Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

富婆日记

@fuporiji

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

38,201subscribers

+771 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001877308372
TypeChannel
Usernames@fuporiji @piyamei999
Description关注富婆日记 飞机跑的最快的女记者 投稿皮娅妹 @piyameibot 免费NFT担保 皮娅 @piya
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fuporiji

Growth

37,15838,32637,7427 August 2026 — 37,430 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,430 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,399 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,310 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,169 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,158 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,791 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,788 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,735 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,735 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,516 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,516 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,658 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,654 subscribers13 August 2026 — 38,326 subscribers14 August 2026 — 38,288 subscribers15 August 2026 — 38,201 subscribers38,2017 August 202615 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 8 days, net +771. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,983–38,501 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:5638,201-87
14 Aug 2026, 01:1738,288-38
13 Aug 2026, 17:1638,326+672
12 Aug 2026, 20:1337,654-4
12 Aug 2026, 16:2537,658+142
11 Aug 2026, 17:4337,516no change
11 Aug 2026, 17:2637,516-219
10 Aug 2026, 19:3137,735no change
10 Aug 2026, 19:1237,735-53
9 Aug 2026, 17:4237,788-3
9 Aug 2026, 15:1337,791+633
8 Aug 2026, 21:0437,158-11
8 Aug 2026, 14:4337,169-141
7 Aug 2026, 23:3037,310-89
7 Aug 2026, 16:1037,399-31
7 Aug 2026, 12:1537,430no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:0737,430first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.62%
avg views ÷ 38,201 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,150
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.086%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held27 (29 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total57,956
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
719
Videos
35
Links
80

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 6059992687635864246526.3%
custom 6201935653052092324526.3%
custom 6228893354587856148526.3%
custom 6228546656237787272421.1%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 27 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fuporiji. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,100 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

币安刚刚发布公告表示,为配合监管要求,包括 HTX、EXMO、ABCeX 等多家交易所,被列入不再处理相关交易名单。他们建议用户,避免通过币安直接或间接,向以上几家转入或接收资产。如继续尝试,账户可能会被审查或冻结。 4月份之前英国那个合规的公告,把HTX列入了不合规。孙哥应该是跟币安,okx谈了很久,才让USDT进入交易所。现在币安也不让充值了,okx估计一会公告 HTX用户的钱再次面临变成欢乐豆。隐隐感觉有一双无形的大手抓着孙哥不放,感觉孙哥今年要出事……。

custom 62019356530520923242

Signed 皮娅妹

14 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC876 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

有人说我过度解读 那就让ai解读具体条例吧 AI解读 全文 https://chatgpt.com/s/t_6a7f0ccd5ee481919e2bd5737122d4db 解读一下这个第六条,用通俗的话说 通俗来说,第六条的意思是: 公安机关为了维护网络安全,可以依法检查几乎所有参与网络和数据业务的单位或个人。 主要包括: 提供服务器、云服务、机房、域名、CDN、互联网接入的平台; 网吧、公共 Wi-Fi 等公共上网服务商; 网站、App、机器人、网络平台的运营者及技术维护人员; 提供软件、网络产品或技术服务的公司; 收集、存储、使用、传输数据的企业或个人; 处理姓名、手机号、身份证、IP、设备信息、聊天记录、交易记录等个人信息的主体。 其中你标出的第(六)项“数据处理者”,范围非常广。**只要业务中对数据进行了收集、保存、使用、加工、传输、提供或者删除,都可能算数据处理者。**不一定非得是大型互联网公司,小公司、工作室甚

Signed 皮娅妹

14 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈1,270 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

还在国内干灰产的注意了! 公安部上周公布了网络空间监督检查办法,对国内干灰产的可以说是非常危险了。 首先,无论你是什么角色,公安都有权强制检查你的手机。而且,市级以上公安局,就可以对你的系统进行“渗透测试”,也就是黑客攻击。 在这之前其实叔叔如果想看你手机的话,大多数人也只能乖乖配合。现在有法律依据了,随时都可以查你手机。 希望各位跑路狗在跑路的路上遇到叔叔,叔叔查手机伸张正义!

custom 60599926876358642461

Signed 皮娅妹

11 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,850 views3 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

卢本伟 五五开 和巴旦木结婚了? 我随55u 记黑奴 @nunu 头上。

custom 62288933545878561483

Signed 皮娅妹

10 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,960 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

这大聪明,给自己写励志帖子,说自己2019年开始查档,如何奋斗从0赚到了500万,然后他还贴个地址流水截图,MD看的我都快感动哭了——黑产好青年啊。 但是我干你娘的,你配图是我们担保地址截图是为什么? 小子打码还知道去头去尾。 原贴 https://t.me/shebaotou/11 建议你换成新币的上押地址。

Signed 皮娅妹

10 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC≈3,150 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

DarkSword 被盗U团队利用,得手了!无感盗U 我6月底就频道提示大家了。当时我混的黑客圈有大佬就提醒我不要用老旧iPhone放钱包,因为他们小圈子发现了DarkSword 零日漏洞,可以无感在iPhone用户浏览网站盗走私钥。 但是这个病毒只能在iOS18以下才行。 但是据说经过几个月的开发,黑客已经可以攻击到26的系统了。 据爆料8月7日,两部(一部运行iOS 18,另一部为iOS 26.4)存放不同钱包的iPhone前后只差10秒,约150万U(约1000万人民币)被全部转走,黑客还开小号来嘲笑被盗者。 现在是AI时代,通过AI的加成能发现更多系统漏洞,大家一定要管理好自己的USDT,如果你确实能力有限,欢迎大家寄存在我这儿,给你3%年化。

Signed 皮娅妹

9 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,810 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

以后谁也别找我借钱,杜洛夫都不好使。谁都别想骗我。

custom 62019356530520923241

Signed 皮娅妹

9 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈2,080 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

@shaoye 找这个人做过机器人的,或者有合作的赶紧止损。 这家伙3年nft老人,以购买地步和借钱周转为由杀熟,内部群已确认跑路了,跑了盛丰27000U 发哥4000U。 圈子里还有谁被骗了? #接龙 七天 2.7万 锦鲤 1.685万 盛丰 2.7万 发哥 0.4万 嘉宾 0.295万 揽胜 0.295万 神医 0.59万 365 0.82万 温蒂 0.59万

Signed 皮娅妹

9 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC≈1,760 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

一边是婚礼一边是葬礼 人们的悲喜并不相同。

Signed 皮娅妹

6 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈2,530 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

有没有要使用漫雾查地址安全的大佬,一起合租共享API吧,懂的人私信我。 @v222

Signed 皮娅妹

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @fuporiji. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“富婆日记” (@fuporiji), 38,201 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fuporiji.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.