Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SWOP TOKY | CRYPTO MEDIA

@swoptoky

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32,286subscribers

-118 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001381331570
TypeChannel
Username@swoptoky
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/swoptoky

Growth

32,28632,40432,3456 August 2026 — 32,404 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,404 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,399 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,383 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,371 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,363 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,343 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,323 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,309 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,286 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,268–32,422 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:1432,286-23
12 Aug 2026, 03:5232,309-14
11 Aug 2026, 06:3332,323-20
10 Aug 2026, 09:0132,343-20
9 Aug 2026, 08:4132,363-8
8 Aug 2026, 12:0732,371-12
7 Aug 2026, 12:5432,383-16
6 Aug 2026, 10:0032,399-5
6 Aug 2026, 01:5132,404no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:2432,404first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 22 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.52%
avg views ÷ 32,286 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,140
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.616%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held21 (22 April 20269 August 2026)
Views total3,411
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

152 reactions across 21 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7046.1%
🔥5133.6%
117.24%
👌95.92%
🌚74.61%
🐳31.97%
😢10.658%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC801 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🟡 BUFOS: Story-driven NFT-проект, за которым точно стоит последить На радаре достаточно early коллекция, которая уже набила в свои подписчики не плохое количество инфлов и успела залететь ко многим alpha-коллерам. BUFOS — новый NFT-проект от современного художника Joey Colombo, который готовится к запуску в сети Ethereum. В центре проекта — необычные иллюстрированные герои: обычные люди, коллекционеры, изобретатели

🔥5👍2

4 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,040 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🟡 Late Stage Archetypes: NFT флип на пару копеек ETH! На очереди ещё одна интересная коллаборация — Late Stage Archetypes, необычная fully animated NFT-коллекция от OG on-chain художника WizardX. Проект сочетает генеративное искусство с ручной курацией: несмотря на то, что коллекция создаётся алгоритмом, каждый NFT лично отбирается автором, благодаря чему коллекция ощущается намного более цельной, чем большинство к

🔥6

26 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,570 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🟡 Arcus: Новый Perp DEX от dYdX x Robinhood! Пока рынок болтается в неопределённости на радаре продолжают появляться интересные проекты, пусть уже и из почти вымершей меты PerpDEX. У проекта уже подтверждён собственный токен $ARCUS... Arcus — это новый Perp DEX на Robinhood Chain, который пытается соединить мир TradFi и Web3. Платформа позволит торговать токенизированными акциями и perpetual-контрактами 24/7 без т

👍5🔥3

13 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,510 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🟡 SwopToky x 0xWeb: Инструмент, который стал частью нашей работы в CT Каждый из нас постоянно залипает в CT, потому что большинство нарративов, проектов и возможностей появляются именно там. Но чем больше растёт канал и количество задач, тем сложнее становится физически успевать отслеживать всё вручную. Поэтому сегодня хотим рассказать о нашем новом партнёре — 0xWeb, браузерной веб-консоли для автоматизации и анали

🔥6👍3🐳1

9 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC≈1,430 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🟡 Momoyumemi: Новая коллаборация + шанс получить DTC Spot NFT продолжают набирать не плохие охваты в Twitter, а это значит что мы не перестаём хватать для вас WL споты. Momoyumemi — это NFT-коллекция, вдохновлённая персиковыми мечтами, мягкой эстетикой и личными историями. Каждый NFT представляет собой отдельный маленький мир с милыми персонажами, необычными ракурсами и эмоциональными деталями. 👀 Инфа по коллекции

👍7🔥3

3 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,560 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🟡 Gloombles: Fully On-Chain PFP с необычной механикой Ещё один интересный проект, который стоит добавить в вочлист — Gloombles от byVmeta. На художницу подписано много топовых проектов включая тот же Base. 👀 Инфа по коллекции: • Supply: 3824 NFT • Blockchain: TBA • Mint: Июль • Price: TBA • Platform: OpenSea Главная особенность проекта — полностью on-chain коллекция с более чем 19 000 возможных визуальных комбина

👍7🔥3

1 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,520 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🟡 UglyGuys: NFT-коллекция, где уродство — это главный вайб Сегодня у нас новенькая коллаба, на этот раз с достаточно ранним арт-проектом, который стартовал 16 июня и потихонечку захватывается Twitter. UglyGuys — это NFT-коллекция, которая полностью ломает привычные стандарты "красивого" PFP. Здесь чем уродливее — тем лучше. 👀 Инфа по коллекции: • Supply: 5302 NFT • Blockchain: Ethereum • Art Style: Weird / Meme P

👍4👌1

30 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,610 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🟡 CyberKongz: Они запускают новую коллекцию! 1 июля ребята из CyberKongz запускают коллекцию DUMPSTR, которые якобы будут пропуском в ончейн-механику арбитража SPL-токенов в Solana. Разберёмся, чем проект отличается от большинства NFT... 👀 Инфа по минту: — Chain: Solana — Supply: 2,222 NFT — Price: 0.69 SOL — Дата: 1 июля — Public mint: 21:00 МСК DUMPSTR — это автоматизированный on-chain движок, который использу

👍5🔥3

26 Jun 2026, 16:02 UTC≈2,040 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Скажи мне, зачем ты все ещё работаешь через P2P? Тебе не жалко свою карту? Проверять рейтинги, ловить честных продавцов и рисковать ради сомнительной экономии в пару копеек? Я отказался от этой мороки и выбрал тот вариант, который не несет в себе лишних нервов и страхов. Cifra Markets — официальная платформа с лицензией. Комиссия 1.5%, вывод от $3,5. Все просто: вносишь рубли по СБП → получаешь чистые USDT. И наобо

😢1

21 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC≈2,420 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🟡 Как найти работу в Web3 и почему большинство не получает оффер?! Сегодня снова разберём тему поиска работы в web3, так как с каждым днём она становится всё более актуальной. Проблема в том, что большинство ищет работу в web3 так же, как в web2. 👀 Где искать вакансии? • Crypto Careers • Web3 Career • Cryptocurrency Jobs • CryptoJobsList • BeInCrypto Jobs • Remote3 • Solana Jobs • AVAX Jobs • Ethereum Job Board

👍5🔥4

17 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,980 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🟡 Wintermute: Рынок выдохнул, но разворот ещё не подтверждён! Пришло время разобрать недавний отчёт по рынку знаменитой компании Wintermute. После нескольких недель паники рынок наконец получил повод для отскока. BTC прибавил +1,9%, альты +3,1%, фондовые индексы снова пошли вверх. Но, по мнению Wintermute, это пока скорее relief rally, чем начало нового бычьего цикла. 👀 Что помогло рынку? • Во-первых, инфляция в

👍2

11 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,940 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🟡 Свапаете USDT в Европе? Можно перестать терять на комиссиях Если вы живёте в ЕС и получаете выплаты в USDT, то наверняка уже заметили последствия MiCA. Всё больше сервисов и платёжек постепенно переходят на USDC, а обычный обмен USDT → USDC на крупных суммах может легко стоить десятки долларов комиссии. Для примера можете сами посчитать потери через калькулятор. На биржах комиссии обычно ниже, но там приходится

🌚7

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @swoptoky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,543 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SWOP TOKY | CRYPTO MEDIA” (@swoptoky), 32,286 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swoptoky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.