Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 7 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 13 of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,972 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 95 days, net -2,247. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 126,850–160,622 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 07:35
137,026
-491
9 Nov 2026, 12:40
137,517
-1,078
8 Nov 2026, 03:20
138,595
-733
7 Nov 2026, 03:41
139,328
-1,468
6 Nov 2026, 05:01
140,796
-673
5 Nov 2026, 07:47
141,469
-260
4 Nov 2026, 09:28
141,729
-427
3 Nov 2026, 08:09
142,156
-461
2 Nov 2026, 06:57
142,617
-232
1 Nov 2026, 09:36
142,849
-147
31 Oct 2026, 11:47
142,996
-420
30 Oct 2026, 12:51
143,416
-945
29 Oct 2026, 14:11
144,361
-874
28 Oct 2026, 09:51
145,235
-713
27 Oct 2026, 11:11
145,948
-424
26 Oct 2026, 07:39
146,372
-265
25 Oct 2026, 08:49
146,637
-418
24 Oct 2026, 12:20
147,055
-854
23 Oct 2026, 15:25
147,909
-3,807
22 Oct 2026, 17:38
151,716
first reading
Engagement
2,007 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 194 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.81%
avg views ÷ 137,026 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,220
541 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
541
of 2,007 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 530 of 541 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
2,007 (7 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
2,826,010
Reactions total
19,629
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 03:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈23,300
Videos
≈1,690
Links
≈31
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9m 57s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 90 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37,933 reactions across 984 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
11,833
31.2%
👍
5,136
13.5%
🔥
4,978
13.1%
🎉
4,735
12.5%
🤩
2,467
6.50%
❤🔥
2,173
5.73%
😍
2,169
5.72%
🥰
2,120
5.59%
💯
2,024
5.34%
👏
280
0.738%
😁
18
0.047%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 985 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,933 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 September 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 541 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
SSS小额贷款上线RCBC手机应用
菲律宾社会保障系统(SSS)宣布,其LoanLite小额贷款已通过Rizal Commercial Banking Corp.(RCBC)的DiskarTech应用提供,以扩大会员的数字渠道。RCBC是继菲律宾联合银行之后第二家参与该计划的金融机构。SSS周四表示,符合条件的MySSS持卡人可借款1000至20000比索,还款期限为15至90天,年利率为8%。SSS总裁兼首席执行官Victor Alfonso A. Limlingan, Jr.称,该合作将使服务更易获取。SSS表示,扩大参与金融机构网络将使更多会员能够在线使用LoanLite。
Kalix获iCare HMO认证扩大医疗服务
位于奎松市Bridgetowne的Exxa Tower综合多专科医疗中心Kalix宣布获得菲律宾主要健康保险公司之一iCare HMO的认证。符合条件的iCare会员可在Kalix使用初级和专科诊疗、诊断与实验室服务、物理治疗、入职及高管体检、季节性流感疫苗接种等服务,具体以各自健康计划的覆盖范围和条件为准。11月10日,iCare新任品牌大使Bimby Aquino与家人到访Kalix,体验患者就诊流程。iCare总裁兼首席执行官Geronimo V. Francisco表示,此举为会员提供在一处快速便捷获得多种医疗服务的新选择。Kalix计划于2027年初扩展至马卡蒂Ayala North Exchange及奎松市UP Technohub地区。
😍11❤6❤🔥6🎉6
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,007 posts we hold for @bx66664. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
dnydh @cc199 · 99,445 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
全球大事件曝光❖东南亚吃瓜新闻 @dsj665 · 115,998 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
迪拜新闻大事件-马来西亚吉隆坡吃瓜 @dnyuuu88 · 122,103 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚黑暗事件 @aq7777 · 49,824 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
今日东南亚大事件曝光-悬赏 @jrdnyxs · 74,642 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
东南亚新闻头条|东南亚热点资讯 @jiandan8884 · 106,542 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 August 2026
东南亚华人新闻曝光 @bgdsj26 · 112,786 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚曝光-新闻快报-吃瓜-悬赏 @dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 64,998 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
东南亚大事件-曝光-黑料 @DNYzzz6 · 70,600 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
东南亚骗子曝光吧 @pianzi1 · 51,046 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
全球华人新闻吃瓜头条大曝光 @dnyqqbj · 93,025 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
柬埔寨新闻头条【体育资讯】 @TTDR8 · 75,912 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
西港日记 / 东南亚新闻 @xigang13 · 58,432 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
东南亚头条曝光 @QQ888880000 · 97,004 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
全球|大事件|新闻|曝光|吃瓜 @bgtjt · 104,513 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
Швидко та точно🇺🇦 @ukr_shvydko · 314,416 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
Давыдов.Индекс @davydovin · 1,905,917 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 17 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“菲律宾大事件-东南亚曝光吃瓜记” (@bx66664), 137,026 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bx66664.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.