯表示,协调良好使警方得以提前布控拦截白色面包车。被捕者中包括该团伙头目,其因劫车和抢劫已有两项逮捕令。警方称该团伙主要在卡拉巴松地区活动。
🎉10❤🔥4🔥4❤3💯3
MCCBL:CPC加时逆转TCC 两场高中赛大比分 11月10日,宿务市体育学院举行的MCCBL第二赛季比赛中,科尔多瓦公立学院(CPC)在第三节一度落后14分的情况下奋起直追,将比赛拖入加时,最终以91比83逆转上赛季决赛队伍塔利赛市学院(TCC)。CPC的Franco Gabunada砍下全场最高的25分,另有5次助攻和3个篮板。此役过后,CPC以5胜0负独占榜首,TCC则在六场比赛中遭遇第二场失利,退居第二。另一场大学组比赛中,印第安纳航空航天大学(IAU)以81比78险胜萨拉查科技学院(SC-SIT)。高中组方面,SC-SIT以95比38大胜宿务圣心学院,IAU以117比63击败科尔多瓦合作天主教学校。
🔥12❤11👍2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,991 posts we hold for @bx66664. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 17 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“菲律宾大事件-东南亚曝光吃瓜记” (@bx66664), 137,026 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bx66664.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.