9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -261. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,696–62,035 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 02:33
61,735
-18
12 Aug 2026, 03:02
61,753
-33
10 Aug 2026, 23:47
61,786
-33
9 Aug 2026, 20:56
61,819
-51
8 Aug 2026, 20:34
61,870
-55
7 Aug 2026, 22:32
61,925
-36
6 Aug 2026, 23:37
61,961
-35
6 Aug 2026, 01:36
61,996
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:00
61,996
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.58%
avg views ÷ 61,735 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,830
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
44 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
124,503
Reactions total
1,509
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,356 reactions across 39 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
382
28.2%
😁
299
22.1%
🔥
198
14.6%
❤
113
8.33%
🗿
90
6.64%
🐳
86
6.34%
🤯
58
4.28%
😢
30
2.21%
🫡
20
1.47%
😱
19
1.40%
🤣
19
1.40%
🕊
14
1.03%
🎉
8
0.59%
❤🔥
6
0.442%
💯
5
0.369%
🌚
2
0.147%
🌭
2
0.147%
🍾
2
0.147%
🤔
2
0.147%
👏
1
0.074%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,509reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 44 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crypton_off. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
👊 Трампу не удалось заработать!
Недавно на президента США подали в суд из-за того, что тот продаёт быстрый доступ к своим постам за $100 000 в месяц.
Истцы заявляют, что всё это является планом по вымогательству средств.
✅ Из интересного за день:
🫡 Блокчейн Harmony взломали и напечатали 4 млрд $ONE (~26% от общего количества монет).
😁 Неизвестный пользователь заплатил 1,6 $BTC (~$103 тысячи) комиссий за одну тра…
💎 Omniverse — главный ивент лета!
Наши знакомые проводят в Санкт-Петербурге Omniverse Web3 Camp: фестиваль диджитал-культуры 25-26 августа для 2000 человек.
Темой фестиваля станет новый интернет. Топовые спикеры в формате соло-спичей и панельных дискуссий обсудят насущное!
Помимо этого, будет куча других активностей:
▪️ Aster DEX (да, тот самый от CZ) впервые в России. Для 20 инфлюенсеров состоится трейдинг-турни…
На такой схеме владельцы MEV-ботов и зарабатывают миллионов долларов в год. Однако бизнес их не так прост, как может показаться.
▪️Во-первых, такие ситуации, как описанная выше, происходят не часто. В основном боты зарабатывают не с тех, кто "забыл" выставить проскальзывание, а с китов, которые его выставили, но размер их депозита всё равно вынуждает тратить деньги на обменах.
То есть, условный кит выставляет проск…
💸 Как боты зарабатывают сотни миллионов долларов?
Всем привет, на связи Crypton-образовательный! Сегодня мы разберём явление, которое пронизывает DeFi с момента его основания, но о котором редко говорят.
Для начала немного теории. Почти все обменники в DeFi работают по принципу весов — на одной чаше один актив (чаще всего стейблкоин), на другой чаше иной (чаще всего альткоин).
▪️Когда кто-то делает обмен, он измен…
💪 Покемоны уделали крипту
Карточки легендарных Pokemon с начала текущего года по темпам роста обогнали $BTC и фондовый рынок США.
▪️В 2026 биткоин упал на ~30%, S&P500 вырос на ~13%, а карточки прибавили к цене аж ~30%.
Уже даже активы допотопной игры растут лучше крипты... Или это всё лишь мимолётный хайп?
🗿 — покемоны легенда, кому нужна крипта
👍 — ажиотаж спадёт, а биток вечен
😁 — я покемон
Гайд по фьючерсам …
🏃 Майнеры бегут из биткоина в ИИ!
Бывший майнер $BTC продал все свои биткоины и перевёл вычислительные мощности на ИИ.
Также Anthropic заключил с майнинговой компанией сделку на ~$9 млрд с целью арендовать их железо.
✅ Из интересного за день:
🫡 Питер Шифф советует срочно продавать $BTC и $MSTR и покупать драгоценные металлы.
🚀 Anthropic готовится к IPO уже в этом сентябре или октябре.
🇺🇸 SEC готовит новые прави…
✨ Забираем гарантированные призы от CoinW!
Для пользователей из СНГ биржа CoinW запустила ивент с призовым пулом в $200 000.
▪️ Чтобы принять участие и получить 3 прокрута с гарантированными призами нужно сделать несколько простых действий:
▸ Регистрируемся 👉 по данной ссылке;
▸ Обязательно зайдите на страницу колеса и подтвердите участие;
▸ Пополняем баланс на 50+ USDT;
▸ Совершаем первую сделку на споте от 100 U…
👵 Бабушка заскамила мамонтов!
Обычно в новостях про мошенничество бабушки фигурируют в роли жертв, у которых похищают огромные суммы.
Однако 67 летняя женщина из Гонконга решила нарушить традицию — она втиралась в доверие к арендодателям, у которых снимала жильё, а затем предлагала им вложиться в криптовалюты.
Далее им дарили устройства с заранее предустановленными криптоприложениями, через которые уже похищались …
📉 Трамп сдампил биткоин!
Компания Trump Media с начала года планомерно продавала $BTC, суммарно "сбросив" более $170 млн в биткоине.
Однако уже в июле компания внезапно изменила стратегию, купив $BTC на ~$300 млн всего за один месяц, и тем самым обновила свой собственный ATH по количеству удерживаемых монет.
Сейлор продаёт вторую неделю подряд, но Трамп покупает — на инсайдах? 💭
Гайд по OpenClaw | Активности | Об…
😱 Крупнейший майнер отчитался о продаже 23 093 BTC (~$1,63 млрд)
Битки были проданы в первой половине 2026 года по средней цене в $70 631.
В конце июня на балансе компании находилось 35 577 BTC ($2,08 млрд).
✅ Из интересного за день:
😱 Трамп потребовал от Ирана компенсаций за конфликт вокруг пролива.
💻 C платформы для криптоплатежей Coinsbuy украли $8 млн.
🫡 Криптана и основателя инвест фонда нашли мёртвым посл…
🍒 Устал от очередей — запусти Claude
Один парень попросил ИИ-агента забронировать утреннюю тренировку в спортзале.
▪️ Claude обнаружил, что все слоты заняты и предложил с этим помочь.
▪️ Агент через API отменил все брони и записал своего хозяина на все утренние тренировки на месяц вперёд.
«API не проверяет авторизацию при отмене бронирований. Я проверил это на человеке, занимающем первую позицию в списке ожидания…
😱 Сейлор опять нашёл кнопку «Sell»
На прошлой неделе Strategy продали 1 690 BTC.
Обмен крипты | Гайд по фьючерсам | Активности
👍12🫡12🔥5❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @crypton_off. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Оплата иностранных сервисов и покупки за рубежом28%
Перевод денег в другие страны21%
Хранение средств вне банковской системы40%
Удобный способ додепа в казино21%
The shares total 201%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 10,103 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 44 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Coin Post – Деньги, инвестиции, биткоин @Coin_Post · 294,950 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTON | Биткоин, DeFi, WEB 3” (@crypton_off), 61,735 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypton_off.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.